Australia: Environmental & Public Law Bulletin

Last Updated: 1 March 2006

High Court Confirms 5-Year Lapsing Period For Resource Consents
Article by Melanie Gordon

Originally published in the Environmental & Public Law Bulletin (NZ), February 2006

In December last year the High Court held that the Resource Management Amendment Act 2003 extended the default lapsing period for all unimplemented resource consents from two to five years.

It was always clear that the Resource Management Amendment Act 2003 (the Amendment Act) altered the period between commencement of a resource consent and its expiry from two to five years for all new consents issued after 1 August 2003. In Re Auckland City Council, the Environment Court had held that this extended period applied to all consents, whether issued before 1 August 2003 or after. The Art Deco Society (Auckland) Inc appealed that decision, arguing that the BNZ’s resource consent to demolish the Jean Batten State Building and other surrounding buildings expires two years from when it was issued, not five.

The appeal was unsuccessful. The High Court, like the Environment Court, held that the extended period introduced by the Amendment Act also applied to consents that existed before 1 August 2003.

As a starting point, the Court determined that the natural and ordinary meaning of the amended Act is that all resource consents in existence from 1 August 2003 onwards will have a 5 year term. The Court found that this is consistent with the principle that legislation is given a commonsense interpretation, in accordance with ordinary notions of fairness.

In considering whether this interpretation was indeed ‘fair’, the Court examined how the extension of the default lapsing period for consents that were issued prior to 1 August 2003 would affect existing rights or interests. The Court noted that although the public’s ability to observe and challenge extension requests after the two year expiry will be effected if a further three years is granted, this does not amount to such unfairness that it would warrant an interpretation of the amendment that is different from the ordinary, natural and ‘perfectly logical’ meaning.

This is a significant decision for the holders of resource consents that were granted before 1 August 2003 and which do not specify an alternative lapsing period. These consents now lapse after five years, which means that some may have close to three years still to run.

Court’s Scrutiny No Longer Needed To Make Plans, Policy Statements Operative In Part
Article by Michaela Stirling

Another effect of the 2005 Resource Management Act (RMA) amendments is that Councils no longer need to apply to the Environment Court to make a proposed policy statement or plan partly operative.

The Court confirmed in Karaka Lakes Ltd & others v Papakura District Council (ENV A 270/05) that as a result of the amendments it no longer has jurisdiction to hear an application to make a plan operative in part. The amendments delete the phrase ‘with the consent of the Environment Court’ from Clause 17(2) of the 1st Schedule, allowing a Council to simply resolve to make a plan change or a change to a policy statement partly operative without applying to the Court.

While the effect of s19 RMA means that many proposed rules in a plan change can be deemed to be operative straight away if they are not challenged during the appeal period on the Council’s decision, there is still pressure on Councils from those wanting to rely on new plan change provisions to make as many of the underlying objectives and policies operative through the Clause 17 process as possible.

In the Karaka Lakes decision, the referrer had applied for a direction to make part of a proposed plan change operative with the consent of the Council and remaining referrers. The plan change had been notified before the 2005 amendments took effect, but the Court noted that – unlike most of the 2005 changes which do not apply to plan changes notified before the amendments took effect - s131(8) of the transitional provisions expressly states that the deletion to Clause 17(2) applies immediately.

The Court’s scrutiny of past Clause 17(2) applications has been a final check and balance to determine whether an outstanding appeal will be prejudiced by making parts of a plan change operative before that appeal is resolved. Now, however, a Council can make its own determination of whether an appeal will be prejudiced without this review by the Court. The only avenues available to an affected appellant will be to apply for a declaration or judicial review of the Council’s decision if it does not agree.

We consider good practice requires Councils to exercise this power carefully and, in addition to seeking their own internal advice, requires them to consult with appellants to obtain their views on the scope of their appeals before making a resolution under Clause 17(2).

Case note – Wise v Thames-Coromandel District Council High Court, Auckland, 14 December 2005, CIV-2004-485-278, Frater J
Article by Kathy Wilson

The change from a mandatory to a discretionary permitted baseline test (by virtue of the 2003 RMA Amendments) means that consent authorities can now consider the appropriateness of applying the permitted baseline on a case by case basis. To date, the new test has received little judicial attention, so there has been limited help from the courts on how it will apply in practice.

One particular issue for authorities is what procedure, if any, should be followed if it decides the baseline should not apply. A recent decision of the High Court Wise v Thames-Coromandel District Council (High Court, Auckland, 14 December 2005, CIV-2004-485-278, Frater J) sheds some light on this issue.

The appeal in Wise was from an Environment Court decision confirming the Thames-Coromandel District Council’s decision to decline a subdivision consent. The proposed subdivision was in a location near Whangamata in an area with a low residential density and a semi-rural character. The proposal did not meet either the minimum lot area or the average net lot requirements in the plan.

The decision of the Environment Court focused on the effect that the proposal would have on the character and amenity of the area. The Environment Court did not mention the permitted baseline in its judgment and, subsequently, failure to take the baseline into account was raised as a ground on appeal. The High Court found that because the Environment Court had not mentioned the baseline in its decision, it could not be satisfied that the baseline had been taken into account and strictly speaking there had been an error of law. After reviewing the transcripts of the hearing Justice Frater noted that the Environment Court had been mindful of the baseline test, had considered evidence on the point and it had factored in its decision. As a result the error of law had not been material to the outcome and the appeal was dismissed.

While this decision has to be read with caution (as the pre-2003 baseline test is applied, at the relevant time consideration of the baseline was still mandatory), it still provides a useful insight into how the issue might be approached in the future. To reduce the risk of the baseline being used as a ground of appeal or review, consent authorities should, in each case, consider whether the baseline should be applied or not. In other words, an authority must at least turn its mind to the baseline and if its decision is not to apply it, then it should record the reasons why it was considered inappropriate.

Case note – Remarkables Park Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council (C13/2006)
Article by Lauren Lagman

An appellant may be obliged to pay substantial (higher than usual) costs if it withdraws its appeal at a late stage, and where that appeal appears to have been lodged for improper or collateral purposes.

In this case, the developer, Remarkables Park, appealed against the Council’s decision to decline variation of a condition of its resource consent. However, it withdrew its appeal after the parties had already prepared and exchanged evidence.

The Court took the view that Remarkables Park had lodged the appeal as tactical leverage for negotiations with another party, and doubted that it had been ‘really serious’ about proceeding with the hearing, warning that ‘an appeal under the RMA is not a bargaining chip’.

Besides putting the other parties to unnecessary costs, costs that would be unfairly borne by the public purse, in the Court’s opinion, ‘such actions come close to being an abuse of the Court’s processes’.

The appellant was ordered to pay more than three quarters of each of the other two parties’ total costs.

The Court also ruled that a further reply in response to a reply on costs cannot be provided as of right. Leave is required, consistent with the general practice of allowing parties to address the Court only once on any issue. Thus in this case leave was not granted, and replies already submitted by the parties were not considered.

This publication is intended as a first point of reference and should not be relied on as a substitute for professional advice. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular circumstances and no liability will be accepted for any losses incurred by those relying solely on this publication.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.