Australia: Costs in the Queensland Planning and Environment Court – Recent decisions made under the new cost powers

HG Alert: 16 September 2013
Last Updated: 17 September 2013
Article by James Ireland and Robyn Lamb

Amendments to the Planning and Environment Court's (Court) cost powers in Section 457 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (SPA) commenced on 22 November 2012. Since their introduction, the Court has made some decisions in respect of Section 457 which illustrate the Court's new cost powers.

The previous cost power

Prior to the amendment of the cost powers in the SPA, parties in the Court generally bore their own costs which was, for many parties, one of the attractive features of litigating in the Court. For many local residents, community groups and environmental groups, this was a factor and an incentive to participate in the judicial process without fearing an adverse costs order as is the case in other courts where costs generally follow the event (e.g. the Supreme Court).

While the Court had the discretion to award costs, such as in relation to frivolous and vexatious litigants, the circumstances in which it could do so were considerably narrower than the cost powers now contained in Section 457 and, in practice, costs were rarely ordered against a party.

The new cost powers

The Explanatory Notes to the amendments to the SPA identified a number of "unsatisfactory outcomes" which included commercial competitors using the Court to delay development in the knowledge that they will not be penalised with costs yet achieve a desirable outcome, and third parties litigating on weak town planning grounds in relation to approved developments but which did not fall within the "frivolous or vexatious" category.

Under the new cost powers, the costs of a proceeding (or part of a proceeding or an application in a proceeding) are a discretionary matter for the Court and there is a range of matters to which the Court may have regard in making an order for costs. These matters now include, amongst others:

  • The relative success of the parties.
  • Commercial interests of the parties.
  • Whether the proceeding was commenced or participated in for an improper purpose.
  • Whether the proceeding was commenced or participated in without reasonable prospects of success.
  • Where the Court decides that a decision in relation to a development application conflicts with a relevant instrument (e.g. a regional plan), whether the conflict rules have been satisfied (e.g. there are sufficient grounds to justify the decision despite the conflict).
  • Certain changes to an application during an appeal by an appellant or submitter.
  • Where the proceeding involves an issue that affects (or may affect) a matter of public interest.
  • Whether a party has acted unreasonably leading up to a proceeding (e.g. not giving all the information reasonably requested by way of an information request before a decision of a development application was made).
  • Certain unreasonable conduct in a proceeding (e.g. whether a party should have taken a more active part in a proceeding and did not do so).

Section 457 has also been amended so that subsection (4) provides, in summary, that despite the Court's power to award costs in Section 457(1), the parties bear their own costs of a proceeding (unless the Court orders otherwise) where parties participate early in a dispute resolution process under the Court rules' ADR provisions and the proceeding is resolved during that process or shortly after it has been finalised.

Recent cases on the new cost powers

Since the commencement of the amended cost powers in the SPA, there have been some cases which illustrate the application of the new terms of Section 457.

Cleveland Power Pty Ltd v Redlands City Council & Anor [2013] QPEC 17

The Court's recent decision in Cleveland Power considered an application for cost orders against Birkdale Progress Association Inc (Association). Cleveland Power had obtained a development approval during an earlier appeal and then sought to make a permissible change to the approval. Even though the Association had not been a party to the earlier appeal, it sought to join the proceedings.

The Court noted that the Association's material indicated that it opposed the development approval and that its position was that the development should not have been approved. The Court dismissed the Association's application to join the permissible change proceedings.

The Court thought it significant that the rule in the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 that costs ordinarily follow the event was not adopted in Section 457 of the SPA "...notwithstanding the material widening of the discretion of this court to award costs...". It also noted that the purpose of costs orders is to compensate, not punish parties.

It was accepted by the Court that the Association had acted in the best interests of its members and probably others in the community, and had no commercial interest in the proceedings. However these matters were not determinative of the costs issue.

The Court found it clear that the Association's motive was to "...have the project derailed entirely..." rather than being concerned about the application to make permissible changes to the approval.

The Court concluded that the Association's application to be joined to the permissible change proceeding had no reasonable prospects of success and was for an improper purpose. The Association was ordered to pay Cleveland Power's costs of the application.

MC Property Investments Pty Ltd v Sunshine Coast Regional Council [2013] QPEC 39

In this case, the Council sought costs on the basis that an application about whether a plan was "generally in accordance with" earlier plans and a pre-existing lawful use had failed completely, had no reasonable prospects of success and was to benefit commercial interests.

The Court noted that Section 457 of the SPA shifts responsibility for costs from the previous situation where each party bore their own costs, towards the civil rules that costs ordinarily follow the event. It was noted that the new cost powers have been described as a "middle ground" between the former SPA and the civil rules.

It was argued that the application was made to avoid significant costs associated with obtaining a fresh development approval, which was to benefit commercial interests. The Court noted that the Explanatory Notes indicate that the commercial interests of the parties is "most likely" intended to target commercial competitors of a developer who has been granted a permit. However, the Court declined to finally conclude this point.

The earlier judgment of the Court had concluded that the application for declarations had no reasonable prospects of success and was wholly unsuccessful. It was noted that the applicant had failed to establish any pre-existing lawful use rights and failed completely in an argument about whether a plan was "generally in accordance" with earlier plans. The Court noted that the application was "wholly unsuccessful" and that, for reasons set out in the Court's earlier judgment, the application had no reasonable prospects of success.

The applicant was therefore ordered to pay the Council's costs of and incidental to the proceeding, including the costs application.

Hoffie v Brisbane City Council & Anor [2013] QPEC 41

This decision concerns a submitter appeal against a decision by Council to approve a development for certain material changes of use and reconfiguration of a lot.

During the proceeding, the Court had ordered the parties to attend a mediation which resulted in the parties reaching an agreement that the appeal be allowed on the basis that the co-respondent would provide amended plans to the Council in order to finalise the conditions package. The co-respondent did not provide any amended plans and subsequently advised that it did not wish to proceed with the development application. The appellants sought costs on the basis that the co-respondent had acted unreasonably in its conduct of the proceeding.

In respect of the relative success of the appeal, the Court noted that the appellant's appeal would be allowed so they "...essentially got what they set out to obtain". The Court rejected an argument by the co-respondent that the Court had not determined the merits of the appeal as the merits were determined by a mediation agreement and that:

"It is implicit in that event that the parties' appreciation of the merits of each of their cases was compromised by agreement to achieve a settlement of the proceeding. That is as much a merit determination as is a judgment of the Court'.

Alternatively, the Court considered the co-respondent's decision to not proceed with the development application was "surrender" to the appellants.

In considering Section 457(4) of the SPA, the Court noted that the section refers to an agreement which remains on foot and continues or determines a development application. It found that Section 457(4) did not apply as the co-respondent had abandoned the mediation agreement and the appeal was resolved in a way not contemplated by the mediation agreement.

The final ground on which the appellants sought costs was the co-respondent's unreasonable conduct. The Court referred to the Court rules which express "...the overriding obligation of parties and the Court in facilitating resolution of proceedings". It was noted that the co-respondent did not comply with the mediation agreement and did not advise of its position until subsequent Court reviews. The appellants had participated in the mediation in good faith and had incurred costs, including those of an expert.

The Court inferred from the co-respondent's correspondence that it had not participated in the mediation in good faith and found that it had acted unreasonably. It stated that:

"The appellants have incurred costs that could have been avoided, or at least mitigated, had the true position of the co-respondent been made known and if the co-respondent had proceeded bona fide at the mediation".

Given the chronology of events and their effect on the proceedings, the Court awarded costs in favour of the appellants and noted that costs of only the latter part of the proceeding would not be just or appropriate.

Points for parties litigating in the Court

Parties who litigate in the Court need to be aware that the general rule is no longer that parties bear their own costs. It is apparent from the recent cases that:

  • The Court will closely examine the conduct of parties during a proceeding;
  • A proceeding in the Court must have real prospects of success and not be for an improper purpose;
  • Parties must ensure that they are satisfied with a mediation agreement before signing it, as an attempt to resile from such an agreement may have cost consequences (in addition to other possible enforcement options);
  • Parties must not act unreasonably during proceedings; and
  • Once proceedings have been commenced, parties should participate early in mediation under the Court rules and do so in good faith and on proper authority (which is already a matter prescribed by the Court rules).

We will follow with interest the Court's decisions in relation to the new cost powers as there are still many judicially unexamined aspects of Section 457.

© HopgoodGanim Lawyers

Award-winning law firm HopgoodGanim offers commercially-focused advice, coupled with reliable and responsive service, to clients throughout Australia and across international borders.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.