Australia: Land valuations: the role of the weighting when relying on "far from perfect" comparable sales

Recently, the NSW Land and Environment Court handed down its decision in Marrickville Council v Sydney Water Corporation [2013] NSWLEC 222. The judgment is interesting because the Court applied a weighting to the comparable sales to reflect their reliability following significant adjustments made to those sales and no conclusive evidence of market value being derived.


On 11 November 2011, Sydney Water Corporation (SWC) compulsorily acquired three easements over open space land owned by Marrickville Council (Council) for the purpose of the Sydney Water Act 1994 (NSW) (SW Act). SWC utilised the acquired easements to construct a water supply pipeline (Pipeline) from the desalination plant at Kurnell to the Sydney water distribution facility at Erskineville.

The land over which the acquired easements are situated had an irregular "U" shape and an area of 8.268 hectares comprising the following three distinct areas (Land):

  1. generally level area beside the Alexandra Canal (being the area affected by the acquired easements);
  2. a steeply rising vegetated area leading to an elevated level area; and
  3. a western wetlands area.

The acquired easements were each 8 metres wide and have a total area of 4,379 square metres (Affected Land). The terms of the easements:

  1. were expressed to be for water supply purposes and permit above ground infrastructure;
  2. provided the Council with a right to permanent vehicular and pedestrian access alongside the works carried out by SWC; and
  3. did not limit future works to what is currently on the land (i.e. the water supply pipeline).

The Council claimed total compensation in the amount of $2,589,460, while SWC contended for total compensation in the amount of $471,700.


Valuation methodology

The parties' valuers agreed (and the Court accepted) the following:

  • for the purpose of s 56(1)(a) of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (NSW) (Just Terms Act), it is appropriate to assume that the acquiring authority will use the easement to the maximum extent permitted by the terms of the easement;
  • the highest and best use of the Affected Land was as public open space, particularly having regard to topographic constraints (landfill batter-slope), proximity to the heritage listed Alexandra Canal, flood liability, former contamination and aircraft noise constraints;
  • due to the large size of the Land relative to the Affected Land, the before and after valuation approach would not accurately identify any decrease in the market value of the Land; and
  • the most appropriate valuation methodology is the piecemeal method.

Land size and the piecemeal approach

In applying the piecemeal valuation method, the Council's valuer formed the view that the assessment of market value was to be undertaken by reference to the Affected Land rather than the entirety of the Land. The latter circumstance would likely have resulted in a lower rate per square metre than the former on account of its larger size. On the other hand, SWC submitted that the Council's valuer should have applied a discount to account for the larger size of the Land compared to the Affected Land.

Comparable sales analysis

In respect of comparable sales, the parties' valuers relied upon the following evidence:

  • The Council's valuer relied upon the sales of two residential properties abutting the Land that had an underlying residential zoning and were acquired for an open space purpose. Based on these sales, the Council's valuer adopted adjusted square metre rates of $800 for the level sections of the Affected Land (applying a 20 per cent discount for the smaller size of the residential sites) and $600 for the sloping batter area of the Affected Land (applying an additional 20 per cent discount for the topography); and
  • SWC's valuer relied upon the sale by Sydney Airport Corporation Ltd (SAC) to SWC of an easement for the continuation of Pipeline on land adjoining the Affected Land to the north (SAC Land) at a rate of $125 per square metre. SWC's valuer adopted this rate without adjustment because, in his opinion, the terms of the easement on the SAC Land were virtually identical to the terms of the acquired easements and the SAC Land had a number of the same physical constraints as the Affected Land.

The key issues for determination by the Court were whether residential sales should be considered and, if so, whether a discount should be applied for their underlying residential zoning and the particular features of the Affected Land.


Ultimately, Biscoe J endorsed the approach of the Council's valuer and confirmed that, when applying the piecemeal approach, it was appropriate to value the Affected Land and correct not to make a discount for the larger size of the Land (citing Penrith City Council v Sydney Water Corporation [2009] NSWLEC 2 at [10]-[13]). However, His Honour noted that different considerations may apply if the valuers had adopted the "before" and "after" valuation method of valuation.

The Court accepted that it is legitimate to consider residential sales evidence to derive open space land values in circumstances where there is a shortage of needed open space in a locality and that no discount should be applied to comparable residential sales merely because the acquired land is zoned for open space (citing Leichhardt Council v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales (No 3) [2009] NSWLEC 3 at [22], [25] and [33]-[34]). However, the comparable residential sales must be adjusted for factors such as location, topography and environmental features (citing Leichhardt Council v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales [2005] NSWLEC 86)

The Court also accepted that:

  1. the Marrickville local government area was deficient in public open space having regard to the Plan of Management Tempe Recreation Reserve 1997 and the Department of Planning's 2003 open space inventory; and
  2. in 2005 and 2006, the Council paid residential rates to purchase two properties with an underlying residential zoning for open space purposes, namely the residential sales relied upon by the Council's valuer.

Although Biscoe J accepted that the sales relied upon by the parties' valuers provided "some indication of value", they were considered to be "far from perfect" comparable transactions. In the circumstances, the Court applied further adjustments to the comparable sales relied upon by both valuers, which narrowed the difference between the parties' valuation evidence.

In respect of the residential comparables, Biscoe J derived per square metre rates of $550 for the level land (after a downward adjustment of 45 per cent) and $375 for the sloping batter area (after a downward adjustment of 63 per cent). In deriving these rates, the Court applied downward adjustments for the availability of utility services, flood affectation, aircraft noise environmental issues and controlled airspace height limitation, and an upward adjustment for view.

As for the sale of the SAC Land, His Honour derived per square metre rates of $419 for the level land (after an upward adjustment of 235 per cent) and $397 for the sloping batter area (after an upward adjustment of 217.5 per cent). In determining these rates, the Court applied upward adjustments for flood affectation, aircraft noise, road access, environmental issues, controlled airspace height limitation and onerous easement conditions, and a downward adjustment for topography.

After adopting rates derived from the comparables, the Court considered it necessary to apply a weighting to each sale to reflect its reliability. Biscoe J considered that the rate derived from the residential sales should carry a weighting of 60 percent, and the rate derived from the sale of the SAC Land a weighting of 40 percent, having regard to the latter sale requiring the highest percentage adjustments. This weighting appears to be based on His Honour's finding that the sale of the SAC Land was the "most subjective" due to percentage adjustments required to account for the development height restriction, aircraft noise, environmental issues and the onerous easement conditions. Consequently, the Court determined a rate of $497.60 for the level land and $383.80 for the sloping batter area. In total, the Court determined compensation in the amount of $1.634 million for the acquired interests.


This decision is important because it reiterates that the Court will consider residential sales in determining open space values where there is a shortage of open space in the relevant locality (as will often be the case in inner city localities) and will not apply a discount to such sales.

The facts of this case are quite extraordinary in that the comparable sales required downward adjustments of up to 63 per cent and upward adjustments of up to 235 per cent, as there was no truly comparable sales evidence available. Further, despite these significant adjustments, it was still necessary for the Court to apply a weighting to the sales to assess their reliability. This weighting exercise is based on the Court's best assessment of the reliability of the comparable sales, following a review of the features of those sales as compared to the acquired land.


While the adoption of a weighting to comparable sales is a fairly rare phenomenon, it is not without precedent (for instance, see Maurici v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2005] NSWLEC 20; Babcock v Brown Properties Pty Ltd v Valuer-General [2005] NSWLEC 526 (Babcock); and Sharsay Pty Ltd v Valuer-General [2013] NSWLEC 181). A weighting to the reliability of comparable sales may be applied where no single sale can be said to be entirely comparable to the particular acquired land.

The commentary in the American textbook, The Appraisal of Real Estate (12th ed., 2001) published by the Appraisal Institute, adopted by the Court in Babcock (at [63]) provides a useful exploration of the weighting exercise:

When many adjustments are applied by the appraiser and when their individual and collective amounts are substantial, the appraiser must ask, "Is the comparable property really comparable?" The greater the amount of collective adjustment, the more the appraiser may reduce the weight placed on a given comparable, or the appraiser may determine that it is not sufficiently comparable to be used at all. [pp 458-459]...
Re-examining an appraisal helps ensure its accuracy, its consistency, and the logic of leading to the value indications. An appraiser relies more on professional experience and judgment in reconciliation than in any other part of the valuation process. The appraiser weighs the relative significance, applicability, and defensibility of each value indication and relies most heavily on the approach that is most appropriate to the nature of the appraisal problem. [p 600]

The appropriate valuation methodology for open space sales has been the subject of some contention in recent case law. Where there is a lack of truly comparable sales evidence, it seems likely that a weighting will be applied to determine the reliability of a comparable sale. The question that arises for determination at a later date is whether a weighting can or should be applied to a comparable sale that is adjusted by more than 50, 100 or 200 per cent? Adjustments of this quantum to a comparable sale in the ordinary course would call into question the true comparability of that sale.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Most awarded firm and Australian deal of the year
Australasian Legal Business Awards
Employer of Choice for Women
Equal Opportunity for Women
in the Workplace (EOWA)

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.