Australia: Self incrimination, regulators and commissions – do I really have to answer that question?

This is the first in a two-part series covering some of the issues arising from compulsory examinations, and the privileges that may be available to a person being examined.

The main regulators of Australian corporate life – ASIC, the ACCC, the ATO and APRA – have the power to conduct compulsory examinations as part of their investigations. Similar powers are enjoyed by certain investigatory commissions established by statute. During these examinations, examinees are required to answer questions, even if an answer may incriminate them.

Examinees need to understand how the information they provide to regulators and commissions can be used against them or others, and the protections that may be available to them.

A word of warning at the outset – the dangers of agreeing to a voluntary interview

During an investigation, a regulator may ask a person if they would be happy to participate in a voluntary interview (and perhaps provide a signed acknowledgement). This request is often preceded by assertions that 'the game is up', there is a clear case against the person, their employer will 'hang them out to dry', and the easiest way ahead for them is to tell everything in a voluntary interview as they have nothing to gain by resisting.

Many go ahead without getting the benefit of legal advice and without having a lawyer present – to their detriment. If a person agrees to a voluntary interview, it will be conducted in what appears to be a friendly environment – but they will be asked the same questions they would be asked in a compulsory examination.

In our experience, the person being interviewed may admit to the interviewer's assertions and propositions without critically assessing them. Crucially, if the person's answers may tend to incriminate them, they will have none of the protections which may be available to them if questioned under a compulsory process.

Voluntary interviews can also create headaches for employers. It is often in an employer's interest to ensure that their staff know that interview requests should be referred to senior office holders, so that legal representation can be arranged for the staff member if appropriate.

Self incrimination

In 2015, several significant court cases considered the investigation processes used by ASIC and other regulators, such as the ACCC.

These mainly concerned the powers regulators can deploy for compulsory examinations on oath or affirmation, and the use that can be made of the examination transcripts – a matter of significance given that examinees must answer questions, even if the answers or information provided would incriminate them.

The privilege against self-incrimination

Our justice system follows the principle that, generally, no individual is required to take any step, disclose any information, or provide answers to any question which may tend to incriminate them.1 Our trials and hearings are conducted in an accusatorial system of criminal justice – it is for the prosecuting authority to assemble its evidence and argue and make out its case – rather than a system which requires individuals to provide the evidence that will incriminate them. Accordingly, at common law a person has the right to refuse to answer a question if the answer would be likely to incriminate them.

However, this principle bumps up against the statutory powers and obligations given by parliaments to regulators and other investigatory bodies such as the Australian Crime Commission (ACC), the New South Wales Crime Commission (NSW CC), the NSW Independent Commission against Corruption (NSW ICAC) the Victoria Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (Vic IBAC), the Queensland Crime and Misconduct Commission(Qld CMC)2 and the Western Australian Corruption and Crime Commission (WACCC). The proposed Australian Building and Construction Commission may be given similar powers.3 The case is similar with Commonwealth Royal Commissions (CRC). The use of the self incriminating evidence gathered by these bodies in proceedings against the individual is prima facie inconsistent with the privilege and the principle.

These bodies are required to investigate a matter, gather the relevant facts, then decide what if any action they should take. For the regulators, their task is also to prosecute.

The Acts of Parliaments governing these bodies clearly recognise that, although a person may be required to provide an answer in a compulsory examination that may incriminate them, the answer cannot be admitted in evidence in certain proceedings against the person.4

What if my transcript may be provided to a prosecutor?

We deal with this in greater detail in the second article. However, the mere possibility that your self-incriminating answers may later be provided to a prosecutor does not entitle you to refuse to answer the question.

You can decline to answer a question in an ASIC, Vic IBAC or NSW CC examination if you have a 'reasonable excuse',5 However it is not a 'reasonable excuse' for an examinee who has not been charged to decline to answer questions, simply because of a concern that their answers may be disclosed later to investigating or prosecuting police. However, if such a matter is sent to trial, it is prudent to quickly seek orders preventing the prosecution team from having access to that information.6 The High Court in a case dealing with Vic IBAC Act has very recently held that in the investigation process, prior to charges being laid, the 'accusatorial judicial process' has not yet been engaged, and thus the principle that an accused person cannot be required to testify to the commission of the offence charged does not at that stage apply.7 The High Court was asked to extend the principle to an investigatory phase when someone is reasonably suspected to have committed an offence. It declined.

How can self incrimination privilege be preserved?

Where the legislation identified in the table below applies, the examinee must assert the privilege against self-incrimination before answering a question.8 This is a strict requirement – and the failure to assert the privilege at this time will be fatal to any later claim of privilege. However, the failure to assert that privilege prior to answering the question does not mean that the privilege is lost where the examining body is the ACCC, Vic IBAC, WA CCC or a Commonwealth Royal Commission. The acts governing those bodies do not require the examinee to formally assert the privilege.

How can a self-incriminating answer be used?

Although a person's self-incriminating answer cannot be admitted in evidence against them when the privilege has been maintained, information provided in the answer can be used derivatively. In other words, a regulator or investigatory body may use information derived from the person's answer or from enquiries made as a result of the answer.

Penalty privilege

There is also a lesser-known but related common law privilege available to individuals, known as the 'penalty privilege'.9 It applies to civil proceedings where a financial penalty is sought, such as a fine. It is not available to corporations.10

The privilege arises where a particular step in proceedings may have a tendency to expose the person to a penalty – whether the step be pleading a defence, answering interrogatories or giving discovery. It applies where disqualification orders (from management or directorship roles) are sought, as these are also a form of penalty,11 even if a financial penalty is not claimed.12 On some authorities, penalty privilege may also cover certain orders sought by way of declaration and injunctions, if they have a punitive function.13 However, this is unresolved.14

ATO examinations and privilege

The taxation legislation does not explicitly state that the power to issue notices and to conduct examinations overrides an examinee's privilege against self-incrimination.15

However, case law has established that the examination transcript or answers are admissible against an examinee. It likely follows that the ATO's investigative powers are not subject to the penalty privilege, but this is yet to be judicially tested.16

How can an examination transcript be used in a trial or other proceedings?

This table summarises how when a transcript can be admitted as evidence in proceedings against an individual (assuming they have done whatever is required to assert the privilege).

(Click table for larger version)

Although an examination transcript cannot be tendered in evidence against the examinee if they are on trial, it can be used where the examinee's employing corporation is the defendant. Cases against corporations are regularly built upon the answers provided by directors, executives and staff. This will particularly be relevant if ASIC's focus on corporate conduct and culture leads to the legislative changes being suggested ( see this article).

Under the Commonwealth Evidence Act, admissions made in the examination of a corporate officer may be used as evidence against the corporation, if they are characterised as admissions by a person with authority to make admissions.18

Recent case law

Over the past 18 months several cases have considered examinees' claims of privilege, as well as who can access and use examination transcripts – and how. The second instalment of this article will discuss these.


1 The privilege against self-incrimination is not available to corporations, only individuals: see Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 1316A for criminal proceedings; Environment Protection Authority v Caltex Refining Co Pty Ltd (1993) 178 CLR 477; Daniels Corporation International Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2002) 213 CLR 543, [31] (Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, Gummow and Hayne JJ); Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 187; and Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 187.

2 Crime and Corruption Act (Qld)

3 The Australian Building and Construction Commission is proposed under the Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Bill 2013 which is currently before Parliament. Clause 103 will only provide immunity in respect of criminal proceedings, not civil ones.

4 Section 68(3) of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) (ASIC Act) says that the transcript cannot be used in any criminal or penalty proceedings against the individual. On the other hand, s 159 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) only prevents use in criminal proceedings (essentially cartel proceedings); the transcript can be used in civil penalty proceedings.

5 ASIC Act s 63(5), Crime Commission Act 2012 (NSW) s 25, Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission Act 2011 (Vic) s 135

6 CC v New South Wales Crime Commission [2015] NSWSC 1866, [24]–[27] (Adams J).

7 R v Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commissioner [2016] HCA 8 at [40] –[52] 10 March 2016

8 ASIC Act s68(2), SIS Act s290(2), ACC Act s30(4)(c), NSWCC Act s39(3)(b), NSW ICAC Act s 26(2), Qld CMC Act s197,

9 Rich v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2004) 220 CLR 129, [24] (Gleeson CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Callinan and Heydon JJ).

10 Daniels Corporation International Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2002) 213 CLR 543, [2002] HCA 49 at [31]

11 ASIC v Vizard (2005) 145 FCR 57, [35] (Finkelstein J); Gillfillan v ASIC [2012] NSWCA 370, [182] (Sackville AJA).

12 Re Australian Property Custodian Holdings (in liq) (recs and mgrs apptd) (controllers apptd) (No 2) (2012) 93 ACSR 130.

13 See ASIC v Munro [2016] QSC 9 at [29] - which sets out the opposing theories and decisions concerning orders sought under the Corporations Act - ss 1324 (injunction restraining conduct) and 1101B (restraining involvement in certain conduct). One view is that as these orders serve both protective and remedial functions and are imposed having regard to the objects of personal and general deterrence then the proceeding may be considered as one in which a penalty is sought to be imposed.

14 ASIC v Munro [2016] QSC 9 at [29].

15 This position was arrived at by implication from the effect of the penalties for non-compliance contained in ss 8C and 8D of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth): see Commissioner of Taxation v De Vonk (1995) 61 FCR 564, 567 (Foster J), 579–84 (Hill and Lindgren JJ). The High Court was asked in a special leave application in 2012 to revisit this and declined: Binetter v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2013] HCATrans 032 (15 February 2013) – dealing with what was then s 263 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), but which is now found in the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) sch 1 s 253-10ff.

16 Thomas Middleton, 'The privilege against self-incrimination, the penalty privilege and legal professional privilege under the laws governing ASIC, APRA, the ACCC and the ATO – suggested reforms' (2008) 30 Aust Bar Rev 282.

17 Under the Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 (NSW) (ICAC Act), the restriction is on "use" in proceedings against the person, rather than making the answer inadmissible in evidence.

18 ACCC v Leahy Petroleum [2004] FCA 1678, [118]–[124] (Merkel J); Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Fortescue Metals Group Ltd (No 2) (2009) 176 FCR 529, [2] (Gilmour J) – e.g. where ss 81 and 87 of the Commonwealth Evidence Act (or similar) apply and the statements were made by a person who had corporate authority to make those statements.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Most awarded firm and Australian deal of the year
Australasian Legal Business Awards
Employer of Choice for Women
Equal Opportunity for Women
in the Workplace (EOWA)

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.