Australia: Adjudication determination under the Construction Contracts Act 2004 as a basis for a statutory demand in WA

Clayton Utz Insights
Last Updated: 8 October 2014
Article by Stephen Boyle

Key Points:

A statutory demand based on an adjudication determination under the Construction Contracts Act 2004 (WA) without a court's leave, is at risk of being set-aside by the court.

On the basis of the recent decision in Kellogg Brown & Root v Doric [2014] WASC 206, there would appear to be a basis for a court to set aside a statutory demand under section 459 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) founded on an adjudication determination under the Construction Contracts Act 2004 (WA), where a court has not first granted leave to enforce the determination under section 43(2) of the Construction Contracts Act.

In resisting an application for enforcement under section 43(2) of the Construction Contracts Act on the ground of jurisdictional error, the test is whether there is an arguable case that the determination is invalid.

The adjudication and the statutory demand

Kellogg Brown and Root ("KBR"), and Doric were parties to a contract under which KBR was required to provide engineering services to Doric on the Jimblebar Iron Ore Project in Western Australia.

Doric, which was the principal under the contract, made claims against its contractor KBR, and two adjudication applications under the Construction Contracts Act in respect of those claims. It was successful in both adjudications.

KBR failed to pay the amounts of the determinations and commenced judicial review proceedings in the West Australian Supreme Court to quash the determinations.

After the judicial review proceedings began, Doric issued a statutory demand to recover the amounts of the determinations from KBR, but did so without having first obtained leave from the court under section 43(2) of the Construction Contracts Act to enforce those determination as judgments.

Kellogg sought to set aside the statutory demand on the basis that:

  • Doric had failed to obtain leave of the court to enforce the determinations pursuant to section 43(2) of the Construction Contracts Act;
  • there was a "genuine dispute" as to the debt for the purposes of section 459H(1)(a) of the Corporations Act: and
  • the determinations were invalid due to jurisdictional error.

The Acting Master held that the statutory demand should be set aside. The decision may be limited in its application to security of payment legislation in Western Australia, where leave to register and enforce a determination must be sought from the court. This is distinguishable from other security of payment legislation in Australia, where an adjudication determination becomes a debt due which may be filed in a court as a judgment.

Leave under section 43(2)

Acting Master Gething concluded that Justice Pullin's comments in Diploma Constructions v KPA Architects [2014] WASCA 91 meant that a determination under the Act can only be enforced by way of the issue of statutory demand if the party issuing the statutory demand had first obtained the leave of the court to enforce the determination pursuant to section 43(2).

In reaching that position, Acting Master Gething analysed the Construction Contracts Act and concluded that section 43(2), in requiring a court to give leave to enforce an adjudication determination, thereby submits that determination to the oversight of the court: Thiess Pty Ltd v MCC Mining (Western Australia) Pty Ltd [2011] WASC 80.

Furthermore, without leave pursuant to section 43(2) of the Construction Contracts Act, the ability to enforce the determination (under the Act or at all) is not enlivened, and therefore issuing a statutory demand would circumvent that regime. This may be grounds for the court to:

  • find that there is "some other reason" under section 459J(1)(b) of the Corporations Act not to enforce a statutory demand; and
  • make an order restraining a party from using the statutory demand procedure on the basis of an abuse of process.

Acting Master Gething went on to consider that if he was incorrect in his interpretation of section 43(2), there would be grounds to set aside the statutory demand under section 459H(1)(a) of the Corporations Act on the basis that there was a "genuine dispute" based on jurisdictional error in the determination. In this regard, he found that there were two levels of dispute that could give rise to a "genuine dispute":

  • the "primary dispute" which went to arguments of competing claims of set-off; and
  • the "secondary dispute" which went to whether or not the determination creating the debt the subject of the statutory demand was invalid due to jurisdictional error.

In relation to the primary dispute, he found that the determination gave rise to a statutory debt that remained due and payable, notwithstanding the existence of set-off claims. Therefore, there was no "genuine dispute" for the purposes of section 459H(1)(a).

In relation to the secondary dispute, he found that where the creditor had failed to obtain leave pursuant to section 43(2) of the Construction Contracts Act, provided that the party on whom the statutory demand had been served could demonstrate a bona fide arguable case for judicial review, there would be sufficient grounds to set aside a statutory demand on the basis of a "genuine dispute" for the purposes of section 459H(1)(a) of the Corporations Act.

On that basis, Acting Master Gething held that Doric's actions were an abuse of process under the head of the secondary dispute because it was effectively using the statutory demand procedure to compel payment of the disputed debt where leave to enforce had not been granted and where there was a bona fide arguable case for judicial review.

He also went on to find that bona fide arguable judicial review proceedings would constitute "some other reason" to set aside a statutory demand for the purposes of section 459J(1)(b) of the Corporations Act.

An arguable case that the determination is invalid

On a separate point, Acting Master Gething (referring to various recent authorities) also considered the implications of raising arguable grounds for judicial review in opposition to an application for leave to enforce an adjudication application under section 43(2) of the Construction Contracts Act. Acting Master Gething appeared to proceed on the basis that, while an arguable case for judicial review would be a reason for refusing the grant of leave to enforce, it would not by itself result in the determination being invalid and that a separate application for judicial review would be required for that outcome.

Similarly, in RNR Contracting Pty Ltd v Highway Constructions Pty Ltd [2013] WASC 423 which involved an application for leave to enforce a determination, the court, despite finding that there was an arguable jurisdictional error, still proceeded to enforce the determination. One of the factors taken into account by the court in that decision was that the defendant had not issued an application for judicial review.

Both of these cases demonstrate a reluctance to find a determination which is arguably afflicted with jurisdictional error, to be invalid. That is inconsistent with Justice Murphy's observation that a determination tainted by jurisdictional error was a nullity: Perrinepod Pty Ltd v Georgiou Building Pty Ltd [2011] WASCA 217; (2011) 43 WAR 319. It is also a shift from Justice Murphy's comments in Perrinepod wherein he held that jurisdictional error could be raised either in opposition to an application for leave to enforce a determination under section 43(2) of the Construction Contracts Act, or by a separate application for judicial review by way of certiorari.

Accordingly, a cautious party seeking to oppose the enforcement of a determination should initiate separate judicial review proceedings in addition to resisting an application for leave to enforce under section 43(2).

Clayton Utz communications are intended to provide commentary and general information. They should not be relied upon as legal advice. Formal legal advice should be sought in particular transactions or on matters of interest arising from this bulletin. Persons listed may not be admitted in all states and territories.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.