ARTICLE
11 December 2014

Are restraints in an employment context enforceable?

WT
Watkins Tapsell

Contributor

Watkins Tapsell is a client-focused law firm with over 50 years of experience. They provide comprehensive legal support to families, individuals, small businesses, and larger companies. With six Partners and a dedicated team, they prioritize exceeding client expectations by anticipating legal changes and adapting their services to meet evolving needs. Building long-term relationships is a core value for Watkins Tapsell.
A restraint clause must be carefully drafted, to consider all specific facts about both the employer and the employee.
Australia Employment and HR

I am regularly asked the question – "Are restraints in an employment context enforceable"?

A restraint of trade clause is presumed void as it is against public policy to prevent a person from working.

However, all is not lost! Restraints are enforced by the court when the employer has a genuine interest to protect, and when the restraint is no wider than needed to protect that interest.

For a restraint clause to be enforceable, it must be carefully drafted taking into consideration all the facts about both the employer and the employee.

Accordingly, it is important that a restraint clause not be a standard "off the shelf" clause as it may fail the test of reasonableness imposed by the courts.

When entering an employment contract with key employees , legal advice should be sought to protect the business.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More