Australia: Monthly Update—Australian Labour & Employment - December 2014

Last Updated: 30 December 2014
Article by Adam Salter


This month, we discuss how economic pressures affecting the resources sector are resulting in increases in Australia's unemployment rate and in industrial action. We also discuss recent legislation the Federal Government has introduced to try to limit such industrial action. We discuss a recent decision of the District Court, Mitchell-Innes v Willis Australia Group Services Pty Ltd (No 2), in which approximately $300,000 in damages were awarded to an executive who was wrongfully dismissed for being intoxicated at work, and Justice Gleeson's decision in Schmitt v Carter, which has broad consequences for all employment claims brought against employers in administration. 


Steady rise in unemployment rate

Since April 2012, Australia's unemployment rate has steadily climbed from 4.9 percent to its current high of 6.3 percent (the highest it has been in 12 years).

2015 is likely to see further increases in unemployment as the resources sector slows down off the back of declining commodities prices. Since February 2013, global iron ore prices have fallen from approximately USD 150 per ton to USD 73 per ton. Oil prices have similarly dropped from a high of USD 108 per barrel (in June 2014) to recent lows of USD 77 per barrel. Declining commodities prices can be expected to affect the profitability of many Australian mining operations and will most certainly stagnate development in new mining ventures.

Additionally, large Australian employers outside of the resources sector are feeling the pinch and laying off large numbers of staff, both in the private and public sectors. For example, according to the Community and Public Sector Union's Nadine Flood, the Australian Government has slashed more than 8,000 public service jobs in 2014 in an attempt to reduce budget deficits partly caused by falling tax revenue from mining profits.

Worsening industrial relations in the mining industry

The resources slowdown is not just causing an increase in the unemployment rate; it is also promoting fractured labour relations at some of Australia's largest resources projects. The Maritime Union of Australia (MUA) has been involved in significant disputes with DP World at Fremantle (near Perth), Teekay Shipping at Port Hedland and Chevron and its contractor Mermaid Marine at the Gorgon project in Western Australia.

The Australian Mines and Metals Association has accused the MUA of "waging some sort of misguided industrial war against the resources industry", and the Royal Commission into Trade Union Governance and Corruption heard that $1 million was paid to a MUA training fund to resolve a labour dispute over foreign crewing off Western Australia. Major employers involved in Western Australia are publicly lobbying the Australian Government to make its industrial policies and regulations competitive globally. Labour unions and employers alike know that a crunch time is approaching. We anticipate a worsening of labour relations as each side of the negotiating table seeks to protect the interests of its constituency.


Federal Government attempts to introduce legislation to limit industrial action

The Fair Work Amendment (Bargaining Processes) Bill 2014 was introduced into the Federal Parliament on 27 November 2014. If passed into law, the bill will amend sections 187 and 443 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) to:

  • Require the Fair Work Commission, when approving a collective bargaining agreement (enterprise agreement), to be satisfied that the employer and employees, when bargaining for the agreement, discussed ways to improve productivity in the workplace; and
  • Prevent the Fair Work Commission from making a protected action ballot order (which allows employees to engage in protected industrial action) where it is satisfied that either: (i) the employees' claims are manifestly excessive (having regard to the conditions at the workplace and the industry in which the employer operates); or (ii) if implemented, the employees' requests would have a significant adverse impact on productivity in the workplace.

Whether the proposed legislation will pass through the Australian Senate and be introduced into law is unclear. Many of the Federal Government's recent reforms have been frustrated by an adversarial Senate.

Employers battling with unions in the Fair Work Commission and who are about to commence enterprise bargaining negotiations will be following the bill's progress carefully.


District Court awards nearly $300,000 to General Manager wrongfully dismissed for intoxication at work

In Mitchell-Innes v Willis Australia Group Services Pty Ltd (No 2) (Unreported, District Court of New South Wales, Taylor DCJ, 8 December 2014), Donald Mitchell-Innes sued his employer, Willis Australia Group Services (Willis) for wrongful dismissal after Willis summarily dismissed Mr Mitchell-Innes for what it believed was gross misconduct: being drunk at work. Taylor DCJ found that the plaintiff had been wrongfully dismissed and ordered Willis to pay nearly $300,000 in damages.


On 30 October 2012, Mr Mitchell-Innes travelled to Melbourne to attend a work conference. The night before the conference, Mr Mitchell-Innes attended dinner and drinks with colleagues, during the course of which he admitted to consuming 17 standard drinks. On the following morning, Mr Mitchell-Innes arrived at the conference and appeared intoxicated. Senior colleagues reported that he was "smelling strongly of alcohol ... talking loudly, slurring his words, making animal noises and throwing lollies".


Whilst Taylor DCJ found that Mr Mitchell-Innes' behaviour constituted misconduct, he was not convinced that the misconduct was sufficiently serious to justify summary dismissal. His Honour noted that a single act of misconduct can justify summary dismissal, although that misconduct must be "of such aggravated character that it strikes the employment contract down immediately, completely and permanently."

A clause in Mr Mitchell-Innes' employment contract stated: "a condition of your employment is compliance with any policies and procedures [of the] Willis Group...". The policies included the "Code of Work" policy and "Disciplinary Counselling" policy, both of which included prohibitions against being intoxicated at work. Both of these policies contemplated summary dismissal only when an employee's actions could "seriously damage Willis' reputation" or "endanger the well-being of Willis' staff".

Taylor DCJ determined that this clause meant Willis' policies were incorporated by reference within Mr Mitchell-Innes' employment contract. Taylor DCJ was not convinced that Mr Mitchell-Innes' misconduct resulted in either serious damage to Willis' reputation or endangered the well-being of Willis' staff. Accordingly, Willis was effectively restrained from summarily dismissing Mr Mitchell-Innes because of the restrictions it imposed on itself in its employment policies.

His Honour cited a series of mitigating factors that reduced the seriousness of Mr Mitchell-Innes' misconduct, including:

  • The plaintiff's long and blemish-free record of employment with Willis;
  • A culture within the firm that encouraged the consumption of alcohol with colleagues and clients;
  • The plaintiff caused no reputational damage to the firm because no clients were present to witness the plaintiff's behaviour; and
  • The plaintiff did not damage staff morale or staff discipline within the firm.

Taylor DCJ awarded the plaintiff $296,650.75 damages, the sum representing lost salary, a lost retention bonus, lost long service leave entitlements and pre-judgment interest.

Lessons for Employers

This decision makes it clear that intoxication at work will not always justify summary dismissal. Courts will carefully construe the employment contract, employment policies and the company's "culture" to determine the seriousness of any employee misconduct.

Employers should be careful not to draft employment contracts and employment policies in a way which limits their flexibility when responding to and dealing with employee misconduct (as Willis' policy did by requiring serious damage to the firm's reputation or endangerment to the well-being of Willis staff to justify summary dismissal).

Federal Court orders that damages in a unlawful termination claim are not a priority payment in the winding up of the employer

Section 556 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) requires that certain employee entitlements be paid in priority to unsecured debts in the case of the winding up of the employer. These priority payments include:

  • Payments of wages and superannuation entitlements owing to the employees;
  • Payments made as compensation for workplace injuries (workers' compensation payments);
  • Payments for accrued leave entitlements; and
  • Retrenchment payments.

In Schmitt v Carter [2014] FCA 1370, Mr Schmitt worked as the Chief Financial Officer of CMA Corporation Limited; for much of his employment, he was also a Director of CMA. Mr Schmitt was dismissed summarily and commenced proceedings against CMA for unlawful termination. A few months after he commenced proceedings, CMA entered into voluntary administration. CMA obtained a stay of the wrongful dismissal proceedings upon entering into voluntary administration.

Mr Schmitt approached the Federal Court seeking an order that any damages he obtain in the wrongful dismissal proceedings be paid in priority to other unsecured debts as "retrenchment payments" within the meaning of section 556 of the Act.

The Act defines a retrenchment payment as:

an amount payable by the company to the employee, by virtue of an industrial instrument (which includes an employment contract), in respect of the termination of the employee's employment by the company, whether the amount becomes payable before, on or after the relevant date.

Justice Gleeson decided that the damages Mr Schmitt sought, if payable, would not be an amount payable by virtue of the employment contract because his claim was not an amount payable by the company (yet). Justice Gleeson said (at 47):

Although there is an obvious connection between the employment contract and the plaintiff's claim, that claim cannot be described as an amount payable 'by virtue of' the employment contract because the plaintiff's claim arose only upon the termination of the contract.

This broad principle presents problems for any employment-related claims which may be made against a company in administration.

It is interesting that Justice Gleeson chose to develop her reasoning so broadly as it wasn't strictly necessary for Her Honour to address this issue, since Mr Schmitt wasn't eligible for a priority payment because he was a director of CMA at the relevant time and the exception within subsection 556 (1C) of the Act prevents him from claiming priority.


Thanks to associates Michael Whitbread and Viv Jones and Summer Clerk William Maher for their assistance in the preparation of this Update.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Adam Salter
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.