Australia: Messenger Press – the foreign exchange gain/loss saga continues

Last Updated: 12 August 2012
Article by Tony Frost, Ken Spence and Nick Heggart

At first glance, the Federal Court decision in Messenger Press Proprietary Limited v FCT looks like 'old news' (forgive the pun). The events, which involved the News Corporation group, happened in the late 1980s and early 1990s under tax rules that have now been superseded twice – by the Div.775 forex rules in 2003 and more recently by the Div.230 TOFA rules in 2010. Nevertheless, the case contains important lessons about the former foreign exchange rules in Division 3B of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 which will have an impact on forex matters still in dispute.

Forex has always been difficult for Courts, taxpayers and the ATO, and the confusion continues in the case. If nothing else, this case validates the decision to codify the treatment of foreign exchange in the much-maligned Div.775 forex rules. Flawed as they are, this case is convincing evidence that something needed to be done.

1 Facts and issues

The precise issue in the case was whether the taxpayer was entitled to deduct in 2001 and 2002 currency exchange losses totalling approximately AUD 2bn, arising from the decline in the Australian dollar against the US dollar between 1991 and 2001-02.

Given the passage of time, establishing the facts proved especially difficult. In the first third of the judgment, Perram J tries to reconstruct what occurred and in the next third he tries to analyse the legal consequences that follow from the facts as found. It is only then that the tax issues could be explored. In several instances, the Court's holding on an issue is critically affected by the findings of fact.

Reduced to its essence, the dispute is relatively simple. In June 1991, the taxpayer consolidated and refinanced a number of debts denominated in various currencies, borrowing USD 2.8bn from a subsidiary. It repaid that consolidated debt in two tranches, partly in 2001 and the balance in 2002. The taxpayer claimed the repayments triggered forex losses of AUD 629m in 2001 and AUD 1.4bn in 2002.

And yet the parties fought over many facts and transactions which pre-dated the loan. This was apparently driven by a particular view asserted by the ATO about the need to establish antecedent transactions so that the one giving rise to the forex loss could be sustained.

2 Some observations of the judgment

The complexity of the facts and the reasoning precludes a comprehensive analysis of the case in the space available. What follows are disparate observations on some of the curious and novel aspects of the decision.

2.1 Foreign currency or AUD?

Under Div 3B, a forex loss could only arise from transactions undertaken in foreign currency. Div 3B did not apply to a transaction effected in AUD, even if the amount of AUD was calculated as the equivalent of an amount of (say) USD. Descriptions in the taxpayer's accounts were often ambivalent. For example, one transaction was recorded as occurring at 'US$2,270,000,000 or its Australian Dollar equivalent' [para 22]. Was this recording:

  • a transaction which occurred in AUD, the amount of AUD being derived from a
  • figure expressed in USD; or
  • a transaction which occurred in USD, which should be translated into a stated amount of AUD for the purposes of the taxpayer's records?

This issue manifested itself in respect of one advance and share issue. The taxpayer argued that it had impliedly borrowed USD 168m as a result of an advance to the taxpayer's subsidiary to pay for a share issue being made to the taxpayer. The Court concluded that the lender advanced by some means funds equal to USD 168.5m, but it was not clear from the evidence how the advance was made or in what currency. The Court later inferred that this advance should be regarded as having been made in AUD because it satisfied the taxpayer's obligation to the subsidiary which was denominated in AUD and there was no antecedent obligation to lend an amount to the taxpayer in a foreign currency. This gave rise to an obligation on the taxpayer to repay in AUD. This finding of fact eliminated any forex aspect.

2.2 Transactions in foreign currency v. rights and obligations in foreign currency

In several places the judge takes the position that the proper legal analysis of the transaction should focus not on the denomination of the cash flows, but rather on the currency of the underlying rights and obligations. This complicates the analysis significantly.

The best example is the first loan analysed by the Court. The parties set up a multi-currency loan under which the lender agreed to make loans amounting to AUD 3bn available in AUD, GBP and USD. The funds were actually advanced by the lender in a single cheque, drawn on an Australian bank, denominated in AUD.

The ATO argued that the taxpayer had borrowed in AUD because that was the currency of the cheque. The judge, however, took the view that this was a multicurrency loan even though the funds had been advanced exclusively in AUD.

2.3 The idea of an 'exchange'

The early part of the judgment examines the question whether the realisation of a foreign currency position had occurred.

The judge took the view that, under Div 3B, a forex loss is incurred when there is an 'exchange' of currency, or a liability expressed in one currency for cash or a liability expressed in another.

The language of 'exchange' in this context can be traced back to the High Court decision in Energy Resources of Australia (ERA) which held that the refinancing of a USD loan with another USD loan did not trigger a foreign exchange gain or loss. Even if that reasoning made sense in ERA, it fails to elucidate in this context.

Evidence of the problems that using this terminology leads to can be seen in the analysis of a separate and more straightforward loan and share acquisition. The Court found a relevant 'exchange' of obligations:

the effect of the settlement was to discharge [the taxpayer's] Australian dollar liability to [the subsidiary to pay for the shares] by replacing it with a US dollar liability to [the lender]. In other words: an exchange of liabilities denominated in different currencies.

This is a curious description to apply to borrowing money and then buying an asset – that the liability to pay the seller for the asset had been 'exchanged' for a liability owed to the lender to repay the loan. Describing this as 'an exchange of liabilities' is not enlightening.

2.4 Transacting in cash v. negotiable instruments

Foreign exchange transactions may involve cash flows – an amount of AUD is exchanged for USD to repay a debt denominated in USD. Do the same rules apply if there is no physical flow of funds, but rather an exchange of liabilities – for example, if the USD debt is 'repaid' by the issue of a promissory note denominated in AUD?

The ATO argued that Division 3B did not extend to transactions effected by negotiable instruments, only transactions involving flows of cash. The judge disagreed with this conclusion, and ruled that the exchange of a liability in one currency for a liability in another was within the scope of the rules.

The judge paid particular attention to why the High Court decision in ERA did not require a different conclusion. ERA, he said, analysed what happens when there is no exchange at all, whether of money or liabilities and said nothing to support the ATO's argument that only an exchange of cash would suffice.

2.5 'Lending' by the transfer of negotiable instruments

A point of commercial law arose because many of the transactions in the case were effected by transfers of promissory notes or other negotiable instruments. These transfers were not accounted for as sales of assets as the Commissioner asserted was appropriate. Apparently, the taxpayer treated the transactions as loans of the face value of the instruments and in the currency of the instrument.

Interestingly, the judge took the view that the transactions were loans, but not necessarily of the face value of the instrument or in the currency of the instruments.

The Court inferred that there must have been an underlying loan agreement evidenced by the issue by the taxpayer of its own promissory note. The transfer of the promissory notes to the taxpayer was simply the means by which value was provided to the taxpayer.

2.6 Dual conversions

A particular argument raised by the ATO involved the assertion that Div 3B only applied if currency had been converted twice – out of AUD into a foreign currency, and then from the foreign currency back to AUD. This argument, which appears to be based on a particular reading of ERA, probably explains why so much of the judgment is occupied by examining events which occurred prior to the June 1991 loan.

The judge side-stepped the issue, saying that in his view there generally had been two exchanges, but he also said that he doubted whether the text of Div 3B supported this position. This conclusion is important, although obiter. The judge was prepared to accept that a deductible loss could occur without currency having been first converted out of AUD and then back into AUD. He gives as an example:

it is not difficult to imagine circumstances in which a single conversion may generate losses. A US dollar loan used by a taxpayer to acquire a capital asset in the United States but serviced from a supply of Australian dollars converted at the time of each repayment to US dollars will generate losses if there is an adverse shift in the exchange rate. In this context an increased expense is a loss.

Again, the judge examined ERA and concluded that it did not require a different conclusion.

2.7 'Under' an eligible contract

The ATO also argued that the losses in question were not deductible because they did not arise 'under' an eligible contract, again relying on a passage in ERA.

The ATO's argument was that a forex loss only arises 'under' a contract if the terms of the contract permit or require that a currency conversion occur.

Perram J disagreed that ERA required this view and concluded that:

it is sufficient for the purposes of Division 3B for a loss to result from the repayment, as here, of a foreign currency loan when there has been a decline in the value of the Australian dollar. In such cases the loss arises under the loan agreement.

3 Holding

The result of the case was that the assessment was held to be excessive. Given that the dispute was about the decision to reject the taxpayer's objection to an assessment, one would have thought the matter could be resolved by an order that the ATO allow the objection. However, the judge threw into doubt so many other matters he required the parties to come back to court with a draft of the appropriate orders.

4 Appeal

Given the amount of money involved, it seems unlikely that this will be the end of this case. However, much of the result turns on the particular findings of facts made by the judge. Ordinarily, findings of fact are rarely over-turned on appeal, but when so many of the facts have been inferred, or are conclusions of law, perhaps that difficulty will prove less daunting to the ATO.

Moreover, there are enough questions of law – both in regard to the commercial effect of the transactions that occurred and the interpretation of Div 3B – that an appeal on those questions alone seems inevitable.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Greenwoods & Freehills are the winners of the 2011 BRW Client Choice Awards.

articles to be approved by Kris Fields

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.