Australia: Is change ahead? The future of procedural fairness in unfair dismissal claims

Last Updated: 23 February 2016
Article by Richard Ottley


A frequent area of confusion for employers, is the process which should be followed when terminating employment. In particular, many employers when seized with the knowledge that their employee's conduct is incompatible with their continued employment, overlook considerations of natural justice in their haste to terminate the employee.

Complying with procedural fairness and ensuring employees are given a fair and reasonable opportunity to defend themselves before being terminated, has particular relevance under the unfair dismissal laws. These laws direct the Fair Work Commission's attention to such matters when arriving at a view as to whether a termination was harsh, unjust or unreasonable. A failure to observe procedural fairness where required to do so, will often result in an otherwise unimpeachable dismissal being held to be unfair, thereby resulting in the applicant's claim being successful.

This has caused a degree of controversy amongst employers. Calls for reform have been heard by the Productivity Commission which made certain recommendations in this area in its Report into the Workplace Relations Framework (No 76) of 30 November 2015.

This article looks at such recommendations in the context of a recent decision of the Fair Work Commission in December 2015 involving the dismissal of motoring journalist whose employment was terminated following his causing damage to a car he was testing (Daniel DeGasperi –v- Pty Ltd – Decision of Commissioner Cambridge -17 December 2015).

Facts of the case

The applicant was Deputy Editor of Caradvice being a business primarily focused upon the operation of its website. is a website that contains numerous car reviews and other industry news and information. The applicant in his role as Deputy Editor was responsible for testing various motor vehicles loaned to the company for this purpose.

The applicant was involved in a single car accident while testing an Alfa Romeo 4C at 11:45 pm on the old Pacific Highway near Brooklyn. The car had been put in race mode at the time of the accident. The Alfa Romeo 4C was a new model sports car and there were only two of them in Australia at the time of the accident. Whilst the vehicle did not appear to be extensively damaged, it turned out that the cost of repairs were significantly more than first appeared to be the case.

The applicant was sent an email some three days after the accident in which he was requested to attend a meeting with the CEO of the company to talk about how the company should respond to Fiat Chrysler Australia (being the organisation that had loaned the vehicle). The next day the applicant duly attended the CEO's office where he was informed that his employment had been terminated on the basis of misconduct associated with the car accident. He was provided with a pre-prepared termination letter which confirmed his employer's view that his actions constituted serious misconduct warranting summary dismissal. Despite being summarily terminated, his employer provided four weeks' pay in lieu of notice (in addition to statutory entitlements).

The applicant subsequently brought a claim for unfair dismissal asserting that the car accident could not constitute misconduct or serious misconduct because it was not wilful or deliberate behaviour. He asserted that the stability control system of the vehicle was not deactivated when in race mode but merely suspended until the driver pressed the brake. He also asserted that his employer did not have policies or procedures with respect to the deactivation of stability control when reviewing motor vehicles. The applicant complained about alleged deficiencies in procedural fairness including that he was not notified of the reason for dismissal prior to being terminated, he was not provided with sufficient time to formally respond to the allegations and he was deprived of the opportunity to bring a support person to the meeting at which he was dismissed.

The Commission accepted the position advanced by the employer that the applicant's decision to test the Alfa Romeo 4C late at night on a public road and to engage the vehicle's race mode might properly be considered to represent conduct which supported the decision to terminate. In coming to this view the Commission also considered the senior position occupied by the applicant as Deputy Editor. It is uncertain how much account the Commission took of the applicant's assertion that the stability control system of the Alfa Romeo 4C was not deactivated when race mode was engaged but merely suspended until the driver pressed the brake. It is also unclear how the Commission viewed the applicant's assertion concerning the alleged lack of company policies on the topic of deactivation of stability controls.

Having made the above finding, the Commission noted a number of factors touching on procedural fairness which made the termination unfair. Those matters included the first indication that the applicant was given that his employment was in jeopardy was in fact the provision of the letter of termination at the termination meeting on 23 March 2015. The Commission noted that the employer did not provide an opportunity for the applicant to respond to the findings of misconduct that the employer had identified from earlier responses to questions asked of him by the CEO a few days before. In particular the Commission noted that the applicant was "plainly denied an opportunity to advance any explanation, or offer any defence, or provide other factors which may have had some influence on the decision to dismiss".

The Commission also noted that as another example of the erroneous procedure the employer followed, it failed to give the applicant any indication that the meeting to which the applicant was invited was one where disciplinary action might be considered including termination. In fact an email that had invited the applicant to the meeting implied that a discussion was to be held before the applicant conducted a scheduled car comparison test. The Commission noted that given the arrangements made for the meeting, the applicant was in effect denied the opportunity to have a support person to assist him because there was no indication the meeting was of a nature where this would be necessary.

In conclusion, the Commission came to the view that notwithstanding there was a valid reason for the dismissal the applicant was denied procedural fairness having regard to the above factors. This resulted in the particular dismissal being unreasonable and unnecessarily harsh. The applicant's claim for unfair dismissal was therefore established. Orders made included payment of four weeks remuneration.

Whatever view one might take as to the gravity or otherwise of the conduct supporting the termination decision, the simple fact remains that in the Commission's eyes, the claim for unfair dismissal would have failed if the employer had directed its attention to issues around procedural fairness and satisfied these requirements before terminating the applicant.

Productivity Commission Report

This decision is an example of the type of case the Productivity Commission has in mind when making recommendations to reform the test for unfair dismissal in its recommendations. The Productivity Commission's Report noted in its key points that further incremental reform was required in relation to the unfair dismissal regime to:

"prevent spurious cases from resulting in financial settlement, by introducing more effective upfront filters that focus on the merits of claims, and revised fee arrangements for upfront lodgement and for cases proceeding to arbitration;
not favour form over substance, by changing the legislative test for unfair dismissal and the penalty regime to ensure that procedural errors alone are not sufficient to award compensation or restore employment in what would otherwise be regarded as a fair dismissal."

The Productivity Commission in its Report at Recommendation 17.4 went on to state that:

"The Australian Government should change the penalty regime for unfair dismissal cases so that:

  • employees can only receive compensation when they have been dismissed without reasonable evidence of persistent underperformance or serious misconduct;
  • procedural errors by an employer should not result in reinstatement or compensation for a former employee, but can, at the discretion of the Fair Work Commission, lead to either counselling and/or education of the employer, or penalties.In repeated or serious cases, the Fair Work Commission should seek penalties by making an application to the Federal Court or Federal Circuit Court".

If Recommendation 17.4 finds its way into legislation then a failure to observe procedural fairness requirements alone, will not be sufficient to underpin a successful claim for unfair dismissal.The employee in order to succeed, will need to show that they have been dismissed without reasonable evidence of persistent significant underperformance or serious misconduct. Employers however should not rest on their laurels in this context, as a failure to implement and observe procedural fairness would expose them to the risk of financial penalties.


It will be interesting to see what the Government does with the Productivity Commission's Report and whether it will seek to implement what some commentators will regard as a paradigm shift away from the primacy of procedural fairness in the context of the unfair dismissal laws.However the threat of sanctions for failure to provide procedural fairness may be seen as providing a suitable counterweight to the removal of procedural fairness considerations in the Commission's evaluation of unfair dismissal claims.

Perhaps the key message for employers in all of this, is to ensure that they continue to observe procedural fairness in accordance with the unfair dismissal laws as they presently stand, and to remember that if the Productivity Commission's above Recommendation is fully implemented there will be no cause for complacency.

For more information, please contact:

Richard Ottley, Partner
Phone: +61 2 9233 5544

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.