Australia: Griffin Coal – The end of the Never Never, is it the death knell for traditional union approaches to bargaining?

Last Updated: 2 May 2017
Article by Mike Baldwin

If we are to take WA AMWU President Steve McCartney's view of the FWC decision in Griffin Coal seriously, then the FWC in terminating the enterprise agreement, has not only lost the plot, but has also abrogated its responsibility to maintain the 'status quo' in bargaining between employers and unions. McCartney, a renowned hardhead, described the FWC decision, which has seen coal mine workers take home pay reduced by 43%, as "an outrageous attack on...workers and their families".

Taken at face value, a year long process that will result in Griffin Coal miners about to be paid under the Black Coal Award, (Award) rather than The Griffin Coal (Maintenance) Collective Agreement 2012, McCartney's comments may be right. How after all could a workforce, which has not worked under the Award since the Keating era, now find that their next pay check comes courtesy of the Award rather than the time honoured enterprise bargaining agreement process?

Oh if it were so, in fact, far from being a 'rogue decision', a closer examination of the issues in play would indicate that the Commission was left with little option when applying the 'public interest test'. Some will question how a 43% reduction in take home pay is in the public interest and is there precedent for such a move? To the chagrin of the AMWU and the union movement the short answer is yes, all of which leads us to ask where to next?

So just how did we get to this point?

The value of precedent: Aurizon

In April 2015, in a Full Bench decision Aurizon Operations Limited: Aurizon Network Pty Ltd; Australian Eastern Railroad Pty Ltd [2015] FWCFB 540, rejected the status quo belief that it was inappropriate to terminate an enterprise agreement during bargaining. In September 2015, this Full Bench decision was confirmed by the Full Court of the Federal Court who dismissed an application by various unions, seeking to overthrow the decision.

In Aurizon, the Full Bench held that the correct interpretation of section 226 of the Act (the 'public interest test') is that it should be construed in a manner that is consistent with the language and purpose of the provision by reference to the language of the Act as a whole. In rejecting the previous status quo precedent reasoning of Tahnmoor Coal [2010] FWA 6468, the Full Bench debunked the notion that the statute somehow placed a higher value on good faith bargaining as a means of achieving productivity than any other means. Accordingly one should not terminate an existing agreement, as to do so would shift the balance of bargaining power to the advantage of one party (ie the employer, who is seeking to terminate the agreement).

The Full bench in outlining the correct interpretation of section 226 put forward the following propositions:

  • there is nothing inherently inconsistent between the termination of an enterprise agreement that has passed its nominal expiry date and the continuation of collective bargaining in good faith. Indeed termination of an existing agreement that is no longer delivering productivity benefits, might better support the goal of greater productivity outcomes through bargaining for a new agreement;
  • while the termination of agreements clearly disturbs the bargaining process, this step is not in and of itself contrary to the objects of the Act;
  • unions and employees still have available to them "the full arsenal of tools under the Act to assert legitimate industrial pressure;"
  • the Act sets out safety net terms and conditions which provide the benchmark for whether an agreement passes the statutory "Better Off Overall Test"

In trying to determine just how important this decision is, it is clear that both the FWC and the federal court unambiguously outlined the principles which are to apply when the Commission is considering an application to terminate an Agreement.

Griffin Coal – Background

Griffin Coal's operations in south west WA (Collie) have been under inordinate financial pressure for many years. By some estimate the operation has not made a profit for almost a decade and the long-term depressed price for coal has only made matters considerable worse, with the company losing money on every single ton of coal produced. Given the small tonnage of thermal coal produced each year (2.26 million tonnes), and labour costs exceeding 43%, deep structural change was necessary if the operation was to be in any way viable.

It was with this background front and centre, that Griffin and the AMWU were engaged in long term bargaining in an attempt to renew the existing Griffin Coal (Maintenance) Collective Agreement 2012 (Agreement). The parties had been in active discussions for over 12 months with twenty four meetings being held between March 2015 and February 2016. So whilst there is little doubt that both parties wanted to find agreement, neither were prepared to move away from their starting points.

Unsurprisingly after a long period of fruitless negotiation, the AMWU made an application for a Protected Action Bargaining Order (PABO) on 26 November 2015. The order was granted on 7 December 2015, with AMWU members voting to approve protected action on 11 January 2016. Thereafter Griffin were notified that from 19 January, the industrial action was to commence and continue indefinitely.

As can be expected in these matters, following an application to the Commission from Griffin to stop the industrial action, numerous conferences facilitated by the Commission were held between the parties, in an attempt to reach an agreement on a replacement agreement.

Despite all of this effort the negotiations came to nought.

The difficulty here was Griffin as a loss making enterprise, needed to make fundamental structural changes to its operation in order to return the mine to viability, including;

  • Reducing employee entitlements;
  • Changing the roster;
  • Reduction in superannuation, redundancy and other entrenched entitlements
  • Use of contractors.

The union for its part clearly took a different view. The union model of enterprise bargaining is never about agreeing to reduced supposedly 'hard won entitlements'.

The 'Public Interest test' again in the firing line

As in Aurizon, the decision to terminate the Agreement is intimately linked with Commissioner Cloghan's interpretation of the public interest, as outlined in section 226 of the Act.

The Act requires that FWA must terminate the agreement if:

  • it is contrary to the public interest;
  • it is appropriate, taking into account all the circumstances including the views of the employer, employees, and the AMWU and;
  • the likely effects on the employer, employees and the AMWU should the agreement be terminated.

In reviewing the testimony of several employees, the Commission noted:

  • the current employee superannuation entitlement of 13.5% and the company's need to reduce it to 9.5%.
  • the view that a decision to terminate the Agreement would give Griffin "an enormous and unfair advantage in negotiating a new agreement".
  • the uniform view of employees that a return to the Award would be far less favourable.

The union, in opposing termination of the Agreement pointed to:

  • the substantial reduction in pay and conditions of its members if forced back to the Award;
  • there being no guarantees by Griffin that it would mitigate the impact of employees returning to the Award; and
  • in these circumstances the possible replacement of permanent employees by contractors.

For its part Griffin's strategy to press ahead with the application to terminate was motivated exclusively by the need to create efficiencies, improve productivity, reduce operational costs and to remove restraints created by legacy entitlements domicile in the Agreement and its predecessors.

The decision to terminate the Agreement

In applying the 'Public Interest test' and terminating the Agreement, Commissioner Cloghan somewhat tellingly, notes that despite a year's hard bargaining, no agreement was forthcoming nor was it likely in the short term. He goes further in stating that 'no unprofitable, inefficient, inflexible business remains in existence as some sort of societal right'.

Whilst acknowledging that this decision will result in reduced conditions of employment, he makes the strong point that this outcome is foreseen in the scheme of the Act and the public interest ought not only be viewed within the narrow prism of the parties only.


This decision is currently under appeal and the act of reverting back to the Award stayed. So, if confirmed on appeal, its impact could have ramifications for industrial parties as they negotiate new agreements. Employers currently operating loss making operations, will draw succour and courage in its dealings with difficult unions. Unions, need to tread carefully as the age-old approach to negotiation of agreements has under certain circumstances been shown not to work. That said, each case will be judged on its own merits and I suggest only those applications that resemble the Griffin matrix will be successful.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Kott Gunning is a proud member of

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions