Our article last month referred to the recently created Road Safety
Remuneration Tribunal (“RSRT”) issuing a statement seeking
written submissions on matters that should be included in its
Annual Work Program.
The deadline for initial submissions has passed. Submissions were
received from individuals and organisations, such as unions and
In last month’s article, we told you we would monitor these
submissions so here are some of the key proposals which
interested parties believe the RSRT should identify in its Annual
issues and practices within the retail sector, and specifically the supermarket subsector, including low rates of pay, inappropriate or illegal methods of payment, unsafe deadlines, timeslot restrictions and penalties, unpaid waiting and loading times at distribution centres, and the incidence of payments to small supply chain operators that are insufficient to ensure safe rates are paid to employee drivers and owner drivers;
the impact of “insecure workers” (contractors and labour hire casual workers) on remuneration-related incentives and pressures that contribute to unsafe work practices;
compliance with relevant road transport awards by participants in the road transport industry;
the use of telematics technology (e.g. GPS) as a method of monitoring driving and improving safety;
the effect of unpaid hours and artificially low kilometre and basic pay rates;
the provision of tender documents that do not reflect realistic commercial and operational practices;
the pressures for discounting freight rates with little alignment to recognised costing models; and
an objective assessment of the costs of undertaking freight tasks.
These submissions will form the basis of the Annual Work
Program of RSRT over the next year. It is important for employers,
principal contractors and consignors to consider making
submissions in response to the initial submissions which may
result in the creation of Road Safety Remuneration Orders.
Any submissions in reply from interested parties should be
submitted to the RSRT by 4.00pm AEST on Tuesday, 16 October
If you are interested in making a submission in reply and would
like our assistance, please contact us.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Long experience representing many of Australia's leading employers has taught us that in employment litigation the identity of an employee's representative is a major factor in how employee litigation runs.
Australian employees receive certain entitlements (such as annual leave and superannuation) where contractors do not.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).