Australia: Valuation expert values the wrong thing; yet the court still finds value in the evidence


The case of Suncorp Metway Insurance Pty Ltd v Valuer-General (No.2) [2017] QLC 46 concerned an appeal against the Valuer-General's valuation of the site on which, in general terms, the Sofitel Hotel is located in the Brisbane CBD.

The Valuer-General's valuation was originally $39,500,000 but was subsequently reduced during the course of the appeal to $34,500,000.

The Appellant contended that the site had no value or a nominal value of $1 because of its unappealing location and the restrictions on construction. Alternatively, if a certain development was possible, the Appellant contended that a site valuation of $13,180,000 was appropriate.

The Court found that the Valuer-General's valuation expert had valued the wrong thing and the evidence was therefore based on significant errors of fact. However, the Court still found some utility in the evidence.

The Court ultimately found that the Appellant's valuation expert's evidence was the better evidence, despite the Court cautioning the expert for being argumentative. The Court allowed the appeal and reduced the valuation to $13,180,000.


The Court had to first determine what was to be valued.

The Appellant contended that the appeal concerned Lot 2, being a volumetric lot with a footprint having an area of 7,432 square metres. The lot sits within the volumetric lot which is over Central Station in the Brisbane CBD.

In the course of the appeal, the Valuer-General wrote to the Appellant and reduced the amount of the valuation but, in doing so, referred to the property in question as being land the subject of certain leases, being leases to the Appellant from Queensland Rail. Further, the Valuer-General later sought to amend its statement of facts, matters and contentions so that the land being valued included the leases to Queensland Rail.

The Court was not satisfied that such an amendment was possible and held that the thing being valued was Lot 2, being the volumetric lot having a footprint of 7,432 square metres and not including the leases to Queensland Rail. As such, the Valuer-General's valuation expert had valued the wrong thing.

Although the Court found that the Valuer-General's valuation expert had valued the wrong thing, the Court still found some utility in the evidence. The Court stated that the evidence was still useful in considering whether the Appellant's valuation expert had applied the correct rate for determining the value of the site.


The Valuer-General submitted that the Appellant's valuation expert did not meet the standards expected of an impartial and independent expert as the expert was argumentative and offensive.

Although the Court agreed with the Valuer-General's criticism of the Appellant's valuation expert's behaviour, the Court found that it would be unfair to penalise the Appellant for the lack of professionalism shown by its valuation expert. The Court stated that it would be a last resort, suitable for the most extreme cases, to disregard the evidence of the Appellant's valuation expert.

Consequently, the Court found that the Appellant's valuation expert's evidence was still useful and should be considered on its merits.


The Court acknowledged that there "is simply something different to the land the subject of the appeal" (see paragraph 52).

The differentiating characteristics of the land included its location above Central Station in the Brisbane CBD and the associated construction restrictions, as well as the restrictions because of its geographical location.

The Court found that building over a major operational railway would be inherently difficult. The difficulties identified by the Court included the requirement to negotiate with Queensland Rail about the type of development and the construction elements and process, as well as the requirement to manage disruptions to a major operational railway.


Despite the Valuer-General's valuation expert valuing the wrong thing and the Appellant's valuation expert being criticised, the Court did not automatically dismiss the evidence of either expert and considered each comparable sale in turn.

The comparable sales were as follows:

  • 111 Mary Street - The valuation experts relied upon different sales of 111 Mary Street.
  • Relying upon the 2010 sale for $38,000,000, the Appellant's valuation expert adopted the rate of $5,253 per square metre. This rate allowed for the excavation of the site to a value of $10,000,000. However the actual cost of the excavation was $24,500,000. This adjustment was criticised by the Court because of the amount of the adjustment and the tenuous basis for the valuation. The Court did not accept that the sale was a reliable guide.
    Relying upon the 2014 sale of the volumetric lot for $29,000,000, the Valuer-General's valuation expert adopted the rate of $637 per square metre of GFA. However, the Valuer-General's valuation expert contended a higher rate was more appropriate because of the improvements in excavation works that had occurred since the sale and the superior location of the site. As such, the Valuer-General's valuation expert valued the site at $1,000 per square metre. The Court rejected the Valuer-General's valuation expert's evidence on the basis that it lacked reliability and was unconvincing.
    Consequently, the Court rejected the analysis of both valuation experts for 111 Mary Street.
  • 304 George Street - The Appellant's valuation expert adopted the same rate used by the Land Court in Brisbane Square Pty Ltd v Valuer-General [2016] QLC 69 being $7,793 per square metre. The Valuer-General's valuation expert agreed with the basis upon which the rate was determined but disagreed with the Appellant's valuation expert's inclusion of the excavation costs in the valuation.
  • The Court found that it was appropriate for the Appellant's valuation expert to take into account the excavation costs because they were used in the redevelopment. The Court accepted the Appellant's valuation expert's analysis of the rate per square metre but observed that the sale at 304 George Street was superior to that of the site and its potential should be considered in the valuation of the site.
  • 65 Mary Street - Only the Valuer-General's valuation expert relied on this sale. It sold in February 2014 for $7,300,000 which amounted to $756 per square metre of GFA. The Valuer-General's valuation expert adopted the same rate per square metre for the site.
  • The Court found that the Valuer-General's valuation expert's evidence was unconvincing as the site was located in an inferior location when compared to 65 Mary Street. As a result, the Court rejected the Valuer-General's valuation expert's evidence relating to this sale.
  • 127 Charlotte Street - This property sold in May 2010 for $9,090,908 which amounted to a rate of $986 per square metre of GFA. Only the Valuer-General's valuation expert relied on this sale.
  • He contended that the site commanded a higher value per square metre because the site is in a superior location. The Court found that, if anything, the property at 127 Charlotte Street is in a superior location. As a result, the Court rejected the Valuer-General's valuation expert's evidence relating to this sale.
  • 30 Albert Street - This property sold in December 2013 for $18,750,000. The Valuer-General's valuation expert determined the rate to be $9,936 per square metre. The Valuer-General's valuation expert again contended that the site was in a superior location when compared to this property. The Court found that the Valuer-General's valuation expert's evidence was unconvincing and rejected the evidence relating to this property.
  • 105/111 Margaret Street - This property sold in July 2011. The sale of 111 Margaret Street, Brisbane was in 2012 and was purchased by the adjoining owner. The Valuer-General's valuation expert relied on both sales as the one transaction. The Court found that the sale "is a confection of two sales" which cannot be treated safely as one. As a result the Court rejected the Valuer-General's valuation expert's evidence regarding this property.
  • 168 Wharf Street - The Valuer-General's valuation expert relied upon this sale and determined the rate to be $977 per square metre. The Valuer-General's valuation expert considered this sale to be primary evidence of the appropriate value of the site because it supports the development of a four star hotel and is located 200 metres from the site. The Court agreed.

The Court preferred the Appellant's evidence and determined that the evidence submitted by its valuation expert was the better evidence. Consequently, the Court allowed the appeal and reduced the site valuation to $13,180,000.

Ian Wright Nadia Czachor
Planning government infrastructure and environment
Colin Biggers & Paisley

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Ian Wright
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.