Australia: NSW Government Bulletin - 8 February 2017

Last Updated: 18 February 2017
Article by Christine Jones and Kim Nguyen
Most Read Contributor in Australia, September 2018

AGL pleads guilty to failure to disclose political donations

AGL Energy Limited and its subsidiary AGL Upstream Infrastructure (together AGL) pleaded guilty in the Land and Environment Court (Court) to eleven failures to make complete disclosures of political donations in breach of the statutory requirements. The matter was heard before Justice Moore.

Requirement to disclose
There has been a requirement to disclose relevant political donations in the context of various planning applications since 1 October 2008. The requirements to disclose were introduced to minimise any perception of undue influence in respect of an undetermined planning application.
The prosecution of AGL is the second successful set of prosecutions and follows on from the prosecution of Aston Coal 2 Pty Ltd for similar offences in 2013.

Background to the offences
The offences occurred between January 2008 and April 2014 in the context of various planning applications (project applications and subsequent modifications) made to the Minister for Planning in relation to the Camden Gas Project, the Newcastle Gas Storage Facility Project, the Broken Hill Solar Power Plant, the Dalton Power Project and the Gloucester Gas Project.
The offences stemmed from the failure to disclose donations worth $73,800 to variously the Australian Labour Party, the Liberal Party and the National Party.

In total AGL was fined $124,000. The Court also ordered that AGL pay the Secretary's costs of bringing the proceedings and that half of the fine was to be paid to the Secretary to cover some of the costs associated with the investigation and other expenses.

Approach to sentencing
The maximum penalty for each offence was $22,000 or imprisonment for 12 months or both. His Honour found that the offences could be broken down into two categories: the more serious offences involving multiple failures to disclose warranted a starting penalty at the upper end of the range of $18,000 and the less serious offences involving a single failure to declare warranted a starting penalty of $12,000, somewhere in the middle of the range. AGL had entered into a guilty plea at the earliest opportunity and for that it was given the maximum discount (25%). The result was to reduce the fines for the higher range offences to $12,000 and each of the middle range offences to $8,000.

No power to impose publication orders
Changes were made to the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act) on 15 July 2015 which expanded the range of orders that were able to be made as a consequence of a conviction for breaching that Act, including the making of orders to take specified action to publicise the offence.
The Prosecutor had sought a publication order with respect to each of the offences.
His Honour said that while he would have ordered the publication notices he did not have the power to do so because, given that the offences were committed before 15 July 2015, the provisions in section 19(1) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 which dealt with the effect of alterations in penalties, would prevent such an order from being imposed.

Payment of half of the fine to the Prosecutor
As part of the orders the Prosecutor sought up to 50% of each of the fines imposed for the offences. His Honour pointed out that while since 15 July 2015 the Court has had the power to order that the offender pay the regulatory authority the costs and expenses incurred during the investigation of an offence and in this case the Prosecutor did not seek such an order, it would be appropriate to make an order requiring 50% of each of the fines to be paid to the Prosecutor.
His Honour did not deal with the situation where a prosecutor sought both the payment of up to 50% of the fine and the costs and expenses incurred during an investigation, saying that was a matter for another day and other proceedings.

Save the Date - 24 March 2017

Government Lawyers half day conference

Holding Redlich invite you to attend an intensive half day conference. Registration is open to those employed in the public sector.

NSW Government Lawyers Linkedin Group

To start a conversation about Government Bulletin or issues of interest to NSW government lawyers, join the LinkedIn group NSW Government Lawyers by clicking on this link. Membership is open to those employed in the public sector.

In the media

High Court Rules Culleton Disqualified from Federal Election [2017] HCA 4
The High Court has today (3 February 2017) unanimously held that Rodney Norman Culleton was incapable of being chosen as a Senator under s44(ii) of the Constitution at the time of the 2016 election. The High Court found that Mr Culleton was convicted of a crime and was subject to be sentenced to imprisonment for one year or longer and that this disqualified him from being elected during the Federal election (03 February 2017). More...

Senate recount after High Court rules Culleton's election invalid
The High Court orders a special recount of the WA Senate vote after declaring the election of former One Nation senator Rod Culleton invalid (03 February 2017). More...

Culleton asks High Court for stay on removal from Senate
Former One Nation Senator Rod Culleton asks the High Court for a stay on his ejection from the Senate pending the outcome of two court cases (31 January 2017). More...

Susan Kiefel sworn in as first female High Court Chief Justice
She was appointed as Chief Justice in November and was today received by a full High Court bench (30 January 2017). More...

Re Day [2017] HCA 2: Senate Eligibility and Court of Disputed Returns
Last Friday (27 January 2017), the High Court of Australia delivered judgment from a single justice in the case of Re Day [2017] HCA 2. The hearing was to determine questions forwarded by the Court of Disputed Returns (30 January 2017). More...

Live entertainment venues gain lock out and last drink extensions
As part of the NSW Government's commitment to creating a more vibrant nightlife for Sydney while keeping the community safe, three live entertainment venues have been granted exemptions to the Sydney CBD and Kings Cross 'lockout' and 'last drinks' laws (27 January 2017). More...

High Court takes rare step to hear witnesses in Bob Day case
It's a high stakes game for former Labor senator Anne McEwen, who is waiting not just to hear whether former Family First senator Bob Day was validly elected,, but also what orders the court will make about how the vacancy should be filled (23 January 2017). More...

Amendments needed to same-sex marriage Exposure Draft to ensure it is free from discrimination
The legal profession has recommended a series of changes to the Exposure Draft of the Marriage Amendment (Same-Sex Marriage) Bill during a Parliamentary inquiry hearing in Melbourne today (23 January 2017). More...

Major Shake Up of Victoria's Bail System
Under the changes, the Government will ensure magistrates are available after hours to consider bail applications for people charged with violent offences where police oppose bail. This will mean more matters are heard by magistrates, rather than bail justices (23 January 2017). More...

Deadly Bourke St rampage prompts bail law reform in Victoria
The Victorian Government will establish a night court for magistrates to hear after-hours bail requests, as part of a big shake-up of the system following Melbourne's Bourke Street tragedy (23 January 2017). More...

Brisbane courts: Juror's internet search may force retrial
Taxpayers may be forced to stump up for the cost of a new trial for a Queensland police officer, after a judge told a court that a juror playing detective during a criminal trial may have flouted his orders (21 January 2017). More...

An Australian court has ruled your metadata is not personal information
The Australian Privacy Commissioner's quest to have telecommunications metadata classified as personal has come to an abrupt halt, with the full bench of the Federal Court ruling against the organisation (20 January 2017). More...

NSW Venues gain lockout and last drinks extensions
The NSW Government has announced the first live entertainment venues to gain extensions to the Sydney CBD and Kings Cross lockout and last drinks laws (20 January 2017). More...

Two charged over alleged fraud and identity crime offences: Australian Federal Police
A man and woman have been charged as part of an ongoing joint-agency investigation into alleged identity crime offences. Investigators seized various forms of identification and documentation (20 January 2017). More...

NSW Government Releases Consultation Paper on Civil Justice System Reform
The NSW Government is reviewing the civil justice system, releasing a consultation paper late last year that asks for public submissions on how it can improve the current system. In a media release announcing the launch of the paper, the Government cited figures from the Law and Justice Foundation saying that around 2.8 million people in NSW face a significant legal problem each year, with 85% of those matters involving civil law (19 January 2017). More...

Personal data up for grabs in NSW land titles sale, experts warn
The private operator of NSW's land titles registry would not only have access to all property and ownership data, but also sensitive information about bankruptcies, marriages, divorces and deaths, experts warn (12 January 2017). More...

In practice and courts

Productivity Commission: Report on Government Services
The annual Report on Government Services (RoGS) provides information on the equity, effectiveness and efficiency of government services in Australia. The 2017 RoGS will be progressively released from 24 January to 3 February. More...

OAIC: 28 January is Data Protection Day — are your digital accounts data-tight?
28 January 2017 is the 11th annual Data Protection Day — to mark the occasion, check the security of your digital accounts, and encourage others to do the same. More...

Applied Research in Crime and Justice Conference 2017
On 15 & 16 February 2017 the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research and the Griffith Criminology Institute will host the annual Applied Research in Crime and Justice Conference in Sydney. The conference will showcase empirical, policy relevant research across all crime and justice domains. More...

COAT National Conference, 8 - 9 June 2017
COAT National conference will be held in conjunction with the COAT NSW Conference in Sydney on 8 & 9 June 2017. SAVE THE DATE! 8 - 9 June 2017 CONFERENCE

OAIC: Privacy Commissioner v Telstra Corporation Limited Federal Court decision The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner notes the judgment made by the Federal Court today to dismiss our appeal of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal's decision in Telstra Corporation Limited and Privacy Commissioner [2015] AATA 991 (18 December 2015). The OAIC is currently considering the decision (19 January 2017). More...

Attorney-General's Department (AGD) Consultation - Telecommunications Data in Civil Proceedings
Released for public comment Consultation Paper - Access to Retained Data in Civil Proceedings (undated), the . AGD is interested in the following issues: the circumstances in which parties to civil proceedings request access to telecommunications data; the impact on civil proceedings if parties are unable to access telecommunications data; and the kinds of civil proceedings or circumstances where the Telecommunications Act 1997 No. 47 (Cth) should not apply. More...

Right to Information and Privacy Practitioners Network forum 15 February 2017 to 15 November 2017
View more: NSW Right to Information and Privacy Practitioners Network forum

New South Wales Consultations
17 March 2017 - Closing date for comments to the NSWLRC on Consultation Paper 18 - Dispute resolution: model provisions

NSW ICAC: Prosecution briefs with the DPP and outcomes
Tables showing outcomes of ICAC-related prosecutions and briefs with the Director of Public Prosecutions Updated 30 January 2017 Prosecution briefs with the DPP and outcomes

NCAT: Videos help make tribunal processes clearer
Four common issues presented in five different languages - NCAT has produced four videos that show people how to deal with four common matters that the tribunal's divisions hear (23 January 2017). More...

NSW Consultation: Dispute Resolution Model Provisions
The NSW Law Reform Commission has released for public comment Consultation Paper 18 - Dispute resolution: model provisions (December 2016). The Consultation Paper provides a set of draft model provisions related to mediation and some options for implementation including the possibility of applying them to non-statutory mediation. Comments close on 17 March 2017. More...

New Proclamation - Law Enforcement Conduct Commission Act
Certain provisions of the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission Act 2016 No. 61 (NSW) have been proclaimed by Statutory Rule 2017 No. 1 (NSW) to have commenced on 13 January 2017. This affects the Ombudsman Act 1974 No. 68 (NSW).

Published – articles, papers, reports

Australia's privacy laws gutted in court ruling on what is 'personal information'
Jake Goldenfein: 19 January 2017
In possibly Australia's most important privacy case to date, the Federal Court today dealt a severe blow to Australia's information privacy laws by narrowing the definition of "personal information". By reasoning that data is only "personal information" if a person is the actual subject matter of that information, the court's decision means "personal information" does not include data that only reveals identity if linked with other data.


Casenote: Privacy Commissioner v Telstra Corporation Limited [2017] FCAFC 4
The Full Federal Court has unanimously overturned an appeal from the Privacy Commissioner against Telstra in a case concerning customer access under the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) to "metadata" held by the company. While the case has a lengthy history, the appeal itself was determined on what Justice Kenny and Justice Edelman described as "a very narrow question of statutory construction concerning the meaning of the words "about an individual" as they applied in the Privacy Act prior to 12 March 2014" [at 5] (30 January 2017).

Re Culleton [2017] HCA 3
Constitutional law (Cth) – Judicial power – Election of Senator – Validity – Court of Disputed Returns – Power to hear petition – Whether non-judicial –Constitution, Ch III – Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth), Pt XXII, Div II. Practice and procedure – High Court of Australia – Failure to raise argument at hearing – Principles applicable – Validity – Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth), Pt XXII, Div II.

AIN v Medical Council of New South Wales [2017] NSWCATAP 23
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW – application under Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 – use and disclosure of personal information – duration of disclosure contravention - nature and content of disclosure - whether use as well as disclosure – errors of fact and law.

AIN v Medical Council of New South Wales [2017] NSWCATAP 22
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW – application under Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 – collection of personal information – meaning of lawful purpose – failure to exercise jurisdiction by not addressing Appellant's case on unlawfulness - disclosure of information – effect of non-publication order.

AIN v Medical Council of New South Wales [2017] NSWCATAP 21
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW – application under Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 – access to personal information – scope of application – meaning of s 14 of PPIP Act – identification of matters relevant to liability and remedy.

Harrington v Corrective Services New South Wales, Department of Justice [2017] NSWCATAD 46
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW; Disability Discrimination; direct discrimination; indirect discrimination; victimisation; application for dismissal under s 55 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013; lacking in substance; want of prosecution.

Edward Lee's Imports Pty Ltd v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2017] NSWCATOD 13
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – merits review - application for remittal at early stage of proceedings – relevant factors when exercising discretion to remit.

Purdie v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2017] NSWCATAD 38
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – review of decision to decline the grant of a tattoo parlour licence – adverse security determination by Commissioner of Police – what is the correct and preferable decision in relation to the licence application.

Sharkey v Minister Administering the Water Management Act 2000 [2017] NSWLEC 3
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: whether a specific question of statutory construction should be dealt with separately and before any residual factual issues requiring expert evidence – principles to be applied.

Meineke v Acting Chief Executive, Office of Local Government (No 2) [2017] NSWCATOD 14
CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL – Local Government Act 1993 – breach of Code of Conduct –– councillor retained to assist a client have his land compulsorily acquired by the Council of which he was a councillor – paid a standard fee rather than a success fee – one of a number of preconditions to this was having the Council designated in the Local Environmental Plan as the acquisition authority – appellant did not absent himself from two meetings and in relation to one meeting made no declaration –– misconduct established – decision of Respondent confirmed.

NSW Commissioner of Police v Keep Sydney Open Ltd [2017] NSWSC 5
PUBLIC ASSEMBLY – Protest against State Government "lock-out" laws affecting licensed premises – Application by Police Commissioner for Order under Summary Offences Act 1988 NSW, section 25(1) – Order made.

Acting Chief Executive, Office of Local Government v Passas (No 2) [2017] NSWCATOD 12
CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL – Local Government Act –misconduct of Local Government Councillor – Disruption to Council meetings – Unauthorised interaction with Council staff – disqualification ordered.

CGG v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2017] NSWCATAD 29
PRIVACY – Retention by Commissioner of Police of fingerprints obtained for security licensing purposes under the Security Industry Act 1997 (NSW) – Second applicant failed to apply for internal review – Tribunal lacks jurisdiction in respect of second applicant's application - Whether Commissioner exempt from compliance with amendment principle – Security Industry Act provides that Commissioner may use fingerprints obtained under that Act for any purpose and confers discretion to refuse application for destruction of fingerprints - Whether Security Industry Act reasonably contemplates non-compliance with obligation to delete personal information upon request where not relevant to purposes of collection and use - Whether Commissioner has contravened obligation to ensure first applicant's personal information kept for no longer than is necessary for the purposes for which it may lawfully be used – Whether power in Security Industry Act to use fingerprints for any purpose authorises use for purposes extraneous to that Act.

Marden v Pharmacy Council of New South Wales [2017] NSWCATAD 34
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION – Personal factors of application favouring disclosure – Applicant is pharmacist the subject of a complaint to which access is sought – Complainant has objected to disclosure including disclosure of complainant's identity - Public interest in applicant being provided with her personal information – Public interest in obtaining information to which individual entitled as matter of procedural fairness - To what extent information sought is applicant's personal information – To what extent applicant is entitled to information as a matter of procedural fairness – Procedural fairness only requires disclosure of substance of complaint - Public interest considerations against disclosure – Disclosure could reasonably be expected to reveal complainant's personal information – Whether scheme concerning the handling of complaints under the Health Care Complaints Act 1993 (NSW) has the effect that the complainant's information is not personal information - Whether the decision to refuse access to information is inconsistent with that scheme – Whether complainant knew that complainant's identity would be provided to applicant at time of making complaint – Public interest consideration against disclosure of complainant's personal information outweighs considerations in favour of disclosure of that information – Applicant otherwise entitled to access information in complaint.

Turner v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2017] NSWCATAD 33
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – access to government information – access application – whether information not held by agency - reasonableness of search.

McCurday v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2017] NSWCATAD 35
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW - tattoo parlours – tattoo operator licence - adverse security determination - fit and proper person - public interest.

Secretary, Department of Planning and Environment v AGL Energy Limited; Secretary, Department of Planning and Environment v AGL Upstream Infrastructure investments Pty Limited [2017] NSWLEC 2
SENTENCING – characterisation of offences – approach to consideration of offences collectively – offences with multiple failures to declare being toward the upper end of the range – offences with single failure to declare being in the middle of the range – accumulation and totality where multiple offences – fines imposed.
SENTENCING - publication orders – availability to be ordered when legislation providing for them came into force after commission of offences but before charges laid – legislative prohibition on retrospective application of increased penalty – are publication orders a penalty? – held publication orders are to be characterised as a penalty and not able to be required in these circumstances.
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – prosecutor's application for moiety of fines imposed – purpose for ordering such payment being to compensate for investigation and other expenses – statutory power now available to make additional order for such purposes – appropriate to make an order in present circumstances.

Commissioner of Police v Danis [2017] NSWCATAP 7
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION (PUBLIC ACCESS) – Agency refusal to deal with access application – Set aside by Tribunal – Appeal – Interpretation of agency discretion to refuse to deal with access application – Whether Tribunal's further order requiring agency to disclose within scope of proceedings. Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009, ss 58, 60(1)(d); Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997, s 65.

Seven Network v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2017] NSWCATAD 31
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION – Applicant withdrew proceedings for review of a decision to refuse access to information – Tribunal dismissed proceedings – Whether Tribunal has jurisdiction to review the decision the subject of the proceedings which have been dismissed – No power to renew or reinstate proceedings – Tribunal functus officio - No jurisdiction.

Mumby v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2017] NSWCATAD 27
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW - tattoo parlours – tattoo operator licence - adverse security determination - fit and proper person - public interest.

ALZ v SafeWork NSW (No 4) [2017] NSWCATAD 1
Privacy - information protection principle - personal information -Health information - Health Privacy Principle - retention and security safeguards - reasonable steps to prevent unauthorised access - psychological harm – damages.

Noble v University of New South Wales [2017] NSWCATAD 2
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION – Access to information in part of workplace report refused –Whether disclosure could reasonably be expected to prejudice the supply to the University of confidential information – Whether disclosure could reasonably be expected to reveal personal information – Weight to be given to competing considerations.


Proclamations commencing Acts

Law Enforcement Conduct Commission Act 2016 No 61 (2017-1) — published LW 13 January 2017.

Regulations and other miscellaneous instruments

Administrative Arrangements (Administration of Acts—General) Order 2017 (2017-17) — published LW 30 January 2017.

Administrative Arrangements (Administrative Changes—Ministers) Order 2017 (2017-18) — published LW 30 January 2017.

Administrative Arrangements (Interim Ministerial Changes) Order 2017 (2017-7) — published LW 23 January 2017.

This publication does not deal with every important topic or change in law and is not intended to be relied upon as a substitute for legal or other advice that may be relevant to the reader's specific circumstances. If you have found this publication of interest and would like to know more or wish to obtain legal advice relevant to your circumstances please contact one of the named individuals listed.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Christine Jones
Kim Nguyen
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions