Australia: Case Note Brighton-le-Sands Amateur Fisherman´s Association Limited v Vasilios Koromvokis

Last Updated: 7 December 2007
Article by Kate Blue

[2007] NSWCA 331

Giles JA, Tobias JA and Handley AJA

In Brief

  • The Court of Appeal had to determine whether the correct process of reasoning was undertaken by the trial judge in respect of the trial judge's finding of the defendant's negligence where the plaintiff fell on slipway rails.

Background Circumstances

  • The plaintiff who was 75 years old at the time of the accident fell on a set of slip rails at the defendant's boat shed.
  • The plaintiff arrived at the boat shed at 5.30am when it was still dark. He proceeded through the slipway gates and across three sets of slip rails to the ice room where he collected approximately 15 kg of ice in a 20 kg capacity bucket. On the return journey to his car he fell on one of the slip rails. The plaintiff said that he was looking down at the rails as he stepped over them but he could not see them because it was dark and they were rusted and black. Although it was the plaintiff's case at trial that there was no lighting or illumination the trial judge found that the plaintiff was mistaken in relation to the state of lighting at the time of his fall and that the defendant had provided adequate lighting.

District Court Decision

  • In finding for the plaintiff, Judge McLoughlin made a number of findings including the following:
    1. the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty to take reasonable care for his safety in traversing the slipway, whether by day or by night, in order to gain access to the ice room;
    2. the defendant had provided adequate lighting to the area;
    3. the danger could have been removed by the installation of a concrete ramp leading up to and across each set of slip rails, which would have permitted the three sets of rails to be traversed without each rail having to be negotiated by stepping over it, and by painting the rails yellow;
    4. the plaintiff failed to recognise the difficulty of traversing the slip rails burdened by the weight of up to 20 kg of ice given his advanced years;
    5. the plaintiff in his desire to have the ice on his boat and launch his boat, momentarily overlooked the difficulty in traversing the slipway rails on his return journey, because of his age and because he was carrying a very heavy bucket of ice;
    6. the plaintiff was unaware that carrying the ice would make it more difficult for him to traverse the railings upon which he fell. As such his Honour expressed the view that the presumption of awareness of the relevant risk had been rebutted;
    7. his Honour found that given the description of the slipway, the risk of bumping into or tripping over a sliprail was one which was obvious within the meaning of s 5F of the Civil Liability Act 2002 and that the plaintiff was aware of the risk. However his Honour considered this was not a warning case and that the risk could easily have been removed by the use of concrete ramping and yellow illuminating paint replacing the dark bold rusty finish that was in existence at the time of the plaintiff's fall;
    8. in February 2004 when the defendant's premises were being reconstructed and/or renovated, a concrete ramp to enable the sliprails to be traversed without stepping over each one was installed and the rails, where they passed through the concrete apron, were painted yellow. However his Honour stated the evidence did not establish that this work was carried out as a consequence of the accident that befell the plaintiff.

    • Therefore the defendant was in breach of its duty of care to the plaintiff.

    • The defendant appealed the decision on the basis that the trial judge had failed to apply the "balancing" principles in accordance with the decision of Wyong Shire Council v Shirt (1980) 146 CLR 40. The defendant also contended that his Honour erred by failing to give adequate reasons as to the "dominant" consideration in determining whether the defendant had breached his duty of care to the plaintiff, namely, the obviousness of the risk confronting the plaintiff.

    Court of Appeal Decision

  • The Court of Appeal upheld the appeal, and held that the trial judge had failed to correctly apply the principles set out in Wyong Shire Council v Shirt.
    • Tobias JA who delivered the unanimous verdict considered the trial judge's reasoning was difficult to follow and erroneous. Tobias JA stated this was because the trial judge asked himself the wrong question. In particular, having accepted that there was a duty upon the defendant to take reasonable care for the safety of the plaintiff, given its knowledge that its elderly members traversed the three sets of sliprails in order to access the ice room so that it was reasonably foreseeable that such persons might trip over one of the exposed sliprails, his Honour failed to determine the reasonable response of a person in the position of the defendant to that risk.
    • The trial judge failed to recognise that the defendant did not owe a duty of care to its members to ensure that no harm befell them when traversing the slipway area but only a duty to take reasonable care. Secondly, the relevant enquiry is prospective and not retrospective. It is wrong to focus exclusively upon the particular way in which the accident came about.
    • The enquiry into breach, although made after the accident, must attempt to answer what response a reasonable person, confronted with a foreseeable risk of injury, would have made to that risk. One of the possible answers to that enquiry must be "nothing".
    • The law as it currently stands in relation to an occupier's duty of care is set out by the High Court in the Shirt decision and was reaffirmed in Wyong Shire Council v Vairy (2005) 223 CLR 422. Those decisions are authority for the proposition that breach of duty needs to be considered in light of what a reasonable person would have done to avoid the risk of reasonably foreseeable injury.
    • The factors to be taken into account when applying the Shirt principle include a consideration of the magnitude of the risk and the degree of the probability of its occurrence.
    • Tobias JA stated it could be fairly said in the present case that the magnitude of the risk was neither high nor low in that a person tripping on a sliprail and falling was likely to sustain some injury to himself or herself but not necessarily one that was catastrophic. On the other hand, the probability of its occurrence in the present case was low given that the evidence was that there had been no similar incident in the memory of those who gave evidence.
    • Obviousness of the risk within the meaning of s 5F of the Civil Liability Act to the plaintiff was irrelevant other than for the purposes of s 5G of the Act or on the issue of contributory negligence. Obviousness to the defendant, however, was of relevance in considering the probability of occurrence of the risk in question for the purposes of applying the Shirt formula.
    • The Court of Appeal confirmed that the obviousness of a risk of injury is not determinative of breach of duty. The fact that a risk was obvious does not necessarily exculpate a defendant in circumstances where the plaintiff may not have been aware of the risk. This approach was affirmed by the High Court in Roads & Traffic Authority of NSW v Dederer [2007] HCA 42 where the High Court held that a breach of duty needs to be considered in light of what a reasonable person would have done to avoid the risk of injury. This approach places emphasis on whether a defendant's response to the risk of injury was reasonable and is consistent with the principles in Shirt.
    • than one of reasonable care. Given that the determination of breach of duty must be one which is determined prospectively and not retrospectively without the benefit of hindsight, in his Honour's opinion the exercise of reasonable care did not require the defendant to take any steps to eliminate the relevant risk other than that which it had already taken, namely, to ensure that the relevant area of the slipway was fully illuminated at night.
    • His Honour stated it followed from the foregoing that the primary judge erred in failing to apply the Shirt formula in order to determine whether the defendant was in breach of its duty of care to the plaintiff. Had he done so, he ought to have concluded that the failure of the defendant to provide an access ramp across the sliprails in order to provide a level surface for persons such as the plaintiff to traverse and/or its failure to define the height of the sliprails by painting them with phosphorescent paint, given that the rails were clearly visible both during the daytime and at night, did not constitute a breach of that duty.
    • Accordingly the appeal was allowed.


  • The process of reasoning applied in the Shirt formula remains the guiding principle in the law of negligence, namely that breach of duty needs to be considered in light of what a reasonable person would have done to avoid the risk of reasonably foreseeable injury.
    • This case confirms that the determination of breach of duty must be determined prospectively and not retrospectively without the benefit of hindsight and that one cannot look at steps taken by a defendant after an incident to argue that it was unreasonable for a defendant not to have adopted that course in order to eliminate the relevant risk.
    • The fact that steps were later taken out by the defendant, for reasons unconnected with the plaintiff's accident, to install a concrete ramp to enable the sliprails to be traversed without stepping over each one and were painted yellow, even if this work was a direct result of the Plaintiff's accident, was not determinative of liability. In this regard s 5C (c) of the Civil Liability Act provides that the subsequent taking of action that would (had the action been taken earlier) have avoided a risk of harm does not of itself give rise to or affect liability in respect of the risk and does not of itself constitute an admission of liability in connection with the risk.

    The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

    To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

    Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

    Some comments from our readers…
    “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
    “I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
    “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

    Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
    Up-coming Events Search
    Font Size:
    Mondaq on Twitter
    Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
    This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
    Email Address
    Company Name
    Confirm Password
    Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
     Law Performance
     Law Practice
     Media & IT
     Real Estate
     Wealth Mgt
    Asia Pacific
    European Union
    Latin America
    Middle East
    United States
    Worldwide Updates
    Check to state you have read and
    agree to our Terms and Conditions

    Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

    Use of

    You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


    Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

    The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


    Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

    • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
    • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
    • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

    Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

    If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

    If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

    Information Collection and Use

    We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

    We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

    Mondaq News Alerts

    In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


    A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

    Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

    Log Files

    We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


    This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

    Surveys & Contests

    From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


    If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


    This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

    Correcting/Updating Personal Information

    If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

    Notification of Changes

    If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

    How to contact Mondaq

    You can contact us with comments or queries at

    If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.