Australia: The Fair Work Commission - has it lost its way?

Last Updated: 16 February 2017
Article by Swaab Author

Trust - the key ingredient

There is no mystery as to what lies at the heart of healthy staff/management relationships in a business – the key is trust! (See my December post)

So, what happens to employment opportunities in our country when the business community loses faith in the Fair Work Commission - the institution established to umpire those relationships?

The Commission is charged with responsibility for upholding the objects of the Fair Work Act, including making decisions in a manner that are "fair and just" with outcomes that ensure flexibility "...for businesses, [and] promotes productivity and economic growth for Australia's future economic prosperity".

Well, according to one of its most senior members, the Fair Work Commission has so profoundly failed this object that he could not – in good conscience - continue as one its most senior members. This month, VP Graeme Watson will quit the Fair Work Commission in disgust. According to The Australian newspaper, the ex-top-tier law firm partner and soon-to-be-former vice-president of the Commission highlighted the lack of expertise of many of the Commissioners and an overall lack of understanding of the impact of their decisions on jobs in the community.

It's easy to understand why many Australian businesses have lost their faith in the Fair Work Commission, when Commissioners regularly make decisions that seem to favour employees who are incompetent or seriously disobedient. Decisions that regularly endanger the safety or ongoing employment prospects of their co-workers and the viability of the business.

This loss of faith in the Fair Work Commission can have real implications for the wider workforce. I recently posted an excerpt from the Wall Street Journal outlining the dramatic trend towards outsourcing in businesses – a trend which is reflected within Australia...

I understand that making decisions that weigh employees' right to fairness with the needs of businesses to function and prosper, is not straightforward. However, VP's Watson's view that the Fair Work Commission can often be partisan in its decisions in favour of employees, is not made in a vacuum.

'Your Honour - may I tender Exhibits A and B'

Let's look at two recent examples that clearly exemplify this loss of balance in the Commission:

A case in Victoria, where a male nurse:

  • posted and tagged to fellow employees a video which showed an obese woman in underwear engaged in an act with clear sexual overtones with a male also in his underwear – and sent it to a colleague with the title "getting slammed by [female colleague] at work yesterday"
  • left blobs of Sorbolene together with crumpled tissues on a male colleague's desk
  • when an investigation was carried out, contacted his colleagues (contrary to an explicit direction from management) and told them not to co-operate with the investigation (using, it might be noted, abusive language in that communication).

Commissioner Bissett found that it was a "serious matter", that the nurse's actions had exposed two colleagues to "humiliation and potential ridicule at work" and constituted a "valid reason" for termination and – indeed – that she "could appreciate why Bendigo Health reached the conclusion it did". Nevertheless, she decided that the employer was not entitled to terminate the employee.

In other words, even though the employee:

  • exposed the employer to potential claims for hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages,
  • showed a complete disregard for the feelings and emotional well-being of his co-workers,
  • had sexually harassed another employee by associating her with the woman in the video, and
  • disregarded explicit management instructions crucial to the integrity of the investigation,

Commissioner Bissett found that the employer should have given the employee another go. What further havoc might that employee have caused if the employer had not terminated him but had adopted the Commissioner's approach?

I do not doubt that Commissioner Bissett believed in a fair go for the employee who had been terminated. However, it difficult to see in her decision, a similar concern for the fellow employees.

In another recent decision, Commissioner Hunt in a workplace performance case (unfortunately involving an HR Manager), exhibited a similar ignorance of the commercial and legal risks posed to a business by an employee's consistently underperformance and its potential impact on the employee's colleagues.

The facts were simple: the HR manager, after many months of failing in her role, had made a mess of a pre-audit process - causing a huge amount of additional work for those around her - and had been terminated before the full audit took place.

The Commissioner found that:

  • the employer had met with the HR manager "... on a number of occasions to address with her the various shortcomings that he considered she had ... [but] ... unfortunately [the employee] had not adequately improved her performance"
  • the issues raised with the employee shortly before her termination were "... important, serious matters that demonstrate [she] was not adequately performing her role. None of them are trivial or petty."

Despite this, Commissioner Hunt decided that the employer should have allowed the employee to carry out the actual audit - despite the likelihood of her making a mess of it. In fact, the Commissioner said that only after the employee had failed with the audit (with all its potentially disastrous implications for the business and additional stress on fellow workers), should the employee have been terminated.

Commissioner Hunt's approach to this case involving an employee who "was not adequately performing her role" displays a concerning lack of insight as to the potential for a failed audit to threaten the jobs of competent and committed staff. In the real world, a failed audit can have serious consequences – not the least for the ongoing employment of other staff.

Why Commissioner Hunt's apparent indifference to this commercial reality lends credence to VP Watson's trenchant criticism of the Fair Work Commission.

It's (not) all about the terminated employee

I understand that 'fairness' is a subjective matter.

I am also aware that employers are not always going to like the decisions of the Commission.

However, what most concerns me is how often (and these cases were good examples):

  • the debilitating impact of employee poor performance (week in - week out) or
  • the effect of dangerous or offensive employee misconduct on fellow staff,

is glossed over by the Commissioners in their decisions.

Equally the Commissioners so often seem to disregard the risk of huge fines or compensation claims that lie with the employer and personally its managers, if the employer allows such conduct to persist.

Finally, so seldom do Commissioners acknowledge in any way the future impact of such behaviour on the viability of the jobs of existing staff or potential employees.

Importantly, Commissioners are required to take into account '... any other matters that the FWC considers relevant' (s.387(h)) in considering an unfair dismissal claim. The threat that the terminated worker would have posed to the job security of other staff and the legal risks faced by the employer and management, had the worker been allowed to continue in the role, are surely relevant matters in deciding whether the employer was entitled to terminate the worker. Yet, in their unfair dismissal decisions, too many of the Commissioners focus almost exclusively on the impact of the termination on the personal circumstances of the employee.

Personal responsibility is at the heart of trust

I have highlighted many times in my articles, the need for the Commission to recognise the importance of employees' personal responsibility within a workplace. However, in their decisions, few of the Commissioners seem to disclose any real understanding of the consequences of permitting a lack of accountability to be the key note feature of Australian workplaces. This leaves employers with little confidence that they can safely take any meaningful action to deal appropriately with the minority of staff who do not conduct themselves productively and respectfully in the workplace.

In seeking to save the jobs of the unworthy few, Commissioners endanger the jobs of the deserving many

In the shadow of decisions like this, who can blame employers for weighing up whether to employ people directly or outsource the role?

Having read such cases – if your capital (or that entrusted by others) was on the line, what would you do?

A Commissioner's job is not always easy - balancing the competing interests of the employer and the employee. Yet, in Graeme Watson's view, too many of the Commissioners in the current Fair Work Commission have lost that sense of balance, defaulting too often in favour of giving the bullying or dishonest employee another opportunity to behave badly.

Without that balance in its decision making, the Fair Work Commission too often seems to tacitly endorse a culture of poor performance amongst employees. A culture where behaviour that endangers the well-being of other staff or the viability of the business is excused. This inability to find that balance endangers the job opportunities of tens of thousands of committed, competent and responsible Australian workers, as employers become reluctant to take on the risks of employing staff.

After all if they perceive that the Fair Work Commission is prone to penalise them for taking meaningful steps to protect the well-being of other staff (and their jobs), why would a business be enthusiastic about expanding job opportunities?

Is it any wonder that VP Watson was so scathing in his criticisms of the functioning of the Fair Work Commission in its current form?

"There is an increasing understanding in the business community that the Fair Work Commission is partisan, dysfunctional and divided"

For further information please contact:

Warick Ryan, Partner
Phone: +61 2 9233 5544

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions