Australia: Australian WHS Laws - First Judicial Guidance On Who Is An ‘Officer'

Last Updated: 12 August 2015
Article by Nicholas Beech, Jenni Priestley, Jacinta Long and Maurice Thompson

As foreshadowed in our previous update (available here) a recent Australian Capital Territory Magistrates' Court decision provides the first judicial guidance on the criteria for meeting the definition of 'officer' for the purposes of the due diligence duty under Australian Work Health and Safety (WHS) laws. In this update we examine the details of the case and explore some of the learned Magistrate's observations in relation to this key new area of Australian WHS laws.


In our earlier Update we referred to a decision in June this year of the ACT Industrial Court which involved a prosecution against an alleged officer of a Person Conducting a Business of Undertaking (PCBU) for failing to exercise due diligence, contrary to the duty set out in section 27 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (WHS Act)

Chief Industrial Magistrate Lorraine Walker has now published her reasons for dismissing the charge against Mr Al-Hasani. 

The decision provides some useful guidance as to the factors that are likely to be relevant in assessing whether, for the purposes of the definition of an 'officer' under section 9(b)(i) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), a person is someone who makes, or participates in making, decisions that affect the whole, or a substantial part, of the business of the corporation. 

The key facts 

Relevantly, the facts were as follows:

  • Kenoss Contractors Pty Ltd (Kenoss Contractors) used two compounds while performing road works (the Project); a main site and a second smaller site which was solely used to store materials (Site);
  • On 23 March 2012, Michael Booth a driver employed by a contractor engaged by Kenoss Contractors to deliver materials for the Project, was fatally electrocuted when the bucket of his truck came close to or contacted overhead power lines at the Site;
  • Kenoss Contractors' corporate structure was not fully described but appears to have comprised a number of senior roles, including a director, general manager and safety officer.  Mr Al-Hasani was described as 'Project Manager' and was responsible for managing all major projects for Kenoss Contractors;
  • The organisational chart for the Project noted Mr Al-Hasani at the head with the safety officer below him.  A project engineer, surveyor and general foreman also appeared as direct reports to Mr Al-Hasani;
  • Mr Al-Hasani said he reported to the general manager and company director and that, in terms of his scope of decision making power:
    • the general manager was "El supremo";
    • there were other people in the accounting and administration departments between him and the general manager and company director;
    • he could not unilaterally direct payments to be made to any party or employ people or purchase basic consumables;
    • he prepared tenders but proposed prices had to be approved by 'management';
    • he performed traditional Project Manager responsibilities and decision making including:
      • sometimes making decisions as the Project Manager and sometimes participating in making decisions with the general manager and company director;
      • participating in management meetings;
      • maintaining computer systems;
      • liaising with customers;
      • implementing procedures, plans and safe work method statements;
      • managing and supervising performance of project teams;
      • keeping the general manager advised of developments;
      • managing customer supplied items and materials,
      • managing variations in contract price;
      • verifying conformance with documented processes in project plans and taking necessary remedial actions; and
      • reviewing and approving project documents and signing off on completion of projects.

The decision

The learned Magistrate concluded that notwithstanding Mr Al-Hasani's role as Project Manager, the prosecution had not proven that he did, in fact, make decisions or participate in decisions that affected either the whole or a substantial part of Kenoss Contractors' business. 

In reaching this conclusion, the learned Magistrate:

  • said the limited evidence established that Kenoss Contractors had a relatively flat management structure and Mr Al-Hasani sat close to the top of the structure; 
  • observed that there was no specific evidence, however, from either the general manager or company director as to the scope of their own roles or where Mr Al-Hasani sat and his level of influence within Kenoss Contractors;
  • noted that there were clear limits on Mr Al-Hasani's participation in decision making delineated by his role as Project Manager;
  • stated that Mr Al-Hasani's acceptance that he did make decisions and participate in decisions that affected either the whole or a substantial part of Kenoss Contractors' business was not conclusive of the issue of whether he was an officer;
  • noted the absence of any decisions on the definition of officer under the work health and safety laws and relied on observations made by the High Court in Shafron v Australian Securities and Investment Commission  [2012] HCA 18 at [23] to [26], including the following:

    First, the inquiry required by this paragraph of the definition [sub-section 9(b)(i) Corporations Act] must be directed to what role the person in question plays in the organisation.  It is not an enquiry that is confined to the role that person played in relation to the particular issue in respect of which it is alleged that there was a breach of duty"

    "the notion of participation in making decisions presents a question of fact and degree in which the significance to be given to the role played by the person in question must be assessed"
  • decided that all that had been established was that Mr Al-Hasani's participation in the business was operational and whether it went beyond that to being organisational was only speculative.

What can we learn from the decision?

Drawing from the learned Magistrate's reasons, some of the potentially relevant factors that will come into play when deciding whether a person makes decisions or participates in decisions that affect either the whole or a substantial part of a PCBU's business can be summarised as follows:


Suggests greater ability to make or participate in decisions

Suggests lesser ability to make or participate in decisions

Overall role played in PCBU

Role is across all or many aspects or business divisions within PCBU

Role is limited to certain business divisions

Hiring employees or contractors

Power to hire employees

Able to identify potential employees but no power to hire employees

PCBU funds

Power to commit PCBU funds

Not permitted to commit funds

Business development

Power to direct the type or specific contracts pursued by the PCBU and approve tenders

Responsible for preparing tenders but not permitted to approve tenders or direct type of work pursued

PCBU policies, procedures etc.

Involved in preparing corporate level policies

Involved in preparing, implementing and monitoring compliance with project specific procedures, plans and method statements

Board meetings

Attends board meetings

Attends only management meetings

PCBU corporate legal obligations

Responsible for lodging ASIC returns and quality assurance compliance

Not involved

Management of operations

Manages overall operations with day to day responsibility delegated to project manager

Liaises with customers and manages customer supplied items and materials, manages variations in contract pricing, supervises project teams and signs off on project completion


Many of the learned Magistrate's observations are instructive. However, we offer some food for thought.

Interpretation and the Shafron decision

Heavy reliance was made on observations of the High Court on the proper interpretation of the section 9(b)(i) limb of the definition of 'officer'. These observations were made in the corporations context with reference to the particular circumstances that arose and submissions that were made in Shafron

Here, the circumstances were quite different and attention was not directly turned to the potential impact of the work health and safety context in which the definition appears including the objects of the WHS Act (which are quite different to those of the Corporations Act), the overall context of the WHS Act and any relevant non-legislative materials, in accordance with ACT's Legislation Act 2001.

How these matters are addressed next time will be interesting to see.

The participation and affect requirements

Mr Al-Hasani was not an officer because he did not participate in decisions that affected the whole or a substantial part of the business of Kenoss Contractors.  He made or participated in decisions that affected certain operational aspects of the projects operated by the business.  In this sense it is the overall impact or importance of the decision that is assessed: a decision that affects the whole business may be described as a critical decision that impacts all aspects of the business, whereas a decision that affects a substantial part of the business may be seen as an important decision that impacts on many aspects of the business.  The decisions that Mr Al-Hasani could make or participate in did not have these qualitative characteristics.

It seems that the phrase "a substantial part of the business" may also be applied in a more physical sense such that a decision that affects a separate division of a business may be a relevant decision if that division is a substantial part of the overall business of the PCBU. 

According to the Interpretive Guideline – Model Work Health and Safety Act – The Health and Safety Duty of an Officer under Section 27 issued by Safe Work Australia, a business may have various, defined divisions based on product or service categories and each of the divisions may be a substantial part of the business depending on their role within the organisation as a whole.  The Guideline states that some or all of the following criteria are relevant in identifying whether a part of a business is a substantial part:

  1. The degree to which the part contributes to the revenue of financial standing of the business
  2. The degree to which the part is significant to the reputation of the entity
  3. Whether the part is considered to be a core part of the business, or ancillary to the core business.
  4. The proportion of personnel of the whole business who are engaged in activities within the part.
  5. Whether those who manage that part of the business make significant strategic or policy decisions, or whether those decisions are made at a higher level.

It appears both qualitative and quantitative characteristics will be able to be considered when determining what is a substantial part of a business.

Next steps

The first chapter of the judicial interpretation of an officer's due diligence duty under Australian work health and safety laws has been written.  We now have some guidance on the factors to consider in determining whether a person is an officer of a PCBU. 

However, some big questions remain and more guidance is needed.  Stay tuned for the next chapter – we will let you know when it is written.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions