Australia: Snowy HYDRO Case and recent Legislative changes to stamp duty

Tax Update
Last Updated: 29 July 2012
Article by James Newnham and Eddie Ahn

Substantive legislative reforms to the stamp duty law continue across several Australian states, including the major change, the introduction of a landholder duty regime in Victoria. We also provide an analysis of two recent land-rich duty decisions of the Victorian Court of Appeal.

In light of these recent legislative changes, you should reassess the potential stamp duty implications of any proposed investments in entities that own land in Australia. In particular, the scope of investments in land-owning entities that may be subject to duty in Victoria has been considerably broadened under the new Victorian landholder duty regime, for example, through the removal of the 60% "land-rich" test and the levying of duty on certain acquisitions of "economic entitlements".

In addition, you should note that the majority of states and territories have deferred the abolition of various duties, in particular, duty on the transfer of business assets, mortgage duty in NSW and unlisted marketable securities duty in NSW and SA, which were previously announced to be abolished on 1 July 2012.

Where you are uncertain of the stamp duty implications of existing or proposed transactions, in light of the recent legislative changes, you should seek professional stamp duty advice to ensure the correct stamp duty treatment.


Victorian landholder duty regime

From 1 July 2012, a new landholder duty regime was introduced in Victoria to replace the existing land-rich duty regime. Broadly speaking, these rules will expand the type of arrangements involving the acquisition of interests in a Victorian land-owning entity that are subject to duty.

The key change under the landholder duty regime is that the existing 60% "land-rich" test will be removed and duty is now applied to acquisitions over the new acquisition thresholds in entities that hold land in Victoria valued at $1 million or more.

Key features of the landholder duty regime include:

  • For the purposes of the landholder duty provisions, the concept of "land" is expanded and includes any item that is "fixed to the land", even if not a fixture under general law or is owned separately/legally separate from the land under other legislation.
  • Acquisitions of 90% or more in landholders that are listed companies, listed trusts or widely held trusts are now subject to duty. However, the rate of duty is 10% of the general rate, provided the entity has held the relevant status for at least 12 months.
  • Acquisitions of "economic interests" (eg synthetic instruments) in landholders can also trigger landholder duty.
  • The acquisition thresholds to trigger landholder duty (ie for "significant interests") are as follows:
    • For a private trust: 20% or more (unlike other states and territories, this has not been increased to 50%)
    • For a private company or a wholesale trust: 50% or more
    • For a listed company or trust: 90% or more.
  • There have been minor changes to the requirements for a "wholesale unit trust" and "qualified investor".
  • Certain transitional provisions will apply to interests acquired prior to 1 July 2012.

The Victorian landholder duty regime has some key differences with the landholder duty regimes in most other Australian states and territories (eg different acquisition thresholds for unit trusts and companies, levying of duty on "economic entitlements"). In this regard, transactions involving acquisitions in entities that own land in various Australian jurisdictions will be increasingly complex and you should be aware that the stamp duty treatment in each jurisdiction will not necessarily be consistent.

Deferral of abolition of stamp duties

Various states and territories in their 2012 Budgets have deferred the abolition date of certain duties, in particular, share transfer duty and business transfer duty, as follows:

  • NSW: The abolition of duties on share/unit transfers, non-land business transfers and mortgage duty has been deferred to 1 July 2013 (all previously 1 July 2012).
  • SA: The abolition of duties on share/unit transfers (previously 1 July 2012) and non-land business transfers has been deferred indefinitely (previously 1 July 2013).
  • Qld: The abolition of duties on non-land business transfers has been deferred indefinitely (previously 1 July 2013).
  • NT: The abolition of duties on non-land business transfers has been deferred indefinitely (previously 1 July 2012).

ACT landholder duty – unit trust acquisition threshold

From 1 July 2012, the acquisition threshold for landholder duty in ACT for unit trusts was increased from 20% to 50%, to align with the rules in other states (excluding Victoria).

Land-rich/landholder duty – current thresholds

Land Value Threshold Asset % Threshold Acquisition Threshold Listed entities? Goods dutiable?
ACT - - 50% - -
NSW $2,000,000 - 50% Y Y
NT $500,000 - 50% Y Y
Qld $2,000,000 - 50% Y -
SA $1,000,000 - 50% Y Y
Tas $500,000 60% 50% - -
Vic* $1,000,000 - 50%/20%* Y -
WA $2,000,000 - 50% Y Y

* 20% for unlisted unit trusts


The Victorian Court of Appeal held that the acquisition of all the shares in a company, La Trobe Valley BV, was subject to land-rich duty, on the basis that the value of the power plant facility owned by its wholly owned subsidiary was not to be reduced for the interest of a joint venture partner in the power facility.

Background facts

In 2005, the taxpayer purchased all the shares in La Trobe Valley BV (LVBV). Its wholly owned subsidiary, Valley Power (VP), owned land in Victoria on which it operated an electricity power plant under a Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) with Contact Peaker Australia Pty Ltd (CP). The power plant assets included land, buildings, cabling and piping, six electricity generating units and other plant and equipment.

Under the terms of the JVA, VP held a 60% interest and CP held a 40% interest in the joint venture. VP was the legal owner of the land and generators. VP leased two of the generators to CP. The parties agreed to use the joint venture assets to produce electricity, which was to be owned in the agreed proportions.

The parties also entered into a trading agreement at the same time as the JVA, under which VP entered into certain hedge contracts (Cap Contracts), which generated substantial revenue for the joint venture. The Cap Contracts were in VP's name but, under the Trading Agreement, VP received 40% of the Cap Contract revenue on behalf of CP.

The Commissioner assessed the taxpayer for duty on the share purchase on the basis that LVBV was "land rich" for the purposes of the Duties Act 2000 (Vic) (the Act) via its ownership of the shares in VP. The Commissioner also imposed a 20% penalty on the basis that the taxpayer had failed to take reasonable care.

The key issue was whether the value of LVBV's land holdings (being the numerator in the relevant formula) comprised 60% or more of the value of all its assets (being the denominator in the formula).

At first instance, the Supreme Court allowed the taxpayer's appeal against the Commissioner's assessment on the basis that the JVA gave CP a 40% equitable proprietary interest in the land and generators for the period of the joint venture, which reduced the value of LVBV's attributed land holding for duty purposes such that the 60% threshold was not reached.

The Commissioner appealed and the taxpayer also cross-appealed on certain other matters.


In a joint decision, the court (Maxwell P, Redlich JA and Robson AJA) allowed the Commissioner's appeal and dismissed the taxpayer's cross-appeal, and held that:

Numerator - VP's landholdings

  1. The generators were fixtures for the reasons provided by the Supreme Court at first instance. It was abundantly clear that the units were installed on the land "for the long term use of that site as a gas turbine electricity generation plant". The units were bolted to the ground so that the entire site could function safely and efficiently as a power plant, to which purpose the site had been unconditionally, and indefinitely, dedicated.
  2. Based on the terms of the JVA, CP had no equitable interest in the land and thus the value of VP's interest in the land was not to be reduced for CP's interests under the JVA. There was no statement or clear intention in the JVA for VP to convey a proprietary interest in the land to CP. In fact, the actual terms of the JVA and other documentary evidence (eg external valuations) indicated that CP did not have any proprietary interest in the land (excluding its leasehold interest in two of the generator units). The mere fact that the JVA provided CP with a share in the proceeds from a sale of the power plant facility was not sufficient to indicate an intention to transfer a proprietary interest in the land - "an agreement to share proceeds of sale says nothing about ownership". CP's interest in respect of the land was merely a contractual right for the land to be available to the joint venture for the agreed purpose.
  3. There was no question regarding the admissibility of the JVA, since the JVA did not transfer any proprietary interest in the land to CP (and thus was not required to be stamped).
  4. CP's contractual rights under the JVA in respect of the land was to be disregarded in determining the "unencumbered value" of VP's interest in the land.

Denominator - Other assets owned by VP

  1. The Cap Contracts should have been included in the denominator at 60% of their full valuation, rather than 100%. The clear intention of the parties, based on the terms of the Trading Agreement, was for VP to hold the contracts on trust (or alternatively as agent), to the extent of 40%, for CP.
  2. The lease receivable (in respect of the land) should not be included in the denominator as a separate asset from the land. The valuation of VP's total assets for the landrich formula denominator could not properly include both the agreed value of VP's unqualified freehold interest in the land and the value of its right as lessor of the two units to receive rent. Such a computation would have "double counted" the value of VP's right to lease the land. The court also refused the taxpayer leave to advance, which was raised for the first time during the appeal, the alternative argument that the land could have been valued on a different basis (ie by disaggregating the lease receivable from the reversionary interest in the land).
  3. The spare generator unit should have been included in the denominator at 100% of valuation.

Computation of duty and penalties

  1. Based on the above, LVBV was land-rich for duty purposes (land assets comprised 67.7% of its total assets).
  2. The Commissioner ought to have concluded that the taxpayer had taken reasonable care and reduced penalties accordingly. The seeking of legal advice showed, unambiguously, that the taxpayer wished to know whether it had any obligations under the Act and, if so, what they were. Seeking legal advice was both necessary and sufficient for that purpose, on the basis that the question of liability to duty raised issues of considerable complexity. The seeking of a private ruling further signified the taking of care to ensure compliance. On this basis, the 25% penalty tax was reduced to nil.

Impact for taxpayers

Although Victoria replaced its land-rich duty regime with a landholder duty regime from 1 July 2012, this decision is still highly relevant for taxpayers when identifying the nature and value of land interests for stamp duty purposes. In particular, the valuation of land is a key factor in determining the amount of duty payable in respect of a transfer of land or interests in a landholder.

The decision of the Court of Appeal highlights the importance of appropriately drafting clauses in JVAs (and other similar agreements) that involve interests in land to properly reflect the commercial intention of the parties and the expected stamp duty outcomes of their arrangements. Where taxpayers are uncertain of the potential stamp duty implications of their joint venture or similar arrangements, they should seek professional stamp duty advice to ensure that their agreements are appropriately drafted and are aware of the potential stamp duty outcomes (as well reducing the potential exposure to penalties).

Commissioner of State Revenue v Australand Investments Ltd [2012] VSCA 152

We also note that the Victorian Court of Appeal has recently handed down its decision in another landrich duty case, Commissioner of State Revenue v Australand Investments Ltd [2012] VSCA 152. This case concerned the application of land-rich duty to the acquisition of interests in two property trusts resulting from a stapling transaction, as a conversion of a public unit trust to a private unit trust. The court dismissed the appeal and held that a transitional provision applied to exclude duty on the acquisition of the units in one of the trusts. However, the court held that the transitional provisions did not apply to the acquisition of interests in the second trust.

© DLA Piper

This publication is intended as a general overview and discussion of the subjects dealt with. It is not intended to be, and should not used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. DLA Piper Australia will accept no responsibility for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this publication.

DLA Piper Australia is part of DLA Piper, a global law firm, operating through various separate and distinct legal entities. For further information, please refer to

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.