Australia: Two–Nil: RACV wins against Unisys again!

Last Updated: 7 June 2004
Article by Irene Zeitler

In late 2001 we reported the decision of Justice Hansen in the Supreme Court of Victoria on a claim by RACV Insurance Pty Ltd (RACVI) and RACV Group Services Pty Ltd (RACVGS) against Unisys Australia Limited (Unisys) in respect of a failed IT project for the design, supply and installation of a work flow management system based on the imaging of documents (WMS System).

The WMS System was intended to replace RACVI's existing paper-based system for the processing of claims. The system delivered by Unisys in March 1995 failed in operation and was soon decommissioned. Although Unisys attempted to fix the problems, it was unsuccessful and in June 1996 RACVI terminated its contract with Unisys.

Justice Hansen found in favour of RACVI and RACVGS (collectively RACV) and awarded damages in the order of $4 million for expense wasted on the contract.

Unisys appealed the decision of Justice Hansen and on 14 May 2004, the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Victoria unanimously dismissed the appeal.

Decision of Justice Hansen

At first instance, Justice Hansen held that RACV was entitled to succeed on the basis of three key and untrue representations by Unisys which his Honour held constituted misleading and deceptive conduct in breach of section 52 of the Trade Practices Act.

The three key representations were as follows:

  • the Unisys proposal would if implemented provide adequate storage capacity to provide, on a 'date forward' basis, for all open claims on-line, all claims near-line for three months following closure, and closed claims older than three months off-line
  • high speed image access would be available in a WMS System for on-line claims with an expected response time in the vicinity of 2-4 seconds, and
  • image access would be available in a WMS System for near-line claims with an expected response time in the vicinity of 20 seconds maximum.

The representations had been made before RACVI had entered into the contract for the WMS System with Unisys and his Honour accepted that they had been relied upon by RACV. His Honour further held that insofar as the representations were as to future matters, Unisys had no reasonable grounds for making them.

Appeal to the Full Court

On appeal, Unisys unsuccessfully and much to the annoyance of Acting Justice Phillips who delivered the lead judgment (the other two judges concurred) challenged nearly every step of Justice Hansen's reasoning and on occasion his Honour's primary findings of fact.

Some of the more interesting arguments put by Unisys included the following:

  • the WMS System could have been, if implemented in June 1996 when RACVI terminated its contract with Unisys, made to work. Further, the losses suffered by RACV could have been avoided by taking some relatively simple steps such as adding more cache at a cost of less than $40,000 – Acting Justice Phillips held that while it was true that Unisys had fixed some of the errors, there were still many problems of functionality remaining. His Honour was satisfied that it remained unclear when and how these problems would be fixed. RACVI had already been more than patient in giving Unisys an extension of time and had thus acted reasonably in terminating the contract
  • the correctness or reasonableness of the representations made pre-contract signing could not be fairly judged by reference to events in June 1996, if only because of numerous design changes made to the WMS System in the intervening period, including in particular a change from single image retrieval to retrieval by folders (this argument was also rejected by Acting Justice Phillips). Unisys had failed to show a relevant connection between the representations and the changes made
  • the representations had been qualified or withdrawn by Unisys. By way of support, Unisys referred to certain clauses in the response to the Request for Proposal and in the contract. In the response, Unisys had stated it was unable to commit to response times. The trial judge had held that this qualification was properly a reference to response time to service calls and not response times to the retrieval of image. Unisys further argued that the contract annexed a Project Management Plan (PMP) of some 42 pages. Unisys argued that any representation in respect of open claims being on-line or as to their retrieval times were withdrawn in point 12 on page 7 of the PMP. Point 12 was simply 'Performance Objectives' under a heading 'Major Gaps Identified'. The trial judge held point 12 did not amount to an express qualification or withdrawal of the representation earlier made. Acting Justice Phillips endorsed all of Justice Hansen's findings. With respect to the argument put by Unisys on the PMP, his Honour held that the words in the contract were vague and imprecise and insufficient to constitute a withdrawal or qualification of representations made by Unisys.

Cross appeal

For the purposes of the appeal, RACV had lodged a cross claim. One of the key claims of the cross claim was that given the time taken by the failed project, RACV had spent a good deal on staff labour which, in the end, was altogether wasted. RACV, because of the complexity of the project, had directed some of its more experienced staff to spend time on the project. In order to cover their absence from normal duties, RACV had engaged additional staff. RACV claimed it was entitled to the cost of either wasted time spent by permanent staff or the cost of additional staff.

At first instance, Justice Hansen had rejected the claim for the cost of additional staff because he was not satisfied in relation to the costs involved. He also refused to allow the claim for $350,000 spent on permanent staff. It was in relation to this latter point that RACV succeeded in its cross claim. Acting Justice Phillips held that these costs were incurred in taking steps which were required because of the misconduct basing the cause of action and were thus fully recoverable by RACV.

Commentary on the Full Court decision

Most of Acting Justice Phillips' judgment involves the review of the facts and an analysis of the trial judge's reasoning with which his Honour overwhelmingly concurred.

While the RACV case is not notable for the law it creates, it is a most extraordinary case. Proceedings were filed by RACV in December 1996 and have thus far taken eight years. The cost and executive time involved in the litigation would undoubtedly have been substantial. Twenty-two witnesses were called at the trial. The Court Book's alone comprised 49 lever arch files.

Given this context, his Honour's comments on Unisys' conduct of the litigation are telling and highlight the perils of an IT supplier doggedly persisting with the defence of litigation taken by an equally determined customer.

First, it is clear that Acting Justice Phillips was in no doubt that Unisys had comprehensively and deservedly lost at trial. His Honour expressed surprise that Unisys 'with a significant worldwide reputation' was prepared to put that reputation on the line, not only during a long trial but also during the appeal which lasted some 10 days.

His Honour also castigated Unisys for its last minute concession that it had failed to perform contractually when it was patently clear to his Honour that the system was a failure. (Up until the earlier stages of the trial, Unisys had maintained in its pleadings that it had not failed to deliver a working system by March 1995.)

His Honour further commented that the denials and stand taken by Unisys on some points of the trial did little to confine the argument sensibly and much too extend it without sufficient warrant. As a consequence, his Honour indicated that he would be willing to consider a submission that Unisys should pay RACV's business costs over and above the usual party/party costs.

While the motives of Unisys' appealing seem questionable, what is clear is that Unisys has had a resounding knockback from the Full Court. Not only has Unisys been severely criticised by the Full Court but it has also been ordered to pay an additional $350,000 in damages and further faces the prospect of paying a greater proportion of RACV's legal costs than would otherwise be the norm.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.