Australia: Lessons from Smith v Boné: Repayment arrangements and risks to directors

Last Updated: 25 May 2015
Article by Emily Plucknett and Toby Boys

Most Read Contributor in Australia, August 2019

The decision of the Federal Court in the case of Smith v Boné1 provides important judicial guidance on the requirements of the strict statutory duty upon directors to ensure that their company does not trade whilst insolvent.

The case examines in detail the impact that steps such as entering into repayment arrangements with creditors, including the Australian Taxation Office, may have upon the solvency of a company.

Remarkably, in this case, the director was found to have breached the insolvent trading legislation even though the company had entered into payments arrangements with the ATO which seemingly had the effect of deferring the time for payment.

The decision highlights the dangers for any director who fails to seek advice as to their company's solvency when seeking to trade out of financial difficulty.

Factual background

The case concerned an action by Petrolink Pty Ltd and its liquidator for relief against the first defendant, Barry Boné, in respect of losses suffered by creditors of Petrolink due to debts incurred whilst the company was insolvent. Mr Boné was the sole director of Petrolink.

The liquidator contended that Petrolink become insolvent on 30 June 2009, and remained insolvent until the company was placed into liquidation in December 2011.

Mr Boné conceded that Petrolink was insolvent from July 2011 only.

Effect of payment arrangements on debts due and payable

Section 588(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) imposes a strict duty upon directors to prevent a company from engaging in insolvent trading. The Court considers the company's solvency "at the time when the company incurs a debt".

In considering the ability of Petrolink to repay its debts when due and payable, the Court reviewed the records of Petrolink to discern the nature of arrangements entered into with its trade creditors and with the ATO.

In particular, the Court considered whether numerous written and oral payment arrangements with the ATO from June 2009 to December 2011 resulted in the tax liabilities the subject of the arrangements to no longer become due and payable, so that they could not taken into account in assessing the company's insolvency.

The Court found that the payment arrangements did not mean that the payments were no longer "due and payable". The effect of the payment arrangements was that the debt was merely deferred, but they remained "due and payable" at all times2.

The Court also reviewed the company's ability to pay its debts owed to trade creditors, in circumstances where Petrolink was "managing" its cash flow by paying creditors in installments. The Court found that there was unsatisfactory evidence as to the existence of the payment arrangements, in that generally Petrolink's creditors were acquiescing to receiving payment by installment rather than making explicit agreements to extend credit.

Accordingly, the Court considered that the repayment arrangements entered into by Petrolink as a whole demonstrated that the company was experiencing common features of insolvency. The Court, therefore, was satisfied that all debts incurred by Petrolink from May 2010 onwards were incurred at a time when the company was insolvent.

Personal liability of Mr Boné

The Court then considered whether Mr Boné had reasonable grounds for suspecting Petrolink's insolvency, and was therefore liable for insolvent trading under the Corporations Act.

The Court found that Mr Boné had reasonable (and, in fact, ample) grounds to suspect that Petrolink was insolvent, with the overall picture being one in which Petrolink was "managing" its relationships with its trade creditors by failing to make tax payments. In reaching that conclusion the court had regard to:

  • the company's inability to pay its tax liabilities at all times;
  • the company's progressive inability to pay trade creditors in a timely manner; and
  • advice received by Mr Boné in June 2010 that Petrolink had engaged in insolvent trading, albeit with the support of creditors, and may engage in insolvent trading in the future.

The Court confirmed that a director of reasonable competence may have taken some comfort from their ability to negotiate payment plans with the ATO, but the court also considered that a director would have recognised that those plans did not affect the status of the tax debt as one that was "due and payable".

The Court concluded that a director of ordinary competence would have had no real idea where the money to pay the company's debts would be found and the director ought to have concluded that Petrolink was insolvent.

Defence to insolvent trading

Mr Boné raised defences to the liquidators' claim against him.

In particular, under section 588H of the Corporations Act, it is a defence to proceedings for insolvent trading if, at the time the debt was incurred, the person had reasonable grounds to expect that the company is solvent and would remain so or, alternatively, took all reasonable steps to prevent the company from incurring the debt.

Mr Boné sought to rely upon the payment arrangements with the ATO as reasonable grounds for expecting that Petrolink was solvent, in addition to the company's generation of significant revenue.

The Court was quick to find that those matters were insufficient to demonstrate a reasonable expectation that the company was solvent. The court noted that the payment arrangements did not have the effect that Petrolink's tax debts were no longer due and payable. The fact that the company was generating significant revenue meant little while its debts remained unpaid.

Similarly, the Court rejected an argument that steps taken by Mr Boné to scale back Petrolink's operations and to reduce the number of employees supported a finding that reasonable steps were taken to prevent the company incurring debt within the meaning of section 588H.

Discretion to exclude from liability

Mr Boné sought relief from liability under to section 1317S or 1318 of the Corporations Act. Those provisions confer a very wide discretion on the court to allow company officers to escape liability under section 588G of the Act "in situations where it would be unjust and oppressive not to do so"3.

The question before the Court was whether Mr Boné "acted honourably, fairly, in good faith and in a common sense manner, as judged by the standards of others of a similar professional background"4.

While Mr Boné failed to respond to the clear signs that the company was insolvent, the Court was satisfied that Mr Boné did not conduct himself dishonestly.

However, the Court could not accept that Mr Boné's conduct was of a kind that warranted him being excused from liability. In this regard, the Court found that Mr Boné:

  • did not actively seek professional advice about the company's solvency;
  • was never advised during the period from May 2010 that Petrolink was solvent; and
  • was advised in June 2010 that Petrolink had previously engaged in insolvent trading, albeit with the support of creditors, and may engage in insolvent trading if it continues to trade.

Having regard to the payment arrangements entered into with the ATO, the Court could not be satisfied on the evidence before it that a reasonable, commercially experienced director would have made the arrangements without a clear plan as to how it the company would meet its obligations.

The Court commented that Mr Boné's conduct in dealing with the ATO and its trade creditors was not fair in the circumstances. To the contrary, the Court found that the conduct strongly suggested an attitude on Mr Boné's part that he was entitled to decide what was in the best interests of the creditors and that, in the case of the ATO, Petrolink was entitled to negotiate multiple repayment plans, even if full repayment would take years.

As such, the Court found that Mr Boné's conduct fell well short of the kind that would justify an exclusion from liability for contravention of section 588G.

The Court was satisfied that Mr Boné should pay compensation of $669,582.86, the total amount of the debts incurred and remaining unpaid during the period of insolvency, less a small amount for a shareholder loan made by Mr Boné prior to May 2010.

Lessons from Smith v Boné

The decision highlights that directors must carefully consider their statutory duties to ensure their company does not trade whilst insolvent when seeking to trade a company out of a difficult financial position.

Directors should not assume that entering into payment arrangements with creditors, including the ATO, will be sufficient to prevent the Company from being insolvent. Repayment arrangements are unlikely to change the status of debts which are due and payable, and the arrangements should not be relied upon in determining whether a company may be trading whilst insolvent.

While the provisions which aim to prevent insolvent are not intended to "hamstring" a company, nor require that every transaction be scrutinised because of an academic possibility that the company is trading whilst insolvent, the decision acts as a reminder to directors that they need to have regard to their company's ability to pay its debts as and when they become due for payment.

Additionally, the decision highlights the need for directors to seek appropriate advice in relation to their company's financial position in order to be capable of reaching a reasonably informed opinion as to the company's financial capacity.

The insolvent trading laws under the Act lack flexibility - once a director is unable to form a view, based on reasonable evidence, that the company is solvent the director must cease incurring liabilities or risk being personally liable under section 588G of the Act.

On the other hand, the irony of the situation is that most directors, particularly of smaller companies, have signed personal guarantees in respect to the company's debts, so there is incentive for directors to take steps to save the company's (and their own) fortunes, even that action puts the director at risk of liability under the "insolvent trading" provisions of the Corporations Act.


1 Smith v Boné, in the matter of ACN 002 864 002 Pty Ltd (in liq) [2015] FCA 319

2 This finding is consistent with section 255-15 of Schedule 1 to the Tax Administration Act 1953 (Cth). Whilst section 255-10 of Schedule 1 permits the Commissioner of Taxation to defer the time at which a liability becomes due and payable, the Court was satisfied that none of the numerous payment arrangements were to this effect.

3 As established in Daniels v Anderson (1995) 37 NSWLR 438 at 525; Hall v Poolman [2007] NSWSC 1330; (2007) 65 ACSR 123 at [315]

4 As established in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Edwards (No 3) [2006] NSWSC 376; (2006) 57 ACSR 209 at [10]

This publication does not deal with every important topic or change in law and is not intended to be relied upon as a substitute for legal or other advice that may be relevant to the reader's specific circumstances. If you have found this publication of interest and would like to know more or wish to obtain legal advice relevant to your circumstances please contact one of the named individuals listed.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions