Think you've seen someone wearing a burqa? In
Australia? We bet you haven't.
Not convinced? Well, that's not surprising since most
Australians don't actually know what a burqa is.
A burqa is a loose robe and face covering with a mesh grill over
the eyes – usually it's light blue. Since they're
pretty much only worn in Afghanistan, chances are that you
haven't seen one in real life here.
For some reason, the word 'burqa' tends to be associated
with any kind of face veil worn by Muslim women. What you might
have seen is a person wearing a niqab (full-body robe with eyes
exposed) or, more likely, a hijab (headscarf covering the hair,
ears and neck)... both of which aren't burqas.
So, why all the sudden fuss about a piece of clothing that
isn't even worn in Australia?
This isn't a new issue, but its recent revival sparked from
Senator Cory Bernardi's reaction to anti-terrorism raids
carried out in Sydney a few weeks ago. He tweeted:
"Note burqa wearers in some of the houses
raided this morning? This shroud of oppression and flag of
fundamentalism is not right in Aust."
It's true that some of the news footage displayed women
wearing full-body robes but they were niqabs – not burqas.
This was followed by a bunch of other politicians calling for a
ban on the burqa for anyone entering Parliament House and Prime
Minister Tony Abbott chiming in that he found the burqa to be
"a fairly confronting form of attire" and wished it
Extra security measures have now also been announced. The
Speaker of the House of Representatives and President of the Senate
have imposed immediate new rules which prevent all persons with
"facial coverings" from entering the open public
galleries in Parliament. Instead, they're being forced to sit
in glass enclosures. (As we speak, there are noises that Mr Abbott
is going to step in and tell the Speaker to revoke this new rule,
but that could be just more spin. We'll see.)
A blanket ban on the burqa would be contrary to the
Constitution, which explicitly prevents the Commonwealth from
making laws prohibiting the free exercise of any religion. We think
the Parliamentary burqa ban might infringe the Constitution too,
but in any event it is entirely unjustified and unnecessary, and
can fairly be compared to a form of apartheid.
We don't have the right to tell people that they can't
wear a burqa. We have the right not to like it... but then again,
most of us don't even know what it is.
Deputy Labor leader Tanya Plibersek pretty much summed it up
when she said "I'd prefer if Tony Abbott didn't get
about in his Speedos either, but it's a free country". We
We do not disclaim anything about this article. We're
quite proud of it really.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
There has been a range of recent legal developments that affect privacy, child abuse claims and workers compensation.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).