Australia: Development Regulation At The Cross Roads: Where To From Here?

Last Updated: 16 March 2007
Article by David Nicholls


If you asked developers to answer the following questions in respect of the effects of the IPA:

  • does it take longer to have a project approved?
  • is the process for gaining development approval more costly?
  • is property development a more risky process?
  • is development now being undertaken in a more environmentally sustainable way?

the answer would be a resounding "yes".

Yet there is a strong perception within some sectors, that development is antithetical to environmental protection. When the IPA was introduced conservationists criticised the Act’s objective of achieving a "balance" between economic, social and environment considerations. Instead they argued for an "environmental bottom line" with no "trade offs". These diametrically opposed positions remain central to the debate about how to further reform Queensland’s planning legislation.

South East Queensland has become a microcosmic representation of what the future holds for the whole State with the introduction of regional planning having prohibitory effect without compensation for down zoning. The SEQ Regional Plan and the Vegetation Management Act are having a profound effect on property rights. Vast areas of South East Queensland have been placed off limits to development, while within the urban footprint, development remains highly contestable. IPA is being reviewed against that background.


On 30 March 2007 the Integrated Planning Act 1997 will have been in force for 9 years. Despite this the Integrated Development Assessment Systems ("IDAS") has not yet incorporated all development approval processes; the Act’s infrastructure charging regime has not yet become operative and assessment managers remain unable or unwilling to meet the IPA’s mandatory processing timeframes.

Where IPA compliant planning schemes have been adopted they have proven to be very complex documents. This seems to have been the product of local governments attempting to achieve absolute certainty through codes, driven by fear of the Acts "prohibition on prohibitions" and dislike of "performance based planning".

The IDAS system has also proven to be procedurally complex which has led to many processing errors. Fortunately the Planning and Environment Court has been prepared to excuse many of these errors. Nevertheless the development assessment system has come under significantly increased stress through the weight of its own complexity.

All of this has had a profound effect upon the efficiency of the system as applicants have struggled to gain development approvals in a timely and cost effective manner. Overlaid upon this has been exponential growth in development contributions for infrastructure consequent upon transitional loosening of the controls on infrastructure charging. IPA was supposed to introduce a transparent, accountable and equitable system of charging for infrastructure through Priority Infrastructure Plans and Infrastructure Charging Schedules yet to date local governments continue to operate under a more liberalised regime of transitional Planning Scheme Policies.

Government’s Response

The former Minister for Local Government, Planning, Sport and Women the Honourable Desley Boyle MP launched a full scale review of the IDAS system in February this year. A summit of all stakeholders was held in March which was followed up with direct consultation with individual key stakeholders. The Institute participated in this process. Ms Boyle released a discussion paper "Dynamic Planning for a Growing State" in August this year which contained 87 specific proposals for "improvements" to the legislative framework together with a "market survey" asking participants to rate each of the proposals on a scale from 1 to 5. Submissions in respect of the discussion paper closed on 3 November 2006.

Industry View

The Institute’s perception of the proposed "improvements", was that if implemented some of the "improvements" would further erode the fundamental principles upon which the IPA was based. In particular the industry viewed with grave concern:

  • Reintroduction of a mandatory front end EIS process in order for applications to be "properly made";
  • Reintroduction of prohibition on development;
  • Making certain code assessable development applications public notifiable and appealable by third parties.

Equally, the absence of any proposals to deal with the failure of local governments to meet IPA timeframes in assessing development applications, and the inequitable burden of infrastructure costs was very concerning. In many respects the discussion paper was very short on detail.

Although the discussion paper contains some worthy initiatives which the Institute has supported there is, overall, an absence of rigorous analysis. Instead the discussion paper seems to attempt to give something to all stakeholders who attended the summit. It has been disappointing that the Department has approached the task of reviewing the legislation in this way rather than by establishing an expert task force to undertake a rigorous and professional analysis of the operation and impacts of the legislation.

Institute’s submission

The Institute’s submission, forwarded to the Minister on 3 November comprises a detailed 8 page overview together with a 55 page spreadsheet analysing each of the specific "improvements" against performance criteria identified by the Institute. The key criteria are integration, efficiency, equity, transparency, accountability, high quality planning outcomes and creating a proper "balance" between environmental, social and economic considerations. Following is a short synopsis of the main points in the submission.


The State government should complete the IDAS "roll in" process without further delay. The Institute supports codification of referral jurisdiction for all agencies within the IDAS framework as a means of achieving clarity and certainty regarding these important procedural matters. There is a lack of consistency in the degree of certainty and transparency in the standards applied by State agencies to State interests. The identification of what constitutes a "State interest" is critical and State interests must be consistently reflected across planning schemes. The Institute does not support certain State codes sitting outside of planning schemes.


There should be increased delegation of decision making to professionally qualified officers or independent consultants in accordance with Development Assessment Forum ("DAF") leading practice 8. The State government should assume responsibility for ensuring that IDAS timeframes are adhered to by assessment managers. Imposition of mandatory information, in particular EIS documents as a pre-requisite to a properly made application is strongly opposed. However all efforts to standardise State and local planning instruments are strongly encouraged.


The State government and local governments should make a greater effort to engage with community stakeholders at the plan making stage. Planning schemes should set the parameters for code assessable development and such applications should not be subject to third party submissions and appeals. The expansion of prohibition of development at State and regional levels and reintroduction of prohibition at a local level is strongly opposed.

Transparency The proposal to expand ministerial powers to further intervene in development assessment and decision making is opposed. The Institute is particularly concerned at the increased potential for State intervention to be arbitrary and for development decisions to be based on political or ideological lobbying rather than town planning principles. However, the Institute strongly supports all measures which would maximise the opportunity for appropriate delegation of assessment and decisions and strongly endorses leading practice 8 of the DAF Report "Leading Practice Model for Development Assessment".


The Institute reiterated its view that infrastructure charging is one of the most profound issues with respect to housing affordability in Queensland and is critical of the government’s lack of progress and failure to engage with that issue in the discussion paper. The continuing current transitional arrangements which lack accountability and transparency are unacceptable. In terms of dispute resolution the Institute would support procedural disputes being resolved by a Registrar of the Planning & Environment Court rather than splitting the jurisdiction between the Court and a Tribunal. Increased use of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms is strongly supported.

High quality planning outcomes

The Institute supports a return to the higher order, or bigger picture, assessment of impact assessable development applications focusing on the strategic elements of planning schemes. Conflict with strategic elements without sufficient grounds to justify the conflict should ground refusal of applications rather than the current arrangements whereby conflict with any provision of a scheme can justify refusal.


The IPA aims to achieve ecological sustainability which is a balance between protection of ecological processes, economic development and maintenance of cultural, economic, physical and social wellbeing of communities. Certain State agencies have prioritised the ecological side of the equation such that there is now an imbalance. This is especially so in South East Queensland. The development industry’s contribution to ecological enhancement and sustainable solutions must be recognised. The Government should reinstate this balance.


The IPA’s attempt at microeconomic reform which was intended to simplify the development assessment process and make it more efficient has failed. The costs associated with this failure are ultimately reflected in the price of development products which in turn impacts on housing affordability. This needs to be addressed urgently and the submission calls for a more thorough and professional evaluation of the regulatory system with a view to achieving one of the Act’s original key objectives – an efficient planning system.

The detailed submission can be viewed on the Institute’s website at

© Hopgood Ganim

Australia's Best Value Professional Services Firm - 2005 and 2006 BRW-St.George Client Choice Awards

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

David Nicholls
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.