Australia: Lessons from Smith v Boné: Repayment arrangements and risks to directors

Last Updated: 25 May 2015
Article by Emily Plucknett and Toby Boys

Most Read Contributor in Australia, September 2016

The decision of the Federal Court in the case of Smith v Boné1 provides important judicial guidance on the requirements of the strict statutory duty upon directors to ensure that their company does not trade whilst insolvent.

The case examines in detail the impact that steps such as entering into repayment arrangements with creditors, including the Australian Taxation Office, may have upon the solvency of a company.

Remarkably, in this case, the director was found to have breached the insolvent trading legislation even though the company had entered into payments arrangements with the ATO which seemingly had the effect of deferring the time for payment.

The decision highlights the dangers for any director who fails to seek advice as to their company's solvency when seeking to trade out of financial difficulty.

Factual background

The case concerned an action by Petrolink Pty Ltd and its liquidator for relief against the first defendant, Barry Boné, in respect of losses suffered by creditors of Petrolink due to debts incurred whilst the company was insolvent. Mr Boné was the sole director of Petrolink.

The liquidator contended that Petrolink become insolvent on 30 June 2009, and remained insolvent until the company was placed into liquidation in December 2011.

Mr Boné conceded that Petrolink was insolvent from July 2011 only.

Effect of payment arrangements on debts due and payable

Section 588(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) imposes a strict duty upon directors to prevent a company from engaging in insolvent trading. The Court considers the company's solvency "at the time when the company incurs a debt".

In considering the ability of Petrolink to repay its debts when due and payable, the Court reviewed the records of Petrolink to discern the nature of arrangements entered into with its trade creditors and with the ATO.

In particular, the Court considered whether numerous written and oral payment arrangements with the ATO from June 2009 to December 2011 resulted in the tax liabilities the subject of the arrangements to no longer become due and payable, so that they could not taken into account in assessing the company's insolvency.

The Court found that the payment arrangements did not mean that the payments were no longer "due and payable". The effect of the payment arrangements was that the debt was merely deferred, but they remained "due and payable" at all times2.

The Court also reviewed the company's ability to pay its debts owed to trade creditors, in circumstances where Petrolink was "managing" its cash flow by paying creditors in installments. The Court found that there was unsatisfactory evidence as to the existence of the payment arrangements, in that generally Petrolink's creditors were acquiescing to receiving payment by installment rather than making explicit agreements to extend credit.

Accordingly, the Court considered that the repayment arrangements entered into by Petrolink as a whole demonstrated that the company was experiencing common features of insolvency. The Court, therefore, was satisfied that all debts incurred by Petrolink from May 2010 onwards were incurred at a time when the company was insolvent.

Personal liability of Mr Boné

The Court then considered whether Mr Boné had reasonable grounds for suspecting Petrolink's insolvency, and was therefore liable for insolvent trading under the Corporations Act.

The Court found that Mr Boné had reasonable (and, in fact, ample) grounds to suspect that Petrolink was insolvent, with the overall picture being one in which Petrolink was "managing" its relationships with its trade creditors by failing to make tax payments. In reaching that conclusion the court had regard to:

  • the company's inability to pay its tax liabilities at all times;
  • the company's progressive inability to pay trade creditors in a timely manner; and
  • advice received by Mr Boné in June 2010 that Petrolink had engaged in insolvent trading, albeit with the support of creditors, and may engage in insolvent trading in the future.

The Court confirmed that a director of reasonable competence may have taken some comfort from their ability to negotiate payment plans with the ATO, but the court also considered that a director would have recognised that those plans did not affect the status of the tax debt as one that was "due and payable".

The Court concluded that a director of ordinary competence would have had no real idea where the money to pay the company's debts would be found and the director ought to have concluded that Petrolink was insolvent.

Defence to insolvent trading

Mr Boné raised defences to the liquidators' claim against him.

In particular, under section 588H of the Corporations Act, it is a defence to proceedings for insolvent trading if, at the time the debt was incurred, the person had reasonable grounds to expect that the company is solvent and would remain so or, alternatively, took all reasonable steps to prevent the company from incurring the debt.

Mr Boné sought to rely upon the payment arrangements with the ATO as reasonable grounds for expecting that Petrolink was solvent, in addition to the company's generation of significant revenue.

The Court was quick to find that those matters were insufficient to demonstrate a reasonable expectation that the company was solvent. The court noted that the payment arrangements did not have the effect that Petrolink's tax debts were no longer due and payable. The fact that the company was generating significant revenue meant little while its debts remained unpaid.

Similarly, the Court rejected an argument that steps taken by Mr Boné to scale back Petrolink's operations and to reduce the number of employees supported a finding that reasonable steps were taken to prevent the company incurring debt within the meaning of section 588H.

Discretion to exclude from liability

Mr Boné sought relief from liability under to section 1317S or 1318 of the Corporations Act. Those provisions confer a very wide discretion on the court to allow company officers to escape liability under section 588G of the Act "in situations where it would be unjust and oppressive not to do so"3.

The question before the Court was whether Mr Boné "acted honourably, fairly, in good faith and in a common sense manner, as judged by the standards of others of a similar professional background"4.

While Mr Boné failed to respond to the clear signs that the company was insolvent, the Court was satisfied that Mr Boné did not conduct himself dishonestly.

However, the Court could not accept that Mr Boné's conduct was of a kind that warranted him being excused from liability. In this regard, the Court found that Mr Boné:

  • did not actively seek professional advice about the company's solvency;
  • was never advised during the period from May 2010 that Petrolink was solvent; and
  • was advised in June 2010 that Petrolink had previously engaged in insolvent trading, albeit with the support of creditors, and may engage in insolvent trading if it continues to trade.

Having regard to the payment arrangements entered into with the ATO, the Court could not be satisfied on the evidence before it that a reasonable, commercially experienced director would have made the arrangements without a clear plan as to how it the company would meet its obligations.

The Court commented that Mr Boné's conduct in dealing with the ATO and its trade creditors was not fair in the circumstances. To the contrary, the Court found that the conduct strongly suggested an attitude on Mr Boné's part that he was entitled to decide what was in the best interests of the creditors and that, in the case of the ATO, Petrolink was entitled to negotiate multiple repayment plans, even if full repayment would take years.

As such, the Court found that Mr Boné's conduct fell well short of the kind that would justify an exclusion from liability for contravention of section 588G.

The Court was satisfied that Mr Boné should pay compensation of $669,582.86, the total amount of the debts incurred and remaining unpaid during the period of insolvency, less a small amount for a shareholder loan made by Mr Boné prior to May 2010.

Lessons from Smith v Boné

The decision highlights that directors must carefully consider their statutory duties to ensure their company does not trade whilst insolvent when seeking to trade a company out of a difficult financial position.

Directors should not assume that entering into payment arrangements with creditors, including the ATO, will be sufficient to prevent the Company from being insolvent. Repayment arrangements are unlikely to change the status of debts which are due and payable, and the arrangements should not be relied upon in determining whether a company may be trading whilst insolvent.

While the provisions which aim to prevent insolvent are not intended to "hamstring" a company, nor require that every transaction be scrutinised because of an academic possibility that the company is trading whilst insolvent, the decision acts as a reminder to directors that they need to have regard to their company's ability to pay its debts as and when they become due for payment.

Additionally, the decision highlights the need for directors to seek appropriate advice in relation to their company's financial position in order to be capable of reaching a reasonably informed opinion as to the company's financial capacity.

The insolvent trading laws under the Act lack flexibility - once a director is unable to form a view, based on reasonable evidence, that the company is solvent the director must cease incurring liabilities or risk being personally liable under section 588G of the Act.

On the other hand, the irony of the situation is that most directors, particularly of smaller companies, have signed personal guarantees in respect to the company's debts, so there is incentive for directors to take steps to save the company's (and their own) fortunes, even that action puts the director at risk of liability under the "insolvent trading" provisions of the Corporations Act.


1 Smith v Boné, in the matter of ACN 002 864 002 Pty Ltd (in liq) [2015] FCA 319

2 This finding is consistent with section 255-15 of Schedule 1 to the Tax Administration Act 1953 (Cth). Whilst section 255-10 of Schedule 1 permits the Commissioner of Taxation to defer the time at which a liability becomes due and payable, the Court was satisfied that none of the numerous payment arrangements were to this effect.

3 As established in Daniels v Anderson (1995) 37 NSWLR 438 at 525; Hall v Poolman [2007] NSWSC 1330; (2007) 65 ACSR 123 at [315]

4 As established in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Edwards (No 3) [2006] NSWSC 376; (2006) 57 ACSR 209 at [10]

This publication does not deal with every important topic or change in law and is not intended to be relied upon as a substitute for legal or other advice that may be relevant to the reader's specific circumstances. If you have found this publication of interest and would like to know more or wish to obtain legal advice relevant to your circumstances please contact one of the named individuals listed.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Toby Boys
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.