A Brisbane court has recently heard of a string of fake
marriages orchestrated by Migration agent Chetan Mashru and his
marriage-celebrant wife, Divya Gowda, between March 2011 and March
In order to obtain permanent residency in Australia through
spousal visas, 15 Indian men were "married off' to
Australian women under the scam. However, Section 240 of the
Migration Act makes it an offence to arrange a marriage for the
purposes of obtaining an Australian visa.
Leilani May was one of the 16 Australian brides and testified
about her fake marriage to Indian citizen, Amritpal Singh, in 2011.
The court heard that the couple forged documents and a statutory
declaration to prove their marriage with the help of Chetan and
Divya. Leilani was paid $1000 in cash up front and $250 into her
bank account every week afterwards by her husband for her part in
Leilani admitted to the court that the statutory declaration
provided to verify her relationship was false, and that the only
truth it contained was the fact that she loves curry, which in
itself was not sufficient to prove her relationship to Mr Singh.
Under Section 245 of the Migration Act, it's an offence to
create false statements in proving a genuine relationship.
Josephine Haig and Pradeep Singh were another couple involved in
the scam, with Josephine to receive a total of payment $30,000 over
two years. She was also asked by Chetan and Divya to change her
address to match Pradeep's.
Another Australian woman in the scheme, Alina Buza, was told to
set up joint bank accounts and credit cards, to go out for dinner
with her 'husband' and take photos, and to text her faux
partner to create evidence of a genuine relationship.
Prosecution Barrister, Greg Lynham, compared the marriages to
Channel Nine's television show 'Married at First Sight'
with the couples only meeting on the day of the wedding. There was
also no exchanging of vows and no wedding dress - the couples
merely exchanged and signed documents at Chetan and Divya's
Certain criteria must be met before a union between two people
can be characterised as a "marriage" (defined in the
Marriage Act as the 'union of a man and a woman to the
exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for
There are also certain ceremonial requirements of a marriage, as
outlined in the Marriage Act, including that:
The parties are over 18 years old;
The marriage is solemnised in the presence of an authorised
The necessary notice and documents are provided; and,
A witness present when the marriage takes place.
As in the present case, intentionally misleading government
officials and providing false documentation in order to migrate to
Australia and/or obtain a visa is fraudulent activity, known as
migration fraud. Under the Marriage Act, a marriage is void if
consent is obtained through fraud or duress. Whilst the case
involving Chetan and Divya showed that both parties were aware of
the intentions in the marriage, In The Marriage of Hosking
(1995) FLC 92-579 stands for the authority that
"fraud" as detailed in the Marriage Act was limited, and
concerns the nature of the ceremony.
In the case involving Chetan and Divya, given the nature of the
ceremonies - the mere signing and exchanging of the documents
between the two parties – the lack of fanfare would lead many
to question how genuine the relationships were, despite documents
being a necessary formality in validating a marriage.
Other cases in the courts
In The Marriage of Hosking, the wife married, fully
aware that it would extend her residency in Australia, and led her
husband to believe that after the marriage ceremony, they would
live together. The court determined that the husband was induced
into the marriage by fraud on the part of the wife.
Similarly, In The Marriage of Deniz  FLC 90 –
252, a marriage was deemed void on the basis that consent was
fraudulently obtained. The husband, a Turkish national,
intentionally misled his Australian partner into marrying him so he
could obtain permanent residency in Australia.
The latest on Chetan and Divya
Chetan faces 50 criminal charges, including 16 counts of giving
false documentation to authorities and 18 counts of influencing a
Commonwealth Official. Together, Chetan and Divya also face 16
counts each for arranging a marriage for a visa and to obtain
permanent residency in contravention of the Migration Act.
What are the key points that you need to know?
It is an offence to arrange a marriage between two people for
the purposes of obtaining an Australian visa;
It is an offence to create false statements to prove a genuine
A marriage is void if consent is obtained through consent or
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Many US citizens living in Australia and elsewhere around the world have found themselves faced with the difficult decision of whether to keep or renounce their US citizenship.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).