Australia: 2012 Developments in Professional Indemnity

Insurance Update (Australia)
Last Updated: 14 April 2013
Article by Robert Crittenden and Lachlan Heather

2012 saw the introduction of legislation requiring certain professionals to hold professional indemnity insurance. Insurers may wish to consider amending existing policies or writing new policies in anticipation of the amendments.


Anthony Roberts, the New South Wales (NSW) Minister for Fair Trading, released an exposure draft for the Property, Stock and Business Agents Amendment (Professional Indemnity Insurance) Regulation 2012 (NSW). The proposed Regulation seeks to introduce a requirement for persons licensed under the Property, Stock and Business Agents Act 2002 (NSW) to have and maintain a policy of professional indemnity insurance as a condition of the licence. The policy must provide cover for civil liability arising from specified situations, with a minimum cover of AU$1 million for any one claim and AU$3 million aggregate for all claims made during the policy period.

The amendments will affect real estate agents, stock and station agents, business agents, strata managing agents, community managing agents and on-site residential property managers. The closing date for submissions was 5 October 2012. There has been no subsequent update as to when the Regulation will commence.


On 24 May 2012, Anthony Roberts MP approved the policy of professional indemnity insurance (Number LPS011195725) of Vero Insurance Limited and Allianz Australia Limited from 1 July 2012 until 30 June 2013. Conveyancers must be insured under a policy of professional indemnity insurance (cl 6(1) Conveyancers Licensing Regulation 2006 (NSW)). The above policy will now be available to those conveyancers wishing to enter into new policies.


On 1 September 2012, clause 13 of the Architects Regulation 2012 (NSW) introduced the NSW Architects Code of Professional Conduct. Clause 16 of the Code requires architects to hold and maintain a policy for professional indemnity insurance.

A failure to comply with this requirement constitutes unsatisfactory professional conduct for the purposes of the Architects Act 2003 (NSW) and may be grounds for disciplinary action under Part 4 of that Act.


2012 saw the courts dealing with a variety of legal principles in the context of professional indemnity claims, including advocates' immunity, loss of chance and causation. As expected, proportionate liability continues to be in focus. On 3 April 2013, the High Court allowed the appeal in Hunt & Hunt v Mitchell Morgan Nominees Pty Ltd & Ors [2013] HCA 10. The New South Wales Court of Appeal had held that the loss suffered by Mitchell Morgan due to Hunt & Hunt's negligence was different from the loss suffered due to the fraudster's conduct. The High Court rejected that reasoning, finding that the loss suffered by Mitchell Morgan was its inability to recover the lent money, which was caused by both Hunt & Hunt's negligence and the fraudster's inducement to enter into the transaction.

Further guidance on when proportionate liability applies

In The Owners Strata Plan 69312 v Allianz Australia Insurance Limited [2012] NSWSC 1477, the NSW Supreme Court found that a claim for indemnity under a policy of insurance is not an apportionable claim to which proportionate liability applies. In doing so, the court held that the insurer's failure to indemnify did not involve a failure to take reasonable care within the meaning of section 34(1)(a).

In Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Hamilton [2012] NSWSC 242, the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA) commenced proceedings against a solicitor for breach of a warranty of authority. The court held that the proportionate liability regime does not apply, as the claim being made by the CBA was not a claim for damages arising from a failure to exercise reasonable care. Moreover, the solicitor's fraudulent conduct caused the damage, and so s 34A(1)(b) applied to exclude the proportionate liability provisions. The case is also noteworthy as the court, while determining contributory negligence could not be used as a defence given the type of action pleaded, nonetheless went on to assess that CBA was 35% contributory negligent due to various weaknesses in its practices and procedures.

In the decision of Curtin University of Technology v Woods Bagot Pty Ltd [2012] WASC 449 (see page 63), the Supreme Court of Western Australia found that the proportionate liability regime does not apply to commercial arbitrations. Accordingly, practitioners and insurers need to keep in mind the forum in which they agree to hear a dispute.

Advocates' immunity

The long standing defence of advocates' immunity was upheld by the Supreme Court of Victoria in Goddard Elliot (a firm) v Fritsch [2012] VSC 87. The plaintiff sued his solicitor, barristers and accountant for, amongst other things, negligence and breach of contract. In their defence, the solicitor relied on "advocates' immunity", which protects advocates from suit in relation to in-court work and certain out-of-court work, which leads to a decision affecting the conduct of the case in court. The court apportioned liability 75% to the solicitor and 25% jointly to the two barristers (the barristers and accountant settled with the plaintiff prior to the hearing). However, consistent with High Court authority, the court further held that advocates' immunity applied and that the solicitor had a complete defence to the claim. Costs were awarded in favour of the solicitor.

Likewise, in a strong judgment on 18 December 2012 (Donnellan v Woodland [2012] NSWCA 433), the NSW Court of Appeal confirmed that advocates' immunity applies to "wasted costs" cases. It also gave strong indication that it applied in settled cases.

Loss of chance – causation and standards of proof

The NSW Court of Appeal provided further guidance as to the standards of proof applicable to loss of chance cases in Pritchard v DJZ Constructions Pty Ltd & Ors; Gillies & Anor v DJZ Constructions Pty Ltd & Ors [2012] NSWCA 196.The trial judge had awarded 100% damages against a solicitor for providing negligent advice. Damages were reduced by 30% on appeal. The decision is useful in deriving the following standards of proof:

  • In determining whether a solicitor's negligent advice caused loss or damage to a plaintiff, the court will consider past hypothetical questions, including the impact of receiving non-negligent advice. Those questions will be assessed on the balance of probabilities (ie over 50%).
  • To determine how damages for loss of chance might be calculated where a solicitor has given negligent advice, the court will take degrees of probabilities/possibilities into account (ie could be less than 50%).

Gung ho clients and causation

In Simply Irresistible Pty Ltd v Couper [2012] VSCA 128, the Victoria Court of Appeal found in favour of a solicitor in an action for a failure to advise on the exercise of an option to repurchase property. The trial judge, with whom the Court of Appeal agreed, found that the solicitor had failed to properly advise the plaintiff on the option. However, it was held that the breach did not cause any loss suffered. In making its finding, the Court of Appeal held the plaintiff would have proceeded with its course of action regardless of what advice was given. The court stated that the question of causation could not be resolved by applying an objective test as to what a prudent client would have done if properly advised. Rather, it is the subjective state of mind of the particular client that is relevant. In this instance, the court relied on the factors listed by the trial judge in concluding that the plaintiff did not establish its loss was caused by the breach of retainer or breach of duty, and therefore was only entitled to nominal damages for breach of contract.

Contributory negligence and the Fair Trading Act revisited

In last year's decision of Perpetual v Milanex (in Liquidation) [2011] NSWCA 36 (Milanex), the Court of Appeal held a defence of contributory negligence is not available for a claim for damages arising as a result of a breach (or contravention) of section 42 of the Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) (misleading and deceptive conduct).

This year, the Court of Appeal arguably brought into question the correctness of Milanex in Monaghan Surveyors Pty Ltd v Stratford Glen-Avon Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 94. While the court did not ultimately need to decide the issue, it referred to Milanex and then noted common law position that contributory negligence is a defence to a cause of action even if it is based on breach of statutory duty. Interestingly, the issue was also raised in the previously mentioned case of Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Hamilton, although the court there similarly did not have to decide the issue.

Given the remarks in both cases, we expect the issue will gain further attention in the future.

© DLA Piper

This publication is intended as a general overview and discussion of the subjects dealt with. It is not intended to be, and should not used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. DLA Piper Australia will accept no responsibility for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this publication.

DLA Piper Australia is part of DLA Piper, a global law firm, operating through various separate and distinct legal entities. For further information, please refer to

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions