Australia: The government model litigant policy - ethical issues

Recent hearings of the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse have brought the model litigant obligations to the fore for many government agencies. The Royal Commission is investigating whether current government policies go far enough to ensure litigation involving child sexual abuse claims are dealt with appropriately.1 The investigation is a timely reminder of the duties of government organisations to act as a model litigant and will no doubt highlight some of the ethical issues facing lawyers for those organisations.

The origins of government as the model litigant

The concept of the government acting as the model litigant is not ideological. It has firm common law roots and can be traced back as far as 1912 to Griffiths CJ in Melbourne Steamship Co Ltd v Moorehead where his Honour described it as the "old-fashioned tradition, and almost instinctive, standard of fair play to be observed by the Crown in dealing with subjects".2 The rationale behind this is simple. There is an expectation that a government (and its emanations) will deal honestly and fairly with its citizens and discharge its powers for the public good. Government has no legitimate private interest in performing its functions and is, more often than not, larger and better resourced than private litigants.3 Hence, the courts expect the government and its agencies to act as a "moral exemplar"4 throughout the litigation process.5

In an effort to codify and confirm their commitment to their model litigant obligations, the Commonwealth Government and some state and territory governments have adopted written policies. The Commonwealth,6 Victoria,7 Queensland,8 New South Wales9 and the Australian Capital Territory10 all follow similar policies, while Western Australia, Tasmania and South Australia are subject to the principles of the common law.

Who do the model litigant obligations apply to?

The Commonwealth's policy is the most prescriptive of the written policies that have been adopted. This policy is set out at Appendix B to the Legal Services Directions 2005, made under s 55ZF of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth). The model litigant obligations are binding on all government agencies,11 including all Commonwealth corporate entities and Commonwealth companies that are subject to the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 (Cth)12 and that handle claims or conduct litigation in the name of, or on behalf of, the Commonwealth.13 Typically, the states' and territories' policies are expressed to apply to their departments and agencies. The obligations also apply to private-sector lawyers appearing on behalf of the Crown. The written policies provide that the obligations apply before courts, tribunals, inquiries, in arbitration and other alternative dispute resolution processes. It is important for all inhouse lawyers to be aware of whether they are bound by their respective government's model litigant policies and/or the common law principles so that they adhere to the particular requirements.

How does the model litigant conduct itself?

The content of the obligation at common law has not always been clear, but the written policies seek to provide clarity and guidance on what conduct is required of a model litigant. Behind each of the duties is an overarching duty to act honestly, fairly, with complete propriety and in accordance with the highest professional standards. It goes beyond the requirement for lawyers to act in accordance with their ethical obligations and merely acting honestly or in accordance with the law and court rules. The policies all variously refer to the following specific duties, some of which have long been recognised by the courts:

  • dealing with claims promptly;
  • minimising delay in proceedings;
  • making an early assessment of the prospects of success and potential liability in claims;
  • paying legitimate claims without litigation;
  • acting consistently in the handling of claims and litigation;
  • endeavouring to avoid, prevent or limit the scope of litigation and participating in alternative dispute resolution where appropriate;
  • minimising costs in proceedings;
  • not taking advantage of a claimant who lacks the resources to litigate a legitimate claim;
  • not taking technical points unless the agencies interests would be compromised;
  • not undertaking and pursuing appeals unless there are reasonable prospects for success or the appeal is otherwise justified in the public interest; and
  • apologising when the government or its lawyers have acted wrongfully or improperly.

However, the model litigant obligations do not oblige the Crown to "fight with one hand behind its back in proceedings".14 The Crown is not prevented from acting firmly and properly to protect its own interests and "has the same right as any other litigant notwithstanding it assumes for itself, quite properly, the role of a model litigant".15


The agencies themselves are responsible for enforcing the model litigant policy. Agency heads are required to monitor and report on their agency's compliance with the obligations. Again, the Commonwealth's policy is the most prescriptive in this area. The Legal Services Directions 2005 are not enforceable by an applicant16 and the issue of non-compliance with those Directions may not be raised in any proceeding except by, or on behalf of, the Commonwealth.17 The Attorney-General has the ultimate responsibility for non-compliance with the obligations and can impose sanctions, or for extreme or repeated breaches, can issue a specific direction under s 55ZF of the Judiciary Act regarding the use of particular advisers or requiring the agency to change its legal advisers.

Ultimately, however, the obligation is an ethical requirement rather than a legal standard in litigation.18 None of the policies give legislative power to the courts to enforce them. Rather, the courts hold government legal officers accountable through judicial criticism and the expectation of assistance in the administration of justice by the Crown. There has also been conflicting authority for the proposition that the courts can take conduct falling short of the standard of a model litigant into account when determining questions of costs.19 In any event, it is prudent for inhouse counsel to consider the potential impact of such conduct on costs when advising government agencies.

Ethical issues and practical considerations

The conduct of some state agencies in dealing with child sexual abuse claims in civil litigation has been the subject of recent and ongoing scrutiny by the Royal Commission. What the Royal Commission has questioned, and sought further submissions on, is whether the model litigant obligations go far enough to ensure claims of this nature are appropriately dealt with. A number of the ethical issues have been highlighted by the Royal Commission, including:

  • Has the agency shown sensitivity in the collection of evidence in claims of this nature?
  • Has the agency been mindful of the traumatic experience litigation of this nature can be for applicants through ensuring litigation is not unnecessarily drawn out and that the conduct during the litigation is not disproportionate to the objectives of the applicant?
  • Has the agency acted consistently in the handling of all claims?

The fact that these issues continue to face scrutiny emphasises the necessity of those advising or instructing on behalf of government agencies to ensure they are continually complying with their model litigant obligations.


It is important that all inhouse lawyers in government departments or agencies remain aware of the extent of the model litigant obligations as ethical issues will frequently arise. Active consideration of the obligations will prevent breaches occurring.

In particular, lawyers should consider the following practical issues:

  • Minimising costs and delay is paramount. A court will not look favourably on a government agency that, for example, fails to narrow the issues in dispute, raises purely technical defences or forces an applicant to prove a fact that it knows to be true. Consider the use of agreed statements of facts where appropriate to allow a court or tribunal to deal only with the legal issues in dispute. Moreover, the early exchange of evidence such as expert reports will assist in determining the relevant issues.
  • Compliance with court rules or procedures is expected of government bodies regardless of competing demands or resourcing. It has been held that the lack of resources available to a government agency is not an answer to a delay in compliance with a court timetable.20
  • As the obligation requires complete propriety and honesty with the court or tribunal, the model litigant should avoid traditional litigation "strategies" or "tactics". Importantly, if opposing lawyers fail to raise a critical issue, it is incumbent on the model litigant to raise such an issue, even if it is adverse to its case.21 Likewise, a court or tribunal's oversight in the exercise of its powers should be brought to its attention as soon as possible, even if this would be adverse to the interests of the government agency.22
  • Special regard should also be had to claims which involve an unrepresented litigant. The model litigant's duty to assist a court or tribunal in the administration of justice in an effort to correct power imbalances is even more pertinent where a claimant is self-represented. Lawyers for the Crown should be respectful, supportive and informative so as to avoid or mitigate a self-represented party's confusion or anxiety. However, it is of course important to maintain boundaries and make it clear to the self-represented party the extent to which a government lawyer can help or advise them.
  • Any action taken in contemplation of a claim or litigation should be considered in light of the model litigant obligations. For example, the destruction of documents that could prejudice a future claimant or the nature of the initial contact with the claimant can have wide-ranging future consequences.
  • Regard to the subject matter of the claim should always be had. It is not always appropriate to rely on statutory limitations or request further particulars in matters of a highly sensitive nature.23


1See Chapter 10.5 Model litigant approaches in Consultation Paper on Redress and Civil Litigation, Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse,
2Melbourne Steamship Co Ltd v Moorehead (1912) 15 CLR 333; 18 ALR 533; [1912] HCA 69; BC1200025 at [342].
3LVR (WA) Pty Ltd v Administrative Appeals Tribunal (2012) 203 FCR 166; 128 ALD 489; [2012] FCAFC 90; BC201204504 at [42].
4ASIC v Hellicar (2012) 247 CLR 345; 286 ALR 501; [2012] HCA 17; BC201202609 at [239] per Heydon J; LVR (WA) Pty Ltd v Administrative Appeals Tribunal (2012) 203 FCR 166; 128 ALD 489; [2012] FCAFC 90; BC201204504 at [42].
5Kenny v South Australia (1987) 46 SASR 268; Yong Jun Qin v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 75 FCR 155; 144 ALR 695; BC9702362.
6Legal Services Directions 2005, October 2012, Appendix B: "The Commonwealth's obligation to act as a model litigant",
7Department of Justice and Regulation (Vic), Model Litigant Guidelines: Guidelines on the State of Victoria's Obligation to Act as a Model Litigant, March 2011,
8Department of Justice and Attorney General (Qld), Model Litigant Principles, October 2010,
9Model Litigant Policy for Civil Litigation, July 2008,
10Law Officer (Model Litigant) Guidelines 2010 (No 1), March 2010,
11The Legal Services Directions 2005 refers to agencies subject to the Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997 (Cth) which has now been superseded by the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 (Cth).
12The Legal Services Directions 2005 refers to companies subject to the Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Act 1997 (Cth) which has now been superseded by the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 (Cth).
13See para 12 of the Legal Services Directions 2005 (Cth).
14Brandon v Commonwealth [2005] FCA 109; BC200500350 at [11] per Whitlam J.
15Above, n 14.
16Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) (Judiciary Act) s 55ZG(2).
17Judiciary Act s 55ZG(3); Caporale v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2013) 212 FCR 220; 302 ALR 246; [2013] FCA 427; BC201302317.
18Justice Tony Pagone, "Speech -- The Model Litigant and Law Clarification" (VSC) [2008] VicJSchol 17.
19See cases discussed in Christopher Peadon, 'What cost to the Crown a Failure to Act as a Model Litigant' (2010) 33 Australian Bar Review 239.
20Kenny v South Australia (1987) 46 SASR 268 at 273.
21LVR (WA) Pty Ltd v Administrative Appeals Tribunal (2012) 203 FCR 166; 128 ALD 489; [2012] FCAFC 90; BC201204504.
22 SZLPO v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (No 2) (2009) 108 ALD 303; 255 ALR 435; [2009] FCAFC 60; BC200904333.
23See for example the New South Wales and Victorian additional guiding principles for dealing with civil claims of child sexual abuse which are intended to complement their existing model litigant policies.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.