Australia: Back to the future: the 'Newtronics' decision and the liquidator's lien for remuneration

Last Updated: 12 May 2014
Article by Justin Kang
Focus: James Stewart in his capacity as Liquidator of Newtronics Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) v Atco Controls Pty Limited (in Liquidation) [2014] HCA 15
Services: Commercial, Dispute Resolution & Litigation, Financial Services
Industry Focus: Financial Services

Much of our world has changed since 1933. Technology has moved forward exponentially. Commercial space travel is no longer a pipe dream. The Australian cricket captain now wears an earring. In many ways, society is unrecognisable to how it was.

But for those overwhelmed by constant change, there is still comfort to be had in the familiar and the constant. We all still love the Queen. The Rolling Stones still fill stadiums. Every twenty or so years, Godzilla reappears in our cinemas. And the High Court this week in James Stewart in his capacity as Liquidator of Newtronics Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) v Atco Controls Pty Limited (in Liquidation) [1] (Newtronics decision) reaffirmed its decision in 1933 of In re Universal Distributing Co Ltd (In Liq) [2] (Universal).

The principle in Universal

What Universal decided was that a secured creditor of an insolvent company cannot claim the benefit of a fund realised by the liquidator in the winding up, without the liquidator's costs and expenses in realising that fund first being deducted. A liquidator's right to payment of his costs and expenses ahead of a secured creditor has been characterised as an equitable lien that attaches to the fund in question.

The same or similar rule (sometimes referred to as the salvage principle) applies not only to liquidators but also court-appointed receivers and other persons whose efforts lead to the recovery and realisation of property that is otherwise subject to a specific charge in favour of another party.

As stated, the principle appears irrefutably fair and unremarkable. How could a secured creditor, who stands to benefit from a fund created by someone else's efforts, reasonably object to the payment of that person's costs and expenses out of that fund? After all, the secured creditor would otherwise have incurred costs and expenses itself if it had had to create the fund.

The facts in the Newtronics decision

Something else that has not changed since 1933 is the potential for commercial disputes and fallout from an insolvent winding up.

Newtronics Pty Limited (Newtronics) was a wholly owned subsidiary of Atco Controls Pty Limited (Atco), and had granted a charge over its assets to Atco in exchange for Atco's financial support.

In January 2002, Atco enforced its charge by appointing receivers to Newtronics. The following month, Newtronics was wound up and a liquidator was appointed.

The liquidator then brought proceedings against Atco and the receivers, challenging the validity of Atco's charge and the receivers' appointment. The liquidator was funded in bringing that action by another creditor of Newtronics, Seeley International Pty Ltd (Seeley).

The receivers settled the action with the liquidation by paying the liquidator an agreed sum of $1.25 million, but the liquidator continued and ultimately lost his claim against Atco. With the validity of its charge confirmed, Atco then demanded the settlement fund of $1.25 million paid by the receivers to the liquidator. The liquidator refused on the basis he was entitled to payment of his costs of the litigation out of that fund first.

Atco sued the liquidator for the fund in the Victorian Supreme Court, but was unsuccessful at first instance. Atco then appealed to the Victorian Court of Appeal which overturned the first instance decision and found in favour of Atco.

The liquidator then appealed to the High Court. In a unanimous judgment handed down on 7 May 2014, the High Court overturned the Victorian Court of Appeal decision and confirmed that the liquidator had an equitable lien for payment of his costs out of the fund ranking ahead of Atco' charge.

Reasoning in the Victorian Court of Appeal decision

The Court of Appeal did not (indeed could not) find against the principle in Universal of a liquidator's equitable lien. Rather the Court found that circumstances in Newtronics meant the case was different and could be distinguished from Universal.

The pivotal finding was that the liquidator's actions in realising the settlement sum were not taken for the benefit of Atco, but rather for the benefit of Seeley. Indeed the liquidator had been acting directly against Atco as the litigation which had produced the settlement sum involved a challenge to the validity of Atco's charge. As such, the situation was not one where Atco would otherwise have incurred costs in realising the settlement fund itself.

On this basis, the Court concluded that Atco would not be acting unconscientiously in claiming the settlement sumfree of the liquidator's costs.

Arguably an analogous finding was made by the NSW Supreme Court in Akki Pty Ltd v Martin Hall Pty Ltd And Anor [3] (interestingly a case not referred to in the Newtronics decision). Akki Pty Ltd (Akki) was owed money under a charge over Martin Hall Pty Limited (MH). MH had obtained a costs award against Akki that Akki claimed it could set off against the money it was owed. The solicitor who had acted for MH in obtaining that costs award, however, claimed a lien for his own fees ahead of MH's right of set off. The Court dismissed the solicitor's claim on the basis that his work in obtaining the costs award had not benefitted, but involved him acting directly against, the party (Akki) who held the charge.

The High Court's decision

In overturning the Victorian Court of Appeal's decision, the High Court found that:

  1. The principle in Universal, or an equitable lien, applies to remuneration owed to a liquidator for work that results in the realisation of money as funds in the winding up.
  2. The fact that the work in question may not have benefitted or been requested by the secured creditor does not affect whether the lien applies.
  3. A liquidator's duty is owed to the body of creditors as a whole, and it is no part of that duty to ensure that litigation undertaken by the liquidator in the course of realising assets is for the benefit of a secured creditor or any particular creditor.
  4. The fact that the liquidator's actions in Newtronics were in Seeley's interests (and adverse to Atco's interests) did not affect the question of whether an equitable lien arose.
  5. The relevant benefit is the realisation of funds available for distribution in the winding up.
  6. The fact that the liquidator was indemnified for his costs by Seeley did not negate the lien as the liquidator, under his funding agreement, was obliged to reimburse Seeley out of the settlement fund.

In summary, Atco was claiming a fund which had cost the liquidator money to create. The fact that Atco had not wanted the liquidator to create that fund did not prevent the liquidator recouping his costs from the fund before any payment was made to Atco.


An interesting aspect of the debate in Newtronics concerned whether it was unconscientious for Atco to claim the settlement sum free of the liquidator's costs in creating that fund. Although there was no suggestion that the liquidator had acted improperly in creating the fund, the test is not phrased as one of unconscientiousness by the liquidator, but rather the secured creditor.

However, the High Court's decision confirms that a secured creditor cannot defeat a liquidator's lien simply because the liquidator's actions in creating the relevant fund were adverse to the secured creditor's interests. In what circumstances then could a secured creditor claim a fund ahead of a claim by the liquidator for their costs in creating that fund?

Possibly the only situation where a secured creditor might successfully challenge a liquidator's lien is where the conduct of the liquidator is somehow found wanting. One scenario might be where the liquidator incurs costs grossly disproportionate to the scale of the dispute or the fund ultimately realised.

Also underlying part of the dispute in Newtronics was a contest of interests between Atco and Seeley. In certain other cases where a liquidator has been funded by one creditor to take action against another creditor, the liquidator faces charges of bias and an application for removal by that other creditor (this was not the case with Newtronics' liquidator who had prudently obtained Federal Court approval for his funding agreement with Seeley). However those cases have not always been successful.

Secured and indeed other creditors are entitled to examine whether a liquidator's actions that directly affect them are appropriate. Possible remedies for a creditor aggrieved by a liquidator's actions (short of the more drastic step of seeking the liquidator's removal) include applying to the Court under section 1321 of the Corporations Act to review a specific decision taken by the liquidator.

For liquidators, the fact remains that many actions taken in accordance with their duties will be unpalatable to specific creditors. In considering whether to take steps that may prove controversial, liquidators should obtain appropriate advice and in some situations perhaps seek the protection of judicial advice under section 479(3) of the Corporations Act. Ultimately though a liquidator doing their job cannot please everyone. That much hasn't changed since 1933.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.