Australia: Determining minimum unit sizes in the residential flat design code


The Land and Environment Court (Court) has handed down judgment on minimum unit sizes required by State Environmental Planning Policy No 65 (Design Quality of Residential Flat Development) (SEPP 65) and the Residential Flat Design Code (Code).

While the Code's minimum unit sizes have previously been considered outside of SEPP 65, the Court in Botany Bay City Council v Botany Development Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] NSWLEC 55 held that, under SEPP 65, minimum unit sizes were not those set out in the Rules of Thumb contained in the Code. Rather, they are set out in the Code's table in Part 3, which specifies the internal and external areas for nine different apartment "types".

The practical effect of this decision is that, where SEPP 65 is applicable, the larger minimum unit sizes in the table (both internal and external) must be utilised. The smaller minimum unit sizes in the Rule of Thumb (1 bedroom: 50m2; 2 bedroom: 70m2; 3 bedroom: 95m2) are not relevant.


The respondent, Botany Development Pty Ltd (Botany Development), made a development application for the demolition of improvements on land, the construction of a 3 – 6 storey residential development containing 158 units, and associated works (Proposed Development).

Development consent for the Proposed Development was granted by Brown C of the Land and Environment Court (Court). In granting consent, the Commissioner determined that:

  1. the apartment sizes in the Proposed Development met the recommended internal and external areas in the Residential Flat Design Code (Code);
  2. therefore, by virtue of clause 30A(1)(b) of State Environmental Planning Policy No 65 (Design Quality of Residential Flat Development) (SEPP 65), consent to the Proposed Development could not be refused on the basis of unit size;
  3. therefore, the minimum unit sizes contained in clause 4C.5.1 of the(DCP) could not be a reason for refusing consent; and
    The City of Botany Bay Development Control Plan 2013
  4. in any case, the effect of clause 6 of SEPP 65 was that the minimum unit sizes in SEPP 65 prevailed to the extent of any inconsistency with the DCP relating to minimum unit size.

The appellant, Botany Bay City Council (Council), brought an appeal under section 56A of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, heard by Sheahan J, claiming that Brown C erred in law by determining that "unit size" should not be a reason for refusing consent to the Proposed Development.

Fundamental to the appeal was the consideration of what were the minimum unit sizes in the Code for the purpose of SEPP 65 and whether the Proposed Development met those sizes.

The parties' competing claims concerning minimum unit sizes were both informed by the contents of Part 3 of the Code and, specifically, the contents under the heading "Building Configuration (Apartment Layout)". Council claimed that the minimum unit sizes were contained in a table within that section, which set out the internal and external areas for nine different types of apartments (MUS Table). The MUS Table is reproduced at the end of this article.

Botany Development, on the other hand, claimed that the minimum unit sizes were those set out in the "Rule of Thumb" within that section (MUS Rule of Thumb), being:

  • 1 bedroom apartment 50m2;
  • 2 bedroom apartment 70m2; and
  • 3 bedroom apartment 95m2.

All of the apartments in the Proposed Development exceeded the sizes set out in the MUS Rule of Thumb. However, only 63% of the apartments exceeded the sizes set out in the MUS Table.


The Court was directed to two prior decisions involving minimum unit sizes under the Code:

  1. Botany Bay City Council v Marana Developments Pty Ltd [2012] NSWLEC 15 (Marana Case); and
  2. Botany Bay City Council v Minister for Planning and Infrastructure [2015] NSWLEC 12 (MPI Case).

Although the Marana Case concerned minimum unit sizes under SEPP 65, the development at issue in that case met the standards in both the MUS Table and the MUS Rule of Thumb. Sheahan J noted that as the decision in the Marana Case proceeded on the basis that the minimum areas were found in both the MUS Table and the MUS Rule of Thumb, the decision was not determinative of the issue currently subject to appeal.

The MPI Case concerned an application for approval of a residential development under Part 3A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. In determining the application, the Planning Assessment Commission imposed a condition on the approval requiring all unit sizes to "meet the requirements of the [Code]".

On appeal to the Court in the MPI Case, the parties disputed whether the minimum unit sizes in the Code were those contained in the MUS Table or the MUS Rule of Thumb. Unlike the proceedings before Sheahan J, this issue in the MPI Case was only considered in the context of the requirements of an approval. The minimum unit sizes in that case could, therefore, be determined without reference to SEPP 65.

On this basis, the Court in the MPI Case held that the minimum unit sizes in the Code were to be determined only by reference to the wording of the Code. Sheahan quoted the relevant part of the judgment in the MPI Case as follows [at 144-145]:

144 It was unfortunate that the condition ... used the phrase "requirements of the [Code]". As noted the [Code] does not of itself have the force of law. Moreover the language of the entire document is anything but prescriptive. Thus the [Code] refers to the table in [129] and the apartment designs as merely "provid[ing] information" and as being only "examples" for use as a "comparative tool". They are said to be useful for "recognising well-organised, functional and high quality apartment layouts". It does not purport to suggest that the apartment types are mandatory or that the apartment areas listed represent some minimum standard. This is only reinforced by the introductory section of the [Code] noted in [127] which describes the "directive text", being the area that includes the table noted in [129], as only "outlin[ing] better design practice guidelines and provide[ing] some possible design solutions for achieving the guidelines." The areas listed in the table noted in [129] simply cannot be described as "[u]nit size requirements".
145 In general parlance "rules of thumb" do not constitute "requirements". Instead they are guidelines that lack exactitude. Further the apartment areas listed in the last dot point in [131] are described as able to be used "as a guide" and the areas are 'suggest[ed]" to be used. However they are far more easily characterised as "requirements" than the table noted in [129]. They are at least described as being "rules" (albeit "rules of thumb") and are referred to as "minimum apartment sizes" (albeit to be used "as a guide"). Further the rules use more exhortatory language than the descriptive text in that they advise what "should be" done, as opposed to merely "provid[ing] information" and listing "examples" for use as a "comparative tool". To some extent the description of the "rules of thumb" in [127] support this in that they reiterate their role in recommending "minimum standards" albeit as a "guide for local decision making."

[emphasis added]

While this reasoning supported the submissions of Botany Development, Sheahan J determined that it was not relevant to the present appeal, where minimum unit sizes were required to be determined in the context of SEPP 65.


Clause 30A(1)(b) of SEPP 65 states:

(1) A consent authority must not refuse consent to a development application for the carrying out of residential flat development on any of the following grounds:


(b) apartment area: if the proposed area for each apartment is equal to, or greater than, the recommended internal area and external area for the relevant apartment type set out in Part 3 of the [Code].

[emphasis added]

The Court observed that it is only the MUS Table that contains recommended areas for both "internal" and "external" areas. The MUS Rule of Thumb refers only to a minimum total apartment area.

Further, the Court held that the term "relevant apartment type" was a clear reference to the nine apartment types identified in the MUS Table.

Although Botany Development submitted that the Code had been drafted with the "recommended minimums" contained within the Rules of Thumb (as held by the Court in the MPI Case), Sheahan J held that:

"... the language of the provision to be interpreted must take priority. Clause 30A(1)(b) refers to internal and external areas; hence, the only possible construction available for those words is that they were referring to the table, and not the Rules of Thumb."

[emphasis added]

For these reasons, the minimum areas referred to in clause 30A(1)(b) of SEPP 65 were to be found in the MUS Table and not the MUS Rule of Thumb.

As not all of the units within the Proposed Development met the minimum unit sizes in the MUS Table, the proceedings were remitted to Brown C for determination in light of the Court's findings.


In the context of clause 30A(1)(b) of SEPP 65, minimum unit sizes must be determined by reference to the MUS Table.

However, when considered in the absence of SEPP 65, such as in the MPI Case, minimum unit sizes will be determined by reference to the MUS Rules of Thumb.

This is an important distinction for both applicants for development consent and consent authorities.


Apartment Type



03.01 Studio

Internal Area



External Area


03.02 One bedroom,

Internal Area


cross through

External Area


03.03 One bedroom

Internal Area



External Area


03.04 One bedroom

Internal Area


single aspect

External Area


03.05 Two bedroom

Internal Area



External Area


03.06 Two bedroom

Internal Area


cross through

External Area


03.07 Two bedroom

Internal Area



External Area


03.08 Two bedroom

Internal Area


corner with study

External Area


03.09 Three bedroom

Internal Area



External Area


The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Most awarded firm and Australian deal of the year
Australasian Legal Business Awards
Employer of Choice for Women
Equal Opportunity for Women
in the Workplace (EOWA)

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions