Australia: Workplace Relations Reform: Tentative Steps now Likely to Hasten in 2005

Last Updated: 12 April 2005
Article by Anthony Wood

In the immediate post-election period, there was considerable media speculation, fuelled by the comments made by the Prime Minister and senior industry representatives, of the prospect of further workplace relations reform. In the ensuing weeks, the rhetoric has continued. In his speech at the opening of parliament on 16 November 2004, the Governor-General said that '... the government will accelerate the reform of workplace relations as a means of raising productivity and Australian living standards'.

In particular, the government has continued to press the case for the immediate passage of its unfair dismissal reforms in the parliamentary session which commenced on 16 November 2004. The government has also stressed the importance of its legislation to clarify the impact of the High Court's Electrolux decision, as well as the substantially modified right of entry laws.

But what other changes can we expect?

Since Peter Reith's landmark 1996 reforms, the Federal Government has been forced to adopt an approach of piecemeal reform, ostensibly because the Australian Democrats, holding the balance of power in the Senate, had rejected the need for ongoing reform. Largely with the support of the Australian Democrats, a small amount of amending legislation has passed over recent years. Now that the Senate outcome from July 2005 is known, the constraints will be eradicated.

However, this does not mean that legislative reform will wait until midway through next year. The government has already announced its intention to pursue key planks of its election policy notwithstanding a potentially hostile Senate until next July.

In this article we will summarise the changes already proposed by the government for the remaining 2004 sittings. We also speculate on some of the key areas of reform which are likely to follow with the constitution of the new Senate in July 2005. Finally, we also summarise the results of our client survey on the priority areas for reform.

Immediate legislation planned

For some time the government has maintained the importance of its small business unfair dismissal exemption legislation. The Workplace Relations Amendment (Fair Dismissal) Bill 2004 has, in its various forms, been blocked by the Senate 41 times over eight years. And more recently, the government has sought to exempt small business from the obligation to pay severance pay when implementing redundancies.

The four pieces of legislation to be introduced before the summer break are:

  • The Workplace Relations Amendment (Agreement Validation) Bill 2004 . This Bill was introduced by the government on 17 November 2004. Its effect is to validate certified agreements and Australian Workplace Agreements (AWAs) which were certified or approved on or before 2 September 2004, being the date of the High Court's decision in Electrolux. In essence, the Bill seeks to validate those instruments, whilst also ensuring that specific matters contained in agreements or AWAs which do not pertain to the employment relationship are void. After accepting a Democrat amendment designed to validate protected action taken prior to 2 September 2004, the Act was passed on 2 December 2004.
  • The Workplace Relations (Right of Entry) Bill 2004, which was introduced on 2 December 2004 and has been referred to a Senate committee for report on 7 March 2005. The Bill is in response to the Federal Court's decision in BGC to exclude the operation of state right of entry laws where federal right of entry laws also apply. It also specifies that unions must comply with reasonable requests by an employer in relation to where employee/union discussions take place. This is intended to overcome the position established in the AIRC's decision of ANZ v FSU. According to Workplace Relations Minister, Kevin Andrews, the bill 'is certainly not an attempt to stop unions entering the workplace, but it will ensure that stringent criteria be satisfied before anyone is granted a right of entry permit'. (This bill is discussed in greater detail in our separate article in this newsletter.)

These latter two Bills were previously introduced into the Senate in August 2004 where they were blocked. It is most likely that they will face continued opposition in the Senate, at least until the new Senate convenes in mid-2005.

What reform is likely ... or needed?

It is difficult to speculate on the extent to which the government will vigorously pursue reform prior to the new Senate taking effect in July next year. On the one hand, why would the current Senate now agree to pass legislation which has consistently been rejected by it in the past? On the other hand, the Australian Democrats are still a significant force in the Upper House and may be prepared to compromise on certain matters before their influence dissipates entirely. The Democrats spokesperson, Senator Andrew Murray, was a key player in the 1996 Reith reforms and has previously expressed his support for a unitary industrial relations system. Accordingly, the government's plans for a comprehensive review of the duplication that currently exists in Australia's industrial relations system may well receive widespread support in the short to medium term. There is clear scope to use the corporations power to legislate federally in order to overcome the rivalry and forum shopping which now commonly occurs between the six different state and federal systems in Australia.

On any view, there are a number of unsatisfactory aspects of the current industrial relations laws which have resulted in a regime of complexity and over-regulation, which do not deliver any actual or significant benefits to employers or the economy. Realistically, however, a federal takeover of this area will require considerable political will and community support and cannot be expected during the first half of the government's term in office.

As an observer of the current debate on workplace reform it is difficult to conclude the government's commitment to genuine reform, even after July next year. On the one hand, there are clear signals from the government that the bills rejected by the last parliament constitute the significant extent of its current agenda. Conversely, the Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations, Kevin Andrews, has been consulting privately with many employers and industry groups over recent weeks. And it's likely he's being told that much more can be done.

Despite the government's preference to confine its reform agenda to legislation which was previously rejected by the last Parliament, there are strong arguments in favour of a re-write of much of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) (WR Act)—particularly those provisions dealing with enterprise bargaining, transmission of business, freedom of association and unfair dismissal. Another area crying for reform, at least from a business perspective, is section 166A of the WR Act. The section currently grants an effective immunity to unions from having to compensate employers for damages they cause during the first 72 hours of unprotected industrial action.

The task of re-writing the WR Act could simplify the provisions, insert clear statements of principle, clarify the role of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission (AIRC) and address specific problems which have already been identified in case law over the past eight years of the operation of the 1996 reforms. There is surely a case to argue that such a course is to be preferred to piecemeal amendments to the current provisions.

What is business thinking?

When Freehills notified its clients in October this year about some of the likely areas for workplace relations reform, we also asked them to respond to us with their priorities for reform. Some of the key findings of our survey were:

  • approximately half of the respondents considered that the government's proposed exemptions for small business from unfair dismissal laws and redundancy pay was not a priority at all
  • more than 70 per cent of respondents thought that legislation to clarify the validity of certified agreements in light of the Electrolux decision was a high priority, and
  • although reform towards a unitary system was not ranked as the highest priority, more of our clients saw this as a high or medium priority than any other reform proposal.

The top five areas of reform which received high or medium priority ratings in the Freehills survey were, in order of priority:

  • a unitary system
  • compulsory secret ballots before strikes
  • overcoming the Emwest decision (which allows for unions to take protected industrial action during the life of an existing certified agreement)
  • limit the scope of matters which can be included in enterprise agreements, and
  • validation of certified agreements post-Electrolux.

Of course, these results are just a guide to what business is thinking. Moreover, they are skewed because most of the respondents fall within the medium to large business categories. Accordingly, a survey of smaller employers may well indicate different priorities. Nevertheless, it is possible to glean a clear preference for significant reform which, had the current Senate composition remained unchanged, would have been extremely unlikely to be on the political radar.

Previous rejected legislation

If the government considers that a fundamental revision and re-write of the WR Act is not desirable, employers can at least expect them to pursue most of the reforms rejected by the last Parliament. The key elements of this will involve:

  • allowing collective agreements to last for five years instead of three
  • protecting the status of independent contractors as a legitimate alternative to the employment relationship
  • requiring unions to apply to conduct a secret ballot of employees before being able to take 'protected action' in enterprise bargaining negotiations
  • streamlining and simplifying the AWA procedures
  • amending the objects of the WR Act to ensure that the primary focus of the award safety net is to address the needs of the low paid
  • further reduce the number of allowable award matters by removing matters such as skill-based career paths, bonuses, long service leave, notice of termination and jury service. In addition, specify in the WR Act matters which are specifically non-allowable matters, including transfers between locations or from different types of employment, accident make up pay and minimum or maximum hours required for part-time employees
  • outlawing 'pattern bargaining' and enabling the AIRC to suspend a bargaining period to allow for a 'cooling off' period where protected action is occurring
  • banning all industrial action, regardless of purpose, during the life of a certified agreement
  • expanding the circumstances in which the parties may seek to terminate a bargaining period
  • creating a separate arm of the AIRC specialising in voluntary mediation of disputes.

Whether workplace relations reform continues to be piecemeal or comprehensive, it is almost certain that the bargaining landscape will change dramatically over the next one to two years.

A version of this article was published in the Human Resources magazine, 30 November 2004.

Tony Wood is a partner in the Freehills employee relations group, based in Melbourne.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.