Australia: NSW Government Bulletin - 12 October 2016

Last Updated: 19 October 2016
Article by Christine Jones and Kim Nguyen
Most Read Contributor in Australia, September 2018

Obeid & Ors v Ipp & Ors [2016] NSWSC 1376

On 27 September 2016, Justice Hammerschlag of the Supreme Court of NSW handed down the decision of Obeid & Ors v Ipp & Ors [2016] NSWSC 1376.

The proceedings were brought by Edward Obeid Snr, Moses Obeid, Paul Obeid and Edward Obeid Jnr against the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC), former ICAC Commissioner, Counsel assisting the Commissioner and two ICAC investigators, in relation to 'Operation Jasper'. The plaintiffs alleged that they were denied procedural fairness from ICAC and that the defendants engaged in the tort of public misfeasance. However, the plaintiffs were ultimately unsuccessful on all counts.

No interest in proceedings

Firstly, Edward Obeid Jnr's claims were dismissed because the ICAC report did not make any findings against him. The Court noted he had no interest in the proceedings and no attempt was made to identify his interest in the proceedings.

Procedural fairness

As a finding of corrupt conduct may have devastating effects on a person and their reputation, ICAC must afford procedural fairness to persons who may be adversely affected by ICAC's findings.

The plaintiffs claimed they were denied procedural fairness on multiple grounds, one being because ICAC did not disclose certain matters to them and accordingly, the plaintiffs were denied the opportunity of leading evidence, making submissions and changing the outcome of the inquiry.

The Court held that the failure to disclose to the plaintiffs certain matters did not deny the plaintiffs an adequate opportunity to be heard or a possibility of a successful outcome for the following reasons:

  • the plaintiffs were provided with sufficient opportunity to be heard and to deal with the issue;
  • even if the matters were disclosed, the plaintiffs would not have taken a different course; and
  • there was no alternative course practically open to the plaintiffs which could have led to different outcome.

Public misfeasance

The plaintiffs claimed damages from ICAC, the former Commissioner, Counsel assisting ICAC and the two ICAC investigators for public misfeasance in public office. Misfeasance in public office is when damage is suffered, caused by an act done by a public officer in excess of authority, with the intention of causing harm to a plaintiff. Alternatively, it is when the public officer knows (or ought to know) the act is beyond power and involves a foreseeable risk of harm.

The plaintiffs' claims for public misfeasance failed against all of the defendants for the following reasons:

  • In relation to ICAC, the Court found that because the plaintiffs were not denied procedural fairness, ICAC did not engage in public misfeasance. The Court also stated that there was a live question about whether ICAC (as it is not an individual) could commit a tort and noted that this may turn on the particular power being exercised by it. Furthermore, given the personal nature of the tort, there was difficulty in accepting the plaintiffs' submission that the state of mind of ICAC employees or Counsel assisting ICAC should be attributed to ICAC.
  • In relation to the Commissioner, the plaintiffs could not establish that the Commissioner, in making a suppression order, acted beyond power or was recklessly indifferent as to whether he was in excess of power.
  • In relation to Counsel assisting, the Court found amongst other things that he did not hold public office and did not hold any public power.
  • In relation to the ICAC investigators, the Court found that they did not hold public office. Furthermore and although it was unnecessary to consider, whilst the investigators knowingly acted in excess of their powers, the plaintiffs did not prove that they suffered any damage.

NSW Government Lawyers Linkedin Group

To start a conversation about Government Bulletin or issues of interest to NSW government lawyers, join the LinkedIn group NSW Government Lawyers by clicking on this link. Membership is open to those employed in the public sector.

In the media

NSW Premier Mike Baird admits he 'got it wrong' after backflip on greyhound racing ban
New South Wales Premier Mike Baird says he ditched a ban on greyhounds because he "got it wrong" and believes the majority of the community wants the industry to have a second chance (11 October 2016). More...

Greyhound racing given one final chance under toughest regulations in the country
The NSW Government will give in principle support for greyhound racing to have one final chance in NSW, subject to industry agreeing to the strictest regulations that exist anywhere in the country to clamp down on animal cruelty (11 October 2016). More...

NSW rural councils lose merger case, pay costs
NSW rural councils have been dealt a serious blow to their hopes of preventing the state government forcibly merging them with their neighbours and they have been ordered to pay the state government's court costs (07 October 2016). More...

Relaxation of Drone Regulation in Australia
On 29 September 2016, changes to the regulation of "remote piloted aircraft systems", brought about by the provisions of the Civil Aviation Legislation Amendment (Part 101) Regulation 2016 [CTH] (the Regulations), came into effect, leading to increased privacy concerns and collision (04 October 2016). Relaxation of Drone Regulation in Australia

Judges admit to emotion in court but say they avoid bias
Australian judges and magistrates admit to experiencing strong personal feelings toward cases they have presided over, new research finds (29 September 2016). Judges admit to emotion in court but say they avoid bias

Appointment of Australian Information Commissioner and Privacy Commissioner
The Government will recommend to His Excellency the Governor-General of Australia, General the Honourable Sir Peter Cosgrove AK MC (Ret'd), the appointment of Timothy Pilgrim PSM as Australian Information Commissioner and his reappointment as Australian Privacy Commissioner (28 September 2016). Appointment of Australian Information Commissioner and Privacy Commissioner

The impact of the NSW Bail Act 2013 on trends in bail
The NSW Bail Act (2013) and subsequent amendments have had only a modest effect on the percentage of defendants refused bail, according to BOCSAR. The Act replaced a complex set of presumptions concerning bail with a single 'unacceptable risk' test (26 September 2016). The impact of the NSW Bail Act 2013 on trends in bail

In practice and courts

NSW IPC: revised learning module to assist compliance with contract registers under the GIPA Act - 05 October 2016
The Acting NSW Information Commissioner has updated the learning module on contract registers to provide guidance to entities regulated by the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (GIPA Act). This resource has been revised in consultation with our stakeholders to assist agencies in understanding how to comply with their contracts register obligations under the GIPA Act. Click here to register to complete Contracts Registers under the GIPA Act.

NSW IPC: new Open Data resource launched – 28 September 2016
the Open Data: Opening our World infographic to provide users with a simple explanation of Open Data and how it can be used to enhance the way we live and work. Click here to view the Open Data: Opening our World infographic featuring case studies and examples of how Open Data has been used to enhance the way we live and work.

ICAC: Prosecution briefs with the DPP and outcomes
Tables showing outcomes of ICAC-related prosecutions and briefs with the Director of Public Prosecutions, updated 7 October 2016. Prosecution briefs with the DPP and outcomes

ICAC: Register now for Australia's premier investigators and complaint handlers forum
Registration is now open for the 11th National Investigations Symposium to be held 9 to 11 November 2016 at the Four Seasons, Sydney. Register now for Australia's premier investigators and complaint handlers forum

NSW IPC: Australia's Information Commissioners commend citizens' Right to Know
This year, Australia's State and Commonwealth Information Commissioners have joined together to promote their commitment to the importance of Open Government and the right to access government-held information and data on International Right to Know Day, 28 September 2016. More...

Have your say: revenge porn offence in NSW
The NSW Government has started consultation on plans to criminalise "revenge porn", the distribution of intimate or sexually explicit images without consent. The NSW Government invites interested individuals and organisations to respond to the issues raised in this discussion paper. A discussion paper will be available until 21 October 2016 at

Published – articles, papers, reports

Impacts of changes to trading hours of liquor licences on alcohol-related harm: a systematic review 2005–2015
Public Health Research & Practice: 30 September 2016 - Claire Wilkinson, Michael Livingston, Robin Room. This paper outlines a systematic review of the literature to examine recent (2005–2015) research about the impact of changing the hours of sale of alcohol on alcohol-related harms. More...

The revised group risk assessment model (GRAM 2): assessing risk of reoffending among adults given non-custodial sanctions
Efty Stavrou, Suzanne Poynton; NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research: 29 September 2016. Out of 81,199 adult offenders, 26% reoffended within two years of the index appearance. More...

What's causing the growth in Indigenous imprisonment in NSW?
NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research: 28 September 2016 Examines the rise in the NSW Indigenous prison population. More...

A follow-up on the impact of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW) on trends in bail
NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research: 26 September 2016
The Bail Act 2013 (NSW) and subsequent amendments appeared to have an effect on the number and proportion of bail eligible defendants refused bail. More...


Turner v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2016] NSWCATAD 222
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – access to government information – access application – previous request – decision to refuse to deal with application.

CCC v Department of Family and Community Services [2016] NSWCATAD 225
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW – review of decision of the respondent to remove three foster children from the day-to-day care of authorised carers and to cancel the authorisation of those carers.

Oberon Council v Minister for Local Government; Cabonne Shire Council v Minister for Local Government; McAlister and Graham v Minister for Local Government [2016] NSWLEC 131
JUDICIAL REVIEW – proposals for amalgamation of local government areas – whether proposals made in accordance with Local Government Act 1993 – whether proposals made by Minister – whether decision to make proposals manifestly unreasonable – referral of proposals to Departmental Chief Executive for examination and report – whether referral of proposals manifestly unreasonable – inquiries required to be held – whether reasonable public notice given of the holding of inquiries – whether inquiries held in accordance with Act – whether examination and report on proposals in accordance with Act – whether Departmental Chief Executive had regard to relevant considerations in s 263(3) of Act – whether affected councils denied procedural fairness by Departmental Chief Executive – review and comment on Departmental Chief Executive's reports by Boundaries Commission – whether review conducted in accordance with Act – whether affected councils denied procedural fairness by Boundaries Commission – publicly accessible material in support of proposals represented that analysis and modelling of consultant was independent – whether representations misleading – whether allegedly misleading representations invalidated statutory process of amalgamation – whether Minister made decisions under Act to recommend implementation of proposals to Governor – whether Minister's decision to recommend to Governor that a proposal be implemented was invalid.

Spice v Mosman Council [2016] NSWCATAD 215
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW –– access to government information – deliberative process of government or agency – overriding public interest against disclosure.

Edward Moses Obeid Snr -v- David Andrew Ipp [2016] NSWSC 1376
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — STATUTES — Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 (NSW) ("the Act") — inquiry into allegations of corruption — requirement to provide procedural fairness to potentially affected persons — claim by the plaintiffs for declaratory relief that they were denied procedural fairness by reason of the non-disclosure of a number of specified matters — HELD: denial of procedural fairness not established — the plaintiffs had an adequate opportunity to deal with the relevant subject matter — the plaintiffs were not deprived of the possibility of a successful outcome. TORT — Misfeasance in public office — requirements for liability — whether defendants held public office — whether they knowingly or recklessly exceeded powers — whether they were reckless as to whether plaintiffs would suffer damage — whether plaintiffs suffered damage — CLAIM that ICAC committed misfeasance by knowingly denying procedural fairness — HELD: plaintiffs not denied procedural fairness — damage not established — CLAIM that Commissioner committed misfeasance in public office by making a suppression order which he knew he had no power to make — HELD: not established that the Commissioner had no power — not established that the Commissioner knew he had no power — no damage established — CLAIM that Counsel Assisting committed misfeasance in public office by cross-examining on a knowingly false premise — HELD: Counsel Assisting did not occupy public office — existence of false premise not established — no damage established — Counsel Assisting entitled to barristers' immunity — CLAIM that ICAC investigators who executed search warrant committed misfeasance in public office by causing videotaping of documents outside search warrant — HELD: investigators executing search warrant did not hold public office — held they did knowingly engage in conduct beyond power — knowledge or recklessness of damage to be suffered not established — no damage established.


Bills assented to
Criminal Procedure Amendment (Summary Proceedings for Indictable Offences) Act 2016 No 44 — Assented to 28 September 2016.

Regulations and other miscellaneous instruments
Administrative Arrangements (Administration of Acts—Amendment No 2) Order 2016 (2016-611) — published LW 7 October 2016.

This publication does not deal with every important topic or change in law and is not intended to be relied upon as a substitute for legal or other advice that may be relevant to the reader's specific circumstances. If you have found this publication of interest and would like to know more or wish to obtain legal advice relevant to your circumstances please contact one of the named individuals listed.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Christine Jones
Kim Nguyen
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions