Australia: Class Actions in Australia

Originally published in Asian Counsel, April 2004

Fifteen years ago the concept of a class action was foreign to Australian law. However, in 1992 the Federal government introduced a modern class action procedure. Since then the class action has become a regular feature of the Australian litigation landscape. Perhaps more importantly, the procedure is increasingly being used for "blockbuster" litigation - that is high profile, publicity-driven actions which seek to advance the claims of hundreds or thousands of claimants.

In simple terms a "class action" is a procedure which allows an individual or a small group of claimants to commence litigation not only on their own account, but also on behalf of a group of people with similar claims. This capacity to mobilise the claims of tens, hundreds, thousands or even millions of claims in a single procedure has meant that, in jurisdictions where the procedure is available, class actions are a favourite area for speculative, lawyer-driven litigation.

Class actions are difficult beasts to manage and their defence is a specialist skill. On the one hand, being named as a defendant in a class action can be a daunting prospect. A defendant in a class action is usually facing an indeterminate, but potentially large liability. The class action may well attract media attention, particularly if its promoters are trying to recruit more claimants to their action.

On the other hand, class actions can sometime offer opportunities to alert and prepared defendants. There have been some examples of early attacks on class actions resulting in them backfiring spectacularly on their promoters. In other circumstances, where a defendant is interested in resolving a large number of potential claims, a class action may offer the prospect of efficiently settling a substantial liability in one fell swoop.

Class actions in Australia

In 1992, the Australian Federal Parliament introduced legislation to allow class actions to be brought in the Federal Court. While the legislation refers to "representative proceedings" the term "class actions", borrowed from the United States is commonly used to describe this sort of procedure.

These amendments formed part of a package of reforms aimed at improving "access to justice". They included changes to various state and territory laws which removed the long standing restrictions on lawyers' advertising for clients and introduced a limited form of contingency fee for lawyers.

Taken as a whole these changes have significantly increased the level of litigation in Australia. Advertisements by lawyers offering to act for plaintiffs on a no win no fee began appearing in newspapers and on radio. This, in turn, led to the emergence of a number of prominent law firms specialising in large scale litigation on behalf of plaintiffs. Australia quickly became the place outside the United States where a corporation was most likely to become embroiled in speculative, lawyer driven, litigation.

While the growth in the number of class actions since 1992 has been a steady rather than spectacular, what has been noticeable in the last 5 years is the number of actions commenced in which the class said to be represented is truly massive, running to tens, or even hundreds, of thousands. Some examples include:

  • an estimated 60,000 class members in a smoking and health class action;
  • an action concerning price fixing for vitamins, where the original class definition included all direct or indirect purchasers of price-fixed vitamins between 1992 and 1999, likely to be a substantial proportion of persons residing in Australia during this period;
  • approximately 25,000 persons the subject of the recent settlement of a shareholders' claim; and
  • a potential class of 1.4 million in litigation arising out of an interruption to gas supplies in Melbourne.

There are two more recent developments which seem likely to influence the direction of Australian class actions in the near future.

The first is the emergence of mass litigation concerning shares and other financial products. Australia's first shareholders' claim was commenced in August 1999 and was settled in August 2003. It was a class action which alleged misleading conduct on behalf of a large insurance company while defending a hostile takeover bid. That conduct was said to have caused loss to many shareholders. The terms of the settlement, which should see each class member recover about 60% of their claim, included a payment of $15 million in costs to the lawyers representing the plaintiff.

This result is likely to lead to more of this type of such litigation. Indeed, no sooner was the first action settled than another was commenced in November 2003, this time alleging misleading conduct by a company leading to a profit downgrade. The prospect of mass litigation relating to corporate governance issues and financial forecasts is going to place more pressure on boards and management.

At the same time we are seeing the growth of a commercial litigation funding industry. There are a number of litigation funders who are prepared to underwrite the costs of litigation in exchange for the share of the proceeds if the litigation is successful. These are entirely commercial operations - indeed Australia even has a publicly listed litigation funder, IMF Limited, which claims that it is, as far as it knows, the only such company to be publicly listed in the world.

Lawyers are prohibited from entering into these sorts of funding arrangement. However, the funders are not lawyers and, as such, offer a means for plaintiff's to circumvent the restrictions imposed on lawyers and spread the risk of speculative litigation. However, the consequence is that the litigation looks increasingly like a commercial venture.

The litigation industry suffered some setbacks in 2003, with 2 Australian courts rejecting quasi-class actions supporting by litigation funders, in part because of the courts' concerns that the litigation funders' involvement might corrupt the litigation process. However, the industry is unlikely to be dissuaded and will no doubt develop ways to address these concerns.

The three developments mentioned above are interrelated. The increase in the size of class actions reflects a realisation on the part of those who promote such actions that they must be run on a commercial basis - the larger the class the greater the potential for profit. Similarly, the growing interest of litigation funders in class actions reflects an awareness of the opportunity to profit from them. As the conduct of class actions becomes increasingly commercial we are seeing a shift in focus from the more traditional personal injury actions to litigation with a more commercial flavour.

The mechanics of a class action

The United States has the best known and most developed class action procedure of any jurisdiction. Tales of class action litigation in the United States are commonly related as examples of the excesses of the US culture of litigation.

However, it may surprise many people to know that the Australian class action procedure is in many respects more plaintiff-friendly than the US procedure.

All that is required to commence a class action in Australia is that:

  • there are 7 or more persons who have claims against the same person (it is not necessary that one identify the 7 persons, merely that a court can be satisfied that there are at least 7);
  • the claims are in respect of, or arise out of, the same, similar or related circumstances; and
  • the claims give rise to a substantial common issue of law or fact.

This differs from the US in several respects.

First, and most importantly, Australia has no certification requirement. In the US procedure the plaintiff must obtain court certification for the class action before it proceeds. This involves convincing the court at an early stage that the proceedings meet the requirements for a class action and, in particular that the issues in the class action are such as to lend themselves to a grouped determination. This process is entirely absent from the Australian system.

Of course, a defendant to an Australian class action is entitled to challenge the constitution of the action and argue that it does not meet the 3 requirements set out above. However, it is the defendant and not the plaintiff who bears the onus on such an application.

Second, in satisfying the requirement that there be a "substantial common issue" there is no need to show that the common issues predominate over individual issues. Under the US system the certification process involves an examination of the degree of difference between the claims of the individual class members. There is no requirement for such an examination in Australia. It is enough that there be one common issue which is "real or of substance".

Third, the Australian courts have power to manage the litigation by splitting the class into sub-groups to deal with discrete issues. This gives Australian courts wide discretion to deal with a group of claims as a class action even in circumstances where there are numerous differences between the claims of the class members.

The liberal threshold requirements for class actions have been reflected in a liberal approach by the courts to the use of even their residual discretions to order that proceedings not continue as a class action. The consequence is that it is becoming increasingly difficult to achieve a quick and early defeat of a class action.

The opt out system and its consequences

Australia has an "opt out" system for class actions.

The person who commences a class action is required to describe the class of persons who are being represented. Once the class is described, every person in that class is assumed to be part of the class unless they decide to "opt out" of the action by filing a notice with the court in a specified form.

This "opt out" system enables plaintiff's lawyers to create huge claims with a stroke of the pen. It was initially seen as one of the attractions of the Australian procedure for plaintiffs.

However, it has proved to be something of a double edged sword, for a number of reasons.

One difficulty which confronts plaintiff's lawyers is convincing class members to provide financial support for a class action, especially in the early stages. Since the rules provide that any class member who is in the class will obtain the benefit (or the burden) of any judgment in relation to common issues, many class members take the view that there is no need for them to be actively involved in supporting the class action.

There have been several instances of class actions being commenced within days of an event giving rise to claims because the lawyers perceive that being "first to file" will give them an advantage both in recruiting class members and in being entitled by the court to act as the representatives for the class.

Although a wide class definition has the advantage for a plaintiff of including more claims, there is also a risk too wide a class definition will render the action vulnerable to attack. Despite Australia's liberal class action laws there have been several examples of class actions failing or becoming bogged down in interlocutory steps because class definition was drawn too widely.

A third difficulty concerns notice. One consequence of having an "opt out" system is that there must be a procedure which allows the court to be satisfied that, as far as possible, the class members have been notified of the existence of the class action and are broadly aware of the issues it raises. The court rules require that the court to order that a notice of the class action be issued and give the court broad powers to make orders as to its method of publication.

The form of the notice can often be a highly contentious issue. Even a relatively simple class action can be difficult to present and explain in summary form. The notification process can also be costly - it may involve direct mailings and advertisements in national newspapers. These costs are usually borne by the plaintiff, at least at first instance.

The final difficulty concerns settlement. While the "opt out" procedure enables one to easily create a large class at the beginning of an action, if one is to settle a claim it is ultimately necessary to determine the true breadth of the class and the value of their claims. Unless this is done it can be difficult for a defendant to properly assess its potential liability and therefore to engage in settlement discussions.

These difficulties have led to plaintiff's lawyers to step away from the "opt out" system. Class definitions are seldom drawn as widely as they were 5 years ago and plaintiffs are increasingly asking courts to make orders to "close the class" - that is to restrict the class to certain identified individuals.

A judgment in a class action binds all class members who have not opted out at the time of judgment. Similarly, a settlement of a class action, which must be approved by the court, may be made in such a way as to bind all members of a class.

As a consequence, class actions do offer opportunities to defendants who are interested in a final resolution of the whole of a potential liability. It may be possible, if the price is right, to obtain an order from the court which effectively puts an end to any further litigation.

Other systems

This article has focussed on the Federal class actions system. The Federal Court is just one of many jurisdictions available to plaintiffs in Australia. There are many types of claims which it cannot hear.

One Australian state, Victoria, introduced a class action scheme which is essentially identical to the Federal Court scheme. No other state has followed suit, although South Australia has its own (little used) rules dealing with class actions.

Nevertheless, with the growing expertise amongst lawyers in the conduct of mass plaintiff litigation there have been several attempts to bring such actions in the state courts. Each state court has an old procedure allowing for a limited form of class action. In 1995 many of the restrictions on the use of these procedures which were thought to prevent their use for class actions were removed by the High Court.


In recent times there has been a backlash against the level of litigation, particularly personal injury in Australia. That arose from the public liability crisis driven by increasing insurance premiums which came to a head in 2002 and resulted in reforms to personal injury litigation to make it more difficult for plaintiffs to succeed. Some states, including NSW, have reimposed restrictions on advertising by lawyers.

However, there has been no attempt to alter the rules in relation to class actions. As plaintiff's lawyers look for alternatives to their traditional areas of endeavour, class actions, particular class actions relating to financial products seem to be a fertile field for development. Such actions offer great opportunity for profit, especially if the risk can be shared with a litigation funder. As such, the trend towards such actions is likely to continue in the foreseeable future.


Clayton Utz News Alert is intended to provide commentary and general information. It should not be relied upon as legal advice. Formal legal advice should be sought in particular transactions or on matters of interest arising from this bulletin. In respect of legal services provided in NSW, liability limited by the Solicitors' Scheme approved under the Professional Standards Act 1994 (NSW).

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.