Australia: Bargaining and Industrial Action: Do we really have to sit down with them? And when can we all cool off?

Two recent decisions of Fair Work Commission (FWC) Full Benches highlight a number of features of the framework for collective bargaining and protected industrial action under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act).


In LCR Mining Group Pty Ltd v CFMEU [2016] FWCFB 400 (4 February 2016), the Full Bench considered an appeal by the company against a decision and bargaining orders made by Commissioner Saunders.1

The parties had met in person a number of times to progress negotiations for an enterprise agreement, but then could not agree on where and how future meetings should occur. The company wanted to conduct future meetings by teleconference or videoconference, while the union wanted to continue to meet face-to-face at the Newcastle airport.

Commissioner Saunders granted the union's application for bargaining orders, finding that the requirement in section 228(1)(a) of the FW Act to attend and participate in meetings at reasonable times: "requires the participants in the meeting to be present in person".2

On appeal, the Full Bench (Catanzariti VP, Sams DP and Roberts C) took a different view, largely on the basis that in the modern context meetings often occur other than in person:

In the digital age of an ever-advancing civilisation, technology has and will continue to evolve at a rapid pace. The rise of information systems and the development of collaborative technologies have brought manifold efficiencies including an abundance of new methods by which distance is overcome and 'meetings of the mind' may be facilitated.3

According to the Full Bench, a "meeting of the minds" (as opposed to a "meeting of the bodies") could occur "regardless of the specific technologies utilised in facilitating such a meeting".4

Further, "a narrow and restrictive interpretation" of section 228(1)(a) – disallowing the option of meetings by phone or video – would introduce words into the provision (a requirement to meet face-to-face) which are not there.5

The Full Bench rejected the union's argument that the broader meaning of the word "attend" (meetings) in section 228(1)(a) "would open floodgates to persons insisting on teleconference or videoconference being the modus operandi for bargaining meetings". The Full Bench noted that "these facilities have been in use for years in the bargaining process alongside face to face meetings" – but added the caution that this "is not to say that every telephone conversation or videoconference will constitute a meeting" for the purposes of the provision.6

The decision therefore permits employers to insist that bargaining negotiations are conducted in the manner that is most efficient for the business. Particularly for larger employers with operations in a number of states, it would be legitimate to hold meetings by phone or video. But employers should also:

  • consider whether such meetings could reasonably be supplemented with some face-to-face meetings; and
  • remember that section 228(1) does actually entail an obligation to meet (through whatever method), rather than simply responding to a union's claims or counter-proposals through written correspondence.7


MUA v Patrick Stevedores Holdings Pty Ltd [2016] FWCFB 711 (8 February 2016) dealt with an appeal against a decision by Vice President Watson to grant the company's application to suspend the union's industrial action under section 425 of the FW Act.8

The parties have been negotiating since March 2015 over a new agreement for Patrick's port operations at Brisbane, Port Botany, Melbourne and Fremantle. While some progress had been made, including through the assistance of Deputy President Booth of the FWC, in late 2015 the union obtained secret ballot authorisation for various forms of protected industrial action.

Bans, stoppages and other forms of action commenced on 6 January 2016, and continued on the 18th and 19th with further action proposed for 25-27 January. In the meantime Patrick applied to the FWC for a section 425 order suspending the union's industrial action for a 60-day period.

Section 425(1) provides that the FWC must make an order suspending protected action that is being engaged in, if the Commission is satisfied that a suspension is appropriate taking into account:

  • (a) whether the suspension would be beneficial to the bargaining representatives because it would assist them to resolve matters at issue in the negotiations;
  • (b) the duration of the industrial action;
  • (c) whether suspension would be contrary to the public interest or inconsistent with the objects of the FW Act;
  • (d) any other relevant matter.

Watson VP considered that the industrial action taken by the MUA "reflects a deterioration in the negotiation process"; and that a suspension of protected action would assist the parties, provided it enabled "proper discussion and consideration of revised positions and for the parties to access the assistance of Deputy President Booth".9 Watson VP made an order suspending protected industrial action for 35 days.

However, the Full Bench (Hatcher VP, Catanzariti VP and Bull DP) upheld the union's appeal, finding that Watson VP's decision involved an error of fact "as to whether suspension would be beneficial to the bargaining representatives" within the meaning of section 425(1)(a).10

The Full Bench considered that the Vice President had reached an incorrect factual conclusion that the elevation of hostilities between the parties had precluded discussion and negotiation.11 The Full Bench's reasons for reaching this view included that:12

  • Patrick had not (as Watson VP found) cancelled negotiation meetings in mid-January, but had simply proposed that they be rescheduled to ensure Booth DP could be involved.
  • Rather than an elevation of hostilities, high-level discussions between the parties had continued (including at a meeting on 22 January).
  • The parties had agreed on a process to allow discussions to continue to occur over the MUA's proposed settlement document, even though industrial action was continuing.
  • Relevant managers were not precluded from attending bargaining meetings once industrial action was taking place.

The Full Bench upheld the union's appeal, and decided to re-hear and determine the company's section 425 application itself. In the meantime, it appears that something of a cooling-off has in fact transpired following the orders of Watson VP - although the union and workers are free to continue taking protected action, the parties have resumed talks before Booth DP.13

It should also be noted that although it found in the union's favour on the appeal, the Full Bench rejected the MUA's argument that the suspension order made by Watson VP was invalid because it did not identify the particular industrial action being engaged in, and which was the subject of suspension.14

In reaching that view, the Full Bench found that a suspension order under section 425 is not limited to the protected action being engaged in at the time the order is made. Read in conjunction with section 413(7), a section 425 order has the effect of suspending all industrial action on the part of the relevant union/employees.15 As the Full Bench put it:

If a suspension order was confined in its effect to a particular type of protected industrial action taken at a particular time, that would imply that other types of protected industrial action could be taken during the cooling off period established by the order. That would appear likely to frustrate the objective of the provision ...16

Overall, the Full Bench's decision highlights that clear evidence will need to be provided in support of an employer's application for a "cooling off" period under section 425 of the FW Act. It sets a high bar for the evidence that will be required to substantiate the employer's argument that a suspension of protected action will assist the parties to reach an agreement.


1 CFMEU v LCR Mining Group Pty Ltd; IRIQ Pty Ltd [2015] FWC 7970.

2 Ibid at [40].

3 [2016] FWCFB 400 at [46].

4 Ibid at [48].

5 And this would offend well-established principles of statutory interpretation, including those enunciated by Justice Flick of the Federal Court in JJ Richards and Sons v Fair Work Australia [2012] FCAFC 53 at [49]-[53]. See [2016] FWCFB 400 at [40]-[42].

6 [2016] FWCFB 400 at [49].

7 See APESMA v Peabody Energy Australia Coal P/L [2015] FWCFB 1451, discussed in further detail here.

8Patrick Stevedores Holdings Pty Ltd [2016] FWC 464; see also Watson VP's reasons for decision in [2016] FWC 510.

9 [2016] FWC 510 at [25], [31].

10 [2016] FWCFB 711 at [39].

11 Ibid at [40].

12 Ibid at [41]-[51].

13 See [2016] FWC 986 (Statement by Booth DP, 12 February 2016).

14 [2016] FWCFB 711 at [26].

15 Ibid at [27]-[29]; see also [37].

16 Ibid at [30].

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Most awarded firm and Australian deal of the year
Australasian Legal Business Awards
Employer of Choice for Women
Equal Opportunity for Women
in the Workplace (EOWA)

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.