With the Small Business and Unfair Contract Terms Act
2015 (Cth) (Act) having received royal assent
on 12 November 2015, the unfair contract terms protection that has
been afforded to consumers since 2010 will soon be extended to
Now is the time to review the standard form business-to-business
(B2B) contracts you use in your dealings with
small businesses to ensure they are not at risk of being considered
'unfair' when the new rules come into effect.
What changes are introduced by the Act?
The Act amends two pieces of legislation which have provided
consumers with protection against unfair contract terms for some
time, being the:
Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act
(ASIC Act) for contracts relating to financial
services or products (such as loan agreements, leases,
hire-purchase agreements, debt factoring agreements)
Australian Consumer Law for other contracts.
The Act extends the unfair contract terms protection in these
Acts to standard form contracts that meet the following
at the time the contract is made, one (or more) of the parties
to the contract is a business that employs fewer than 20 people
(counting full time employees, part time employees and casual
employees who work on a regular and systematic basis), and
the upfront price payable under the contract does not
$300,000 for contracts lasting up to one year
$1,000,000 for contracts lasting more than one year.
There are three key questions to consider in determining whether
a standard contract term might be considered unfair under the
What is a 'standard form contract'?
This term is not defined in the Act.
A court will make its own assessment about what constitutes a
standard form contract. The factors that a court will take into
the bargaining power of the parties
whether the contract was pre-prepared or pro-forma
whether the contract was a 'take it or leave it"
whether the contract took into account specific characteristics
of the parties or the transaction.
What is the 'upfront price' of a contract?
The 'upfront price' of a contract is the consideration
payable for the product or service supplied, and disclosed at or
before the contract is entered into.
If credit is provided under the contract, the upfront price
should be calculated by including the principal amount and
disregarding the interest.
What is an 'unfair' term?
There are no prescribed or defined unfair terms. However, types
of terms which may be affected include:
unilateral variation terms
terms which require an amount to be repayable on demand
cross default provisions
terms relating to the seizure of goods.
When will the changes take effect?
The Act will come into effect 12 months after assent (that is,
12 November 2016).
The Act will not apply to contracts that were entered into
before this date. However:
if a contract is renewed after the Act commences, the Act will
apply to the renewed contract
if a contractual term is varied after the Act commences, the
Act applies to the term as varied.
What will happen if a contract contains an unfair term?
If a contractual term is deemed to be unfair, it will be void
and therefore unenforceable.
However, the contract will continue to bind the parties if it
can operate without the unfair term(s).
What should you do to prepare for the changes?
Although 12 months may seem like a long time to prepare for the
changes, you may find that some (or many) of your contracts will
need to be amended and it is best to assess your position sooner
rather than later. We recommend taking the following steps now:
Review your customer base and categories of customers to get an
understanding of how frequently you enter into agreements with
businesses that employ fewer than 20 people
Review your standard form B2B contracts (whether these are
contracts with suppliers, customers or independent contractors)
which might be used in transactions involving businesses that
employ fewer than 20 persons, to determine whether they contain
terms that could be considered unfair
When reviewing your standard form B2B contracts you should also
consider agreements that are already on foot but may be renewed or
varied at a later date.
Consider whether and how your standard form contracts might
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The court exercised its discretion when a financier's failure to register security interests properly was inadvertent.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).