ARTICLE
22 October 2014

Who pays the costs associated with managing the fund management component of the damages? Gray v Richards [2014] HCA 40

CG
Cooper Grace Ward

Contributor

Established in 1980, Cooper Grace Ward is a leading independent law firm in Brisbane with over 20 partners and 200 team members. They offer a wide range of commercial legal services with a focus on corporate, commercial, property, litigation, insurance, tax, and family law. Their specialized team works across various industries, providing exceptional client service and fostering a strong team culture.
An incapacitated plaintiff can recover from the defendant the costs associated with managing the fund management damages.
Australia Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In 2003, 10 year old Rhiannon Gray sustained a traumatic brain injury in a motor vehicle accident. Due to her injuries, she will require constant care and will remain incapable of managing her own affairs. Through her mother, she commenced legal proceedings and the parties compromised the majority of her claims for $10 million plus an amount of damages, to be assessed at a later date, to cover the expenses associated with managing her lump sum award.

The defendant's negligence was responsible for the plaintiff's inability to manage her lump sum award and therefore, in accordance with the principles in Todorovic v Waller [1981] HCA 72, her damages should include a component for managing the lump sum award (fund management damages).

In Gray's case, there has been significant litigation in relation to fund management issues.

On 15 October 2014, the High Court handed down its decision and held as follows:

  1. The calculation of the cost of managing an incapacitated plaintiff's damages was not a separate exercise from calculating the value of fund management expenses as part of the plaintiff's future outgoings. The expenses in question are not incurred separately from the cost of fund management; they are an integral part of that cost.
  2. Whether the fund management expenses are reasonable is not generally a matter of judicial discretion. The court's concern is to ensure that the plaintiff's actual loss is compensated. If the fund management expense component of the award reflects the actual market conditions and is not contrary to any statutory control then it is an expense that is a consequent of the tortfeasor's negligence and therefore compensable.
  3. An incapacitated plaintiff is entitled to recover from the defendant the costs associated with managing the fund management damages.
  4. An incapacitated plaintiff is not entitled to recover costs associated with managing the predicted future income of the managed fund.

Winner – EOWA Employer of Choice for Women Citation 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012
Winner – ALB Gold Employer of Choice 2011 and 2012
Finalist – ALB Australasian Law Awards 2008, 2010, 2011 and 2012 (Best Brisbane Firm)
Winner – BRW Client Choice Awards 2009 and 2010 - Best Australian Law Firm (revenue less than $50m)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More