The US city of Los Angeles filed a lawsuit on Friday accusing
JPMorgan Chase & Co. of channelling minority borrowers into
risky home loans, according to the Los Angeles Times.
In a lawsuit filed last Friday in the US District Court, the Los
Angeles city attorney alleged the nation's largest bank
"has engaged in a continuous pattern and practice of mortgage
discrimination in Los Angeles since at least 2004 by imposing
different terms or conditions on a discriminatory and legally
prohibited basis", the US paper reported.
Rockwell Olivier's Sydney principal Chris Kintis, who
specialises in commercial dispute resolution, said the case
provides lessons for government authorities in Australia when
examining the conduct of third parties to see if action could be
"I think the larger litigation is well and truly in
Australia and has been for some time now," Mr Kintis said.
"Locally, what we have seen for a number of years is closer
scrutiny of losses and, looking outside of mortgages, I think the
shareholder class actions are examples of close scrutiny of
transactions, comments, statements, and what's not said to the
marketplace," he said.
"The availability of funding is a key driver to those large
claims being prosecuted."
The Los Angeles Times noted that the lawsuit is the latest in a
city attempt to collect unspecified damages based on hits to city
revenue from alleged discriminatory lending.
In a statement, JPMorgan vowed to "vigorously defend"
itself against the city's lawsuit filed on Friday.
"The facts don't support their claims and are
contradicted by our demonstrated commitment to minorities in the
Los Angeles area," JPMorgan spokesperson Jason Lobo said in a
"We are disappointed the LA City Attorney is pursuing an
adversarial approach to address city finances impacted by the
recent economic downturn," Mr Lobo said, adding that the
downturn "was beyond our control".
The JPMorgan suit cites a report from low-income advocacy groups
that claimed the mortgage crisis resulted in 200,000 foreclosures
in Los Angeles from 2008 through to 2012, a wave that depressed
property values, and in turn, city property tax revenue by $481
million, according to the report.
Rockwell Olivier's Mr Kintis said it was unusual for a
government authority to take what almost appears to be
"It will be a complicated argument on losses and
causation," he said.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
While the use of cash settled equity swaps is an established part of the Australian securities market, their use in recent high profile takeovers in Australia has attracted much attention. In particular, this attention has focused on the use of swaps by bidders or potential bidders in target companies without disclosure.
An AFSL is required if a person carries on a financial services business in Australia, unless an exemption applies.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).