Galdona v Peacock  NSWCATAP 64
The NCAT Appeal Panel recently considered an appeal by a builder that the Tribunal below had erred in failing to consider section 48MA of the Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) (the Act), that rectification of defective works by the responsible party is to be the preferred outcome.
This case arose out a contract for concreting works. In finding for the owner, the Tribunal ordered that the builder pay $17,257.90 to the owner, representing the cost of full replacement of the defective works.
The builder appealed this order as the cost of rectification was significantly below the cost of replacement. The owner argued that the Tribunal had made an error of law when it failed to consider and apply section 48MA of the Act, which stated:
A court or tribunal determining a building claim involving an allegation of defective residential building work or specialist work by a party to the proceedings (the responsible party) is to have regard to the principle that rectification of the defective work by the responsible party is the preferred outcome.
The Appeal Panel found that the words "is to have regard to" make section 48MA a mandatory consideration for the Tribunal. The oral reasons of the Tribunal below disclosed that rectification of the defective work by the responsible party was considered not to be appropriate, however, the requirements of section 48MA were not referred to. The Appeal Panel found that this failure amounted to an error of law.
However, despite this finding, the Appeal Panel confirmed the Tribunal below's decision. The Appeal Panel found that even if section 48MA had been applied by the Tribunal below, its decision would have been no different.
We reach this conclusion having regard to the fact that the Tribunal Member made the following findings. First, the relationship between the parties had broken down. Secondly, the appellants did not acknowledge the poor standard of the work they had carried out. Thirdly, the Tribunal Member had severe reservations as to the appellant's ability to rectify the work with due care and skill. These findings were in our view sufficient to justify a decision that the preferred outcome of rectification by the appellants should not be ordered.
In doing so, the Appeal Panel observed that section 48MA only required the Tribunal to have regard to the principle of rectification by the responsible party being the preferred outcome, it did not make the preferred outcome the mandatory outcome.
In the media
Housing price update 'shouldn't surprise anybody'
ABS data confirming the accelerated growth of the residential property market in late 2016 shouldn't come as a surprise, according to the Housing Industry Association (23 March 2017). More...
Empowering consumers through smart solar monitoring
The Turnbull Government will provide $2.1 million in grant funding to Solar Analytics to fast track smart solar monitoring for residential homes. The aim is to install the smart solar monitoring technology in 25,000 homes by 2020. The technology increases the energy yield of a rooftop solar system by as much as 15 per cent, providing direct benefit to householders (22 March 2017) More...
Energy efficiency boost for 500 homes means St Vincent de Paul Society tenants benefit from CEFC input
The CEFC has congratulated the St Vincent de Paul Society NSW and Amélie Housing on its new program to design, construct, operate and maintain 500 energy efficient homes under the NSW Government Social and Affordable Housing Fund (SAHF) (15 March 2017). More...
NSW Government Ignores Good Advice on Building Reform
Amendments to the NSW Home Building Act that impact upon the way its Home Building Compensation Fund (HBCF) scheme operates were supposedly informed from submissions made by the various interested parties and industry stakeholders (23 March 2017). More...
Living well - apartments, comfort and resilience in climate change
Thrive Research Hub: 21 March 2017
This project examines how Melbourne apartment samples perform in heatwaves in the context of international standards. It also looks at retrofit options to future proof apartments and make them more liveable. More...
ACI Construction Briefs
A fortnightly communication highlighting key updates related to Australia's construction industry.
Practice and courts
ABCB Reminder: GDO Calculator
20 March 2017 -Testing period for the new Gutters, Downpipes and Overflow calculator is closing 24 March 2017. Reminder: GDO Calculator
ABCB: Consultation RIS released
The Consultation RIS Considers the application of the requirements for temperature control when replacing water heaters in private residences Responses to the questions contained within the RIS are invited until Friday 21 April 2017. Read the ,a href="http://www.abcb.gov.au/Resources/Publications/Consultation/Application-of-Temperature-Control-Requirements-for-Heated-Water">Consultation RIS. (09 March 2017)
Senate Inquiry Update Non-conforming building products
Status: Accepting Submissions; Date Referred: 11 October 2016; Submissions Close: 01 December 2016; Reporting Date: 25 May 2017
NSW BPB: Certifiers, be firm with builders to avoid missed inspections
It's important for certifiers to make sure builders and property owners understand their obligations regarding critical stage inspections. Mandatory inspections, as set out in the Environmental Planning and Assessment (EP&A) Act 1979 and regulations, are important to help ensure an occupation certificate (OC) can be issued ( 09 March 2017). More...
NSW BPB: Home building contracts can't be used for swimming pool certification
A contract for swimming pool certification work must include all the information required by the Building Professionals Regulation (clause 19A) (01 March 2017). More...
Galdona v Peacock  NSWCATAP 64
Adequacy of reasons, work orders under the Home Building Act, rectification as the preferred outcome under s.48MA of the Home Building Act 1989, failure to take into account relevant considerations. More...
Administrative Arrangements (Administration of Acts—Amendment No 1) Order 2017
This publication does not deal with every important topic or change in law and is not intended to be relied upon as a substitute for legal or other advice that may be relevant to the reader's specific circumstances. If you have found this publication of interest and would like to know more or wish to obtain legal advice relevant to your circumstances please contact one of the named individuals listed.