Australia: Australian Company Directors Caught Between A Rock And A Hard Place

A recent Federal Court of Australia judgment highlights the predicament faced by directors being pursued in civil proceedings when there is the prospect that they may be facing criminal prosecution for offences arising out of substantially the same conduct.


This scenario is most frequently encountered in the context of civil penalty proceedings brought against directors.  Civil penalty provisions are hybrid sanctions combining both civil and criminal remedies imposed under Part 9.4B of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).  Civil penalty proceedings can be brought by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), while criminal prosecutions are brought by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions.

When hearing civil proceedings for a declaration of contravention, pecuniary penalty order, disqualification order or company compensation, courts must apply the usual rules of civil evidence and procedure.  Under these rules, the standard of proof is the balance of probabilities.  In criminal matters, however, the prosecution bears the legal burden of proving every element beyond reasonable doubt.

No civil proceedings under the Corporations Act are to be stayed merely because the proceedings disclose, or arise out of, the commission of an offence.1  However, a court must not make a declaration of a contravention or pecuniary penalty order against a person who has already been convicted of an offence constituted by substantially the same conduct.2  This bar on subsequent proceedings was introduced to address "double jeopardy" concerns raised due to directors' and officers' facing exposure to both civil and criminal penalties for the same contravention.

This does not prevent criminal proceedings being commenced after civil penalty proceedings have been finalised,3 but any evidence given in the civil penalty proceedings is inadmissible in the criminal proceedings.  

If criminal proceedings are commenced during civil penalty proceedings, the civil proceedings will be stayed.4

When a criminal prosecution is "on the cards"

The legislature does not address what should happen if a director or officer being pursued in civil proceedings is faced with the prospect of a criminal prosecution being commenced against them, but charges have yet to be laid. 

In Australian Securities & Investments Commission v HLP Financial Planning (Aust) Pty Ltd 5, a criminal prosecution of the director was "on the cards".  The court declined to entertain the application for declaratory relief and stood the matter over until a final decision was taken as to whether the director would be prosecuted.  The court said that if the director was to be charged it would dismiss the proceeding against him and leave it to the criminal court to decide his fate.  On the other hand, if the decision was not to lay charges, the civil proceeding could resume.

In Australian Securities & Investments Commission v Flugge 6, the court held that s 1317N of the Corporations Act did not preclude a stay of civil proceedings when criminal proceedings had not yet been instituted but were "on the cards".  The court found that there existed a real and not merely a notional danger of injustice should a stay not be granted.  The court granted a stay to all applicants with the exception of the one applicant who was not facing a real possibility of criminal proceedings being instituted against him.

In Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Craigside Co Ltd 7, the court ordered a stay of civil penalty proceedings pending a decision from ASIC as to whether it would bring a criminal prosecution.  The court considered ss 1331 and 1317P and held that these did not prevent a stay where there is a risk of substantial injustice by the continuation of a civil proceeding which outweighs the interest in all proceedings being heard and determined in the ordinary course.  The court was satisfied that prosecution of the defendants in respect of the same subject matter was "on the cards", and if the civil proceedings continued, ASIC might indirectly obtain evidence prejudicial to the defendants in a future criminal prosecution.

A recent judgment of the Federal Court has considered this line of authority and the sections discussed above, although it should be noted that this was not a civil penalty proceeding. 

Citation Resources Ltd v Landau

In Citation Resources Ltd v Landau, Citation claimed damages against a former director, Mr Landau.  Citation sought a declaration that he had breached his director's duties under the Corporations Act and related relief.

Citation alleged that that on or about 1 April 2015, Mr Landau opened a bank account without authority from Citation, into which its money was banked.  Citation further alleged that payments were made out of the account for Mr Landau's benefit or for the benefit of others without authority from Citation.  In particular, Citation contends that the payments were:

  • made to third parties who had no lawful entitlement to be paid the amount, without Citation having any legal authority to make the payments, for which Citation received no consideration and without any authority from Citation; and
  • not in its best interest, not made for a proper purpose, caused detriment to it, gained an advantage for those to whom the payments were made and gained an advantage for Mr Landau as a shareholder of certain related companies.

The court considered two applications.  The first was by Citation for limited discovery of documents relating to the alleged transactions.  The other application was made by Mr Landau for an indefinite stay of the proceedings. 

The applications were made against the backdrop of an ASIC investigation into Mr Landau in relation to possible criminal charges arising from the same underlying facts and allegations in the civil proceedings.  Furthermore, in separate proceedings 8, ASIC had earlier obtained freezing orders in relation to Mr Landau's assets, income and the companies.  In that proceeding, an ASIC officer swore an affidavit stating that Mr Landau was potentially facing criminal action as a result of ASIC's investigation.

Mr Landau opposed giving discovery of the documents on the basis that it might compromise his position in the ASIC investigation.  Mr Landau sought an indefinite stay of the proceedings on the basis that a criminal prosecution was 'on the cards', arguing that there was a real prospect of criminal charges being laid against him arising from the same facts and matters which are the subject of the proceedings. 

The main issue was whether there was a reasonable possibility that Mr Landau would face criminal prosecution.  Mr Landau contended that the matters pleaded against him sought to raise the same topics being investigated by ASIC and could give rise to a criminal prosecution.  In this way he sought to draw parallels with the "on the cards" cases.  He also referred to s 1317N which (as referred to above) provides that civil penalty proceedings for a declaration of a contravention are automatically stayed if criminal proceedings are commenced against a person for substantially the same conduct. 


Justice McKerracher noted that Citation also relied on s 1317N of the Corporations Act to argue that the legislature has clarified that a proceeding will only be stayed on the actual institution of criminal proceedings, and that it is a reasonable inference that until that point is reached, a stay was not appropriate.  

Justice McKerracher noted that the expression "on the cards" had been interpreted by the courts to mean "a reasonable possibility".  However, his Honour said that the "mere potentiality" of a prosecution falls well short of a prosecution being "on the cards".  He noted that in the Craigside and HLP cases, a decision to prosecute had not been made and a brief had not been sent to the relevant prosecuting authority.  On the other hand, the prospect of the criminal prosecution of Mr Landau appeared to be more advanced than in either of those cases. 

Justice McKerracher considered that while any one particular factor alone is not to be taken to be sufficient to constitute formation of an opinion that criminal prosecution is "on the cards", the totality of the following factors supported such a possibility:

  • ASIC having sought and maintained a freezing order;
  • ASIC having applied for travel restraint orders and, in doing so, indicated that Mr Landau was potentially facing criminal charges;
  • ASIC having conducted a detailed investigation into Mr Landau relating to the same subject matter as the civil proceedings and into a number of suspected contraventions constituting criminal offences which were not mere regulatory offences;
  • ASIC having conducted examinations lasting seven hours;
  • The fact that the allegations made in the civil proceedings, as with the investigations by ASIC, are serious allegations; and
  • An ASIC officer having sworn that Mr Landau might potentially be facing criminal charges. 

Justice McKerracher considered that the following further factors were also in favour of Mr Landau's application:

  • His limited financial resources were unlikely to extend, at least on their face, to being able to substantially contribute both to the defence of these proceedings and to resisting the potential criminal proceedings; and
  • In light of his apparently limited financial resources, it was not apparent that Citation would suffer substantial prejudice if civil proceedings were stayed. His Honour was of the view that the civil proceedings could be resurrected if the criminal proceedings do not eventuate.

Having considered all the above factors, Justice McKerracher held that it was premature to conclude that a criminal prosecution in relation to the matters the subject of the pleaded case was "on the cards".  His Honour dismissed each of the applications and determined that as each had taken a similar amount of time there would be no order as to costs. 


This decision provides a further useful and practical discussion of the "on the cards" line of cases.  It does, however, demonstrate that courts may be reluctant to grant a stay of civil proceedings in circumstances where criminal proceedings are only a mere possibility and not "on the cards".

It is understood that the Federal Court proceedings against Mr Landau are continuing.


1. Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 1331.

2. Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 1317M.

3. Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 1317P.  Subject to the qualifications in subsection (2).

4. Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 1317N.  The civil penalty proceedings may be resumed if the person is not convicted of the offence, otherwise the civil penalty proceedings are dismissed.  See subsection (2).

5. (2007) 164 FCR 487.

6. (2008) 252 ALR 566.

7. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Craigside Company Ltd [2013] FCA 201.

8. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Peter Neil Landau & Ors WAD717/2015.

Australian Company Directors Caught Between A Rock And A Hard Place

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.