Australia: Australian banks in New York and the risk of exposure to legal proceedings in the United States

The year 2014 has seen three key decisions by US courts clarifying the extent to which non-US banks that maintain a branch in New York can be sued in the United States. With a number of Australian banks now having a branch or office presence in New York, these recent cases con?rm that Australian banks have a solid legal basis for resisting subpoenas, court orders and the like served only on their New York offices, but which seek documents and/or assets held outside the United States.

Risks to Australian banks operating in the United States

In a global market, Australian banks increasingly have a presence beyond Australian shores. Engagement, however, with the international ?nancial market brings with it risks for Australian banks. For those banks operating a branch or office in the United States, a key risk is becoming embroiled in litigation before the US courts.

Involvement in transnational litigation is not only costly, but also exposes litigants to the peculiarities of each jurisdiction. With regards to the United States, these risks include:

  • the use and availability of class action procedures;
  • punitive damages (ie, damages awarded to punish a party's conduct in addition to compensatory damages to restore a party to the position that it would have been in but for litigated event); and
  • different fee and costs structures (eg, contingency fees are an accepted practice by attorneys in the United States and, save for certain exemptions, a successful party to litigation is not able to recover their costs).

Given these risks, Australian banks should be able to take comfort from recent cases which suggest that a mere office or branch in the United States is insufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the US courts.

Operating a branch in the United States — what jurisdiction do US courts have?

The decisions of Daimler AG v Bauman 1 and Gliklad v Bank Hapoalim, BM 2 make clear that where a foreign corporation operates a subsidiary or a branch in the United States, then US courts will not have jurisdiction to hear matters involving that corporation where the matter has no relationship to the subsidiary's activities in the United States — something more is required.

Daimler involved a group of Argentinean residents ?ling suit in the federal court of California against the German public company DaimlerChryslerAktiengesellschaft (Daimler). The plaintiffs alleged that Mercedes-Benz Argentina, the Argentinean subsidiary of Daimler, collaborated with state security forces during Argentina's 1976–83 "Dirty War" to kidnap, detain, torture and kill certain Mercedes-Benz Argentina workers, among them the plaintiffs or persons closely related to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs sought damages from Daimler for the alleged human-rights violations under the laws of the United States, California and Argentina.

A key issue for determination was whether, in circumstances where the plaintiffs' claims arose entirely outside California and against a foreign entity, a Californian court had jurisdiction to deal with the matter.

The plaintiffs sought to invoke personal jurisdiction over Daimler on the basis that another of Daimler's subsidiaries, Mercedes-Benz USA (MBUSA), undertook certain activities in California. Although MBUSA was incorporated in Delaware with its principal place of business in New Jersey, it distributed Daimlermanufactured vehicles to independent dealerships around the United States, including in California. The plaintiffs argued that personal jurisdiction over MBUSA could be established on the basis of its extensive business activities within California. It was argued that this personal jurisdiction could then be imputed to Daimler.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the exercise of jurisdiction on these grounds, ?nding that MBUSA was Daimler's "agent" for jurisdictional purposes. The Supreme Court reversed the Ninth Circuit's ruling, in a decision which addressed the question of jurisdiction in this context for the ?rst time.

The Supreme Court considered that the agency theory adopted by the lower courts would "subject foreign corporations to general jurisdiction whenever they have an in-state subsidiary or affiliate, an outcome that would sweep beyond even the sprawling view of general jurisdiction". 3

Instead, the court found the relevant question to be whether a corporation's affiliations with the state are so continuous and systematic as to render it essentially at home in the forum state. Whether the corporation is incorporated or has its principal place of business in the forum state will be signi?cant in establishing whether the corporation is "essentially at home" in that state.

Here the court found that the Ninth Circuit erred in concluding that it had jurisdiction to hear the matter. Neither Daimler nor MBUSA was incorporated in California, nor had its principal place of business in that state. That being the case, jurisdiction could only be invoked where Daimler was "essentially at home" in California on some other grounds. The court held that even MBUSA's business activities in California were not sufficient to prove that either corporation was essentially at home in that state.

Although Daimler was a decision involving a foreign corporation's subsidiary, it established the framework through which the New York Supreme Court could mould the decision to apply to the banking sphere in Gliklad.

In Gliklad, Mr Gliklad served a subpoena and retraining notice on the New York branch of Bank Hapoalim to enforce a $505 million judgment obtained against Mr Cherney, a judgment debtor. Mr Gliklad sought the turnover of assets purportedly held in Mr Cherney's accounts at non-US branches.

The New York Supreme Court held that maintaining a branch in New York is not a sufficient basis to assert personal jurisdiction over the bank. The New York branch is a separate legal entity and service of process on the branch does not mandate the turnover of documents or assets held at other branches located outside the United States.

This decision highlights that a foreign bank will not be subjected to the jurisdiction of US courts simply because it maintains a branch in the United States, in circumstances where the claims have no relationship to the bank's activities in the United States.

Passing funds through US banks — does this give US courts jurisdiction?

The jurisdiction of United States courts over foreign banks was also at issue in Mashreqbank PSC v Ahmed Hamad Al Gosaibi & Bros Co. 4 This matter involved a dispute between a UnitedArab Emirates bank, Mashreqbank, and AHAB, a Saudi Arabian partnership, regarding a foreign exchange swap transaction. The transaction contemplated that Mashreqbank transfer $150 million to AHAB's account at Bank of America in New York, in exchange for AHAB paying the equivalent value in Saudi riyals. Mashreqbank upheld its end of the bargain, but AHAB did not.

Mashreq sued AHAB to collect the alleged debt in the New York state court, on the assumption that AHAB held assets in New York. In response, AHAB ?led a third-party complaint against one of its employees, alleging that he had fraudulently arranged the transaction and that Mashreq aided and abetted his fraud.

At ?rst instance, the court dismissed the proceedings on the grounds of forum non conveniens — that is, on the grounds that Saudi courts were better placed to deal with the matter. That decision was reversed by the Appellate Division, which observed that "New York has a compelling interest in the protection of the native banking system from misfeasance or malfeasance". 5

On appeal to the New York Supreme Court, the court reinstated the decision at ?rst instance. The court found that the mere passage of foreign funds through a US bank does not give US courts jurisdiction to hear matters that are otherwise unrelated to the United States.

In response to the Appellate Division's concern for protecting New York's banking system from misfeasance, the New York Supreme Court commented:

Our State's interest in the integrity of its banks is indeed compelling, but it is not signi?cantly threatened every time one foreign national, effecting what is alleged to be a fraudulent transaction, moves dollars through a bank in New York ... New York's interest in its banking system "is not a trump to be played whenever a party to such a transaction seeks to use our courts for a lawsuit with little or no apparent contact with New York". 6

The Supreme Court of New York's decision in Mashreqbank is signi?cant for foreign banks. Had the Appellate Division's decision been left undisturbed, foreign banks would have faced the increased risk of being drawn into costly litigation in the United States in circumstances where they facilitated investment ?ows with the United States.


The decisions in Daimler, Gliklad and Masheqbank are critical for Australian banks with a presence in the United States for a number of reasons. First, as a decision of the US Supreme Court, Daimler carries signi?cant weight, while the New York Supreme Court cases of Gliklad and Mashreqbank, though binding only in New York, are likely to be highly in?uential elsewhere in the United States. Second, the cases make clear that any effort to exercise jurisdiction over an Australian bank in New York simply because it operates in New York, or funds pass through it, is likely to be unsuccessful. Third, and perhaps most crucially, the cases con?rm that Australian banks are safe to rely on the "separate legal entity rule" to refuse requests for documents or applications for the turnover of assets by branches outside the United States which are only served on the bank's presence in the United States.


1 Daimler AG v Bauman No 11-965, 2014 WL 113486 (US 14 January 2014).
2 Gliklad v Bank Hapoalim, BM No 155195/2014 (NY Sup Ct NY Cnty 11 August 2014).
3 Above, n 1, at 17.
4 Mashreqbank PSC v Ahmed Hamad Al Gosaibi & Bros Co No 54 (NY Apr 8, 2014).
5 Mashreqbank PSC v Ahmed Hamad LA Gosaibi & Bros Co 191 AD3d 1 [1st Dept 2012] at 8.
6 Above, n 4, at 7–8.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Most awarded firm and Australian deal of the year
Australasian Legal Business Awards
Employer of Choice for Women
Equal Opportunity for Women
in the Workplace (EOWA)

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.