Australia: Under section 561 Corporations Act, is the liquidator able to claim priority for remuneration, costs and expenses ahead of employee entitlements?

Last Updated: 16 February 2017
Article by Andrew Strazdins


The circulating security interest by way of floating charge had its origins in England in the 1870's. It has been observed that floating charges played an invaluable role in bridging the gap between business and finance. This was achieved by a legal mechanism under which a financier, typically a bank, was able to provide a company with funds on the security of assets that continued to be used and turned over by the company in the ordinary course of its business (being "circulating assets" as opposed to "fixed assets").

The security afforded by a circulating security interest on the circulating assets of a company, and the security holder's ability to enforce its security in the event of the company's winding up has not always been allowed to prevail. On occasions, the legislature has intervened to correct the perceived imbalance between the rights and interests of circulating security holders on winding up and the rights and interests of other claimants.

For the purposes of our discussion, we are concerned with the operation of section 561, Corporations Act and the extent to which that provision has allowed encroachment on the rights of a circulating security holder.

More specifically, our concern is with the situation that commonly arises where a liquidator, with the consent of the circulating security holder, is in control of security proceeds such that a decision will need to be made by the liquidator as to the manner in which those proceeds are to be distributed under section 561; and in particular whether the liquidator's remuneration, costs and expenses may be paid ahead of employee entitlements identified in section 561.

The operation of section 561, Corporations Act

In substance section 561 provides that where the non-charged assets of a company in winding up are insufficient to meet:

  • the entitlements owed to employees which by section 556 are given priority in a winding up; and
  • any amount being an advance to the company to pay employee entitlements which has a right of priority under section 560,

then payment of such claims may be made in priority over the claims of a secured party in relation to a circulating security interest created by the company, and may be made out of any property comprised in the circulating security interest.

Importantly, section 561 imposes a statutory obligation on a liquidator who, with the consent of the circulating security holder, is in control of secured assets to pay priority claims covered by the section if the relevant conditions are satisfied. In this regard the Federal Court in Cook (Liquidator), in the matter of Italiano Family Fruit Company Pty Ltd (in liq) v Italiano Family Fruit Company Pty Ltd (in liq) (2010) FCA 1355 observed:

"It necessarily follows that the controller is required to withhold funds from the secured creditor that are sufficient to pay priority creditors if it appears that the company's property is likely to be insufficient. In these respects s 561 mandates an incursion into the proprietary rights of the secured creditor."

Does section 561 allow the remuneration, costs and expenses of the liquidator to be met from circulating security proceeds ahead of employee entitlements and the rights of the circulating security holder?

This is an important question for there would appear to be uncertainty among liquidators as to the priority of the liquidator's remuneration, costs and expenses in the circumstances under discussion. It is apparent that the answer to this question will largely turn on the proper interpretation of section 561.

It is unfortunate that at the present time there is no authoritative Australian case law directly on point. It may be noted, however, that in Saker, in the matter of Great Southern Limited (2014) FCA 771, the Federal Court had occasion to consider the operation of section 561, however, in circumstances where receivers were appointed concurrently with liquidators.

In the case receivers appointed under circulating security interests had transferred to the liquidators funds deducted from security proceeds with a view to the liquidators meeting employee claims under section 561. Subsequently the claim of the circulating security holder was paid and the receivership terminated.

Here the Court directed that the liquidators would be acting properly by distributing the company's funds (including those transferred by the receivers) in accordance with section 556 priorities, which meant that the liquidators could recover their remuneration, costs and expenses from the funds on hand. However, the Court further directed that such distribution was "subject to (the liquidators) satisfying themselves that section 561 had been complied with." This meant that in the event employee entitlements were not met by the liquidators' distribution the liquidators would be obliged to seek further funds from the receivers in order to satisfy the employee entitlements pursuant to section 561. As a consequence, the case did not directly address the question presently under consideration.

Perhaps the most useful case dealing with the situation where the liquidator, being in control of circulating security proceeds, seeks to determine whether the liquidator's remuneration, costs and expenses may be paid from those proceeds ahead of employee claims, can be found in Buchler v Talbot (2004) UKHL 9. This is a decision of the House of Lords dealing with the UK equivalent of section 561.

Here the House of Lords concluded that the language of the UK section (in terms similar to section 561) was unequivocal as to the claims that could be met from floating charge/circulating security proceeds. As a result there were no grounds for implying an additional incursion, such as liquidation expenses, into the security holder's rights in respect of their charged property. It was observed that:

"The fact that liquidation expenses enjoy priority over the claims of preferential creditors in a winding up is not of itself a reason for according to liquidation expenses the like priority in respect of charged assets... according a like priority in respect of liquidation expenses would represent a potentially major additional incursion into the proprietary interests of debenture holders" (para 16).

Does the principle in Universal Distributing apply?

Although denying priority to liquidation general expenses, including liquidator's remuneration, the House of Lords had regard to the "practicalities involved" in applying their decision.

In particular it was recognized that costs incurred by the liquidator in realizing charged assets are payable ahead of the floating charge/circulating security holder's claims, as opposed to general expenses incurred by the liquidator for purposes not associated with realizing the charged assets. In addition the liquidator's costs and expenses incurred in identifying preferential creditors and paying them pursuant to the statutory obligation will be payable ahead of the security holder "just as much as they would be if the debenture holder... had incurred costs and expenses in discharging this statutory duty" (para 19).

This recognition is consistent with numerous Australian authorities applying the principle in Universal Distributing (see, for example, Stewart v Atco Controls Pty Ltd (in liq) (2014) HCA 15). The underlying rationale of this principle is that it is inequitable to claim the benefit of the protection or realization of charged assets without recognizing the liquidator's costs, expenses and fees incurred in producing those outcomes. Typically, cases involving these issues arise as a result of the mutual cooperation of the liquidator and the secured creditor, with the latter seeking to take the benefit of the liquidator's work and expertise in realizing the charged assets.

UK legislative developments following the House of Lords decision in Buchler v Talbot: A possible future direction for section 561?

In 2008, the UK Government took the opportunity to reverse the House of Lords decision in Buchler v Talbot with the insertion into the Insolvency Act 1986 of section 176ZA. This section provides that where non-charged assets are insufficient to pay the expenses of winding up, the proceeds of assets subject to a floating charge/circulating security will be available to meet those expenses, in priority to the claims of the security holder and to preferential creditors entitled to be paid in priority to the security holder.

In justifying the reversal of the House of Lords decision, the UK legislature recognized that where there is a floating charge/circulating security it has been accepted that in appropriate cases charged assets do not solely protect the interests of the security holder. The costs and expenses of winding up have always carried a high priority such that it was perceived by the UK legislature to be incongruous that any curtailing of the security holder's rights did not also extend to such a high ranking priority as the costs and expenses of winding up.

The obvious question arising from these UK developments is whether our section 561 should be amended to similarly reflect the UK reasoning.

Note: On reversal of the Buchler v Talbot decision circulating security holders voiced a concern that liquidators would be given a free rein to use their charged assets to fund speculative recovery actions for the benefit of unsecured creditors. Consequently, new rules were introduced giving effect to an approval regime with respect to the liquidator's litigation expenses. Under these rules, it will not be possible for litigation expenses above a prescribed threshold to be paid from circulating security proceeds without the approval of the security holder, or a preferential creditor entitled to be paid in priority to the floating charge holder, or the court.

Concluding comments

As a result of the unequivocal terms of section 561, Corporations Act 2001 it is suggested that there is no ground for implying incursion of a liquidator's remuneration, costs and expenses into a circulating security holder's rights, except to the extent allowed under the principle in Universal Distributing. The fact that, when distributing the proceeds of non-charged assets, other claimants may rank ahead of employee entitlements is not a reason for transporting those claims into section 561 ahead of employee claims and the rights of the circulating security holder.

This outcome may well result in claims that usually rank ahead of employee entitlements, such as the winding up applicant's costs, or the general costs and expenses of the liquidator, not being met, with a lower ranking priority, namely, employee entitlements, being paid ahead of those higher ranking claims from funds that would otherwise vest in the circulating security holder.

If this outcome is perceived to be incongruous and not in the public interest then changes to the operation of section 561, with further encroachment of the circulating security holder's rights, will need to be brought about by legislative intervention as occurred in the UK, and not by doubtful interpretation of the unequivocal language of section 561.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.