Australia: Cost awards under the Fair Work Act

Proceedings commenced under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) are generally "no cost", meaning that other than in limited circumstances parties must bear their own cost of proceedings, even if successful.

However, a line of recent cases suggests Fair Work Australia, and other courts exercising jurisdiction under this Act, are prepared to exercise discretion to order costs in circumstances where the court is satisfied the proceedings have been instituted vexatiously or without reasonable cause, where there has been an unreasonable act or omission by one party which has caused the other party to incur costs, or where a party has unreasonably refused to participate in a matter before the court.

Following are a number of cases where this has occurred.

Rejection of settlement offer by employer: Mifsud v Veolia Transport Sydney1

On 29 March this year, the Federal Magistrates Court handed down an indemnity cost order under the Fair Work Act against an employer for a fixed amount of $15,000, without imposing a penalty. The Mifsud v Veolia Transport Sydney case concerned the liability of the respondent (Veolia) to make a redundancy payment to Mr Mifsud due under a collective agreement.

Mr Mifsud sought the imposition of a penalty against Veolia in view of a breach of the collective agreement and costs on the basis of an asserted unreasonable act or omission of Veolia in not accepting a written offer of settlement made by Mr Mifsud during the proceedings.

Driver FM concluded it was not appropriate to impose a penalty in the circumstances where he found that Veolia's conduct was not a deliberate breach of the collective agreement, but a genuine but mistaken belief as to the proper interpretation of the agreement. Veolia had no record of prior contraventions and it was held that the imposition of a penalty in this case would not be effective in terms of general nor specific deterrence. It was concluded that Mr Mifsud should receive his costs on an indemnity basis from the expiration of the offer of settlement made to Veolia on 31 August 2011 until the 22 December 2011 judgment.

Under section 570(2)(b) of the Fair Work Act, the court may make an order for costs if it is satisfied that a party's unreasonable act or omission caused the other party to incur costs. Veolia's refusal to accept the Calderbank offer made by letter dated 31 August 2011 was held to be an unreasonable omission that caused Mr Mifsud to incur legal costs up to the date of judgment of 22 December 2011. Veolia's contention that the offer contained in the letter did not satisfy the requirements of a Calderbank offer was rejected, as the intention of the offer was clearly to resolve the entire proceedings.

Driver FM went on to deem it appropriate in the circumstances to award costs on an indemnity basis, as section 570(2) does not restrict the ability of the court to award costs on an indemnity or other basis once the preconditions for an award of costs under the section are met. Not wanting to put the parties to the further expense and trouble of having costs assessed and taxed, Driver FM fixed costs at $15,000, as estimated by counsel for Mr Mifsud.

Rejection of settlement offer by employee: Muzzicato v New Cleaning Services2

Late last year a former employee had costs awarded against him after it was found it was unreasonable for him to reject a $15,000 settlement offer in response to his adverse action claim.

The employee's adverse action claim was summarily dismissed by the Court following a finding that the employee's claim had no reasonable prospects of success. Federal Magistrate Daniel O'Dwyer held there were some "very serious deficiencies" in the presentation of the adverse action claim.

The employee was ordered to pay the employer's costs pursuant to section 570(2)(b) of the Fair Work Act, on the basis of a finding that it was an unreasonable act for him to not accept the settlement offer, which was generous in all the circumstances. The Court also acknowledged there was merit in the argument that costs could be awarded pursuant to section 570(2)(a) – that the proceedings were issued without reasonable cause. The period over which costs were payable was assessed as being the period from the date of rejection of the settlement offer to the date of judgment.

Appeal of unfair dismissal claim "without reasonable cause": Ben Timmins v Compass Security t/a Compass Integrated Security Solutions3

Earlier this year, a Fair Work Australia Full Bench ordered an employee must bear some of the costs of his former employer on the basis that the worker's appeal of the rejection of his unfair dismissal claim was "without reasonable cause."

In the absence of any challenge to the factual or legal basis upon which the earlier decision was made, the bench was satisfied that the requirements in section 611(2) of the Fair Work Act for the making of a costs order were met. It was held the employee made the application to appeal without reasonable cause [section 611(2)(a)] and that the employee pursued the appeal in circumstances where it should have been reasonably apparent to him that it had no reasonable prospect of success [section 611(2)(b)].

The order to be made and amount of costs awarded will be determined by Justice Boulton after providing an opportunity for the parties to make further submissions on this issue.

Unreasonable action in defence of proceedings: Kavassilas v Migration Training Australia4

The Federal Magistrates Court of Australia fined Migration Training Australia $20,000, ordered they pay over $37,000 in compensation and in excess of $57,000 in costs to a dismissed worker for terminating her employment due to her sick leave. Ms Kavassilas was summarily dismissed on her second day of absence by her employer, Migration Training Australia (MTA). She was notified of her termination by a letter delivered to her home outlining various allegations of serious misconduct.

Federal Magistrate Smith found that the letter of termination was "a cloak for [the] unexpressed true reason"' of the dismissal, and that the reasons given in the letter were lacking in substance in circumstances where MTA provided no reliable or clear evidence to support them. The Court ruled the real reason the employee's employment was terminated was because of her temporary absence due to illness, in breach of section 352 of the Fair Work Act.

In addition to imposing a civil penalty of $20,000, MTA was ordered to pay compensation to Ms Kavassilas in the amount of $37,000, representing lost wages and superannuation entitlements from the date of dismissal to the date the employee commenced new employment (less a 20% discount for "uncertain but real contingencies that her employment may not have lasted that long").

MTA were also ordered to pay one half of the employee's legal costs. The Court was satisfied that MTA made a number of "baseless assertions", which Ms Kavassilas was required to answer, causing her to incur unnecessary legal costs. As a result, the assertion and maintenance of most of these false issues until the end of trial constituted unreasonable actions in the defence of proceedings, justifying an award of costs under the Fair Work Act.

Unreasonable act by applicant in rejecting offer of settlement and relying on witnesses with no bearing to case: Cugura v Frankston City Council (No. 2)5

The Federal Magistrates Court has ordered costs against an employee on the basis that the employee rejected a settlement offer for the parties to walk away from the matter and each bear their own costs in circumstances where the applicant had put on little evidence in support of his case and the respondent had filed substantial evidence in support of its defence. The Court ultimately dismissed the employee's adverse action claim.

In awarding costs to the employer, the Court held that the employer's offer should have been considered by the applicant, especially where the applicant had an opportunity to review the employer's evidence at the time the offer was made, and that the applicant had required all of the employer's witnesses for cross examination at trial at significant expense to the employer when these witnesses ultimately had no bearing on the applicant's case.


These cases demonstrate that Fair Work Australia, and courts exercising jurisdiction under the Fair Work Act, are prepared to order costs in appropriate circumstances. Commencing a vexatious claim or maintaining an unreasonable defence, as well as rejecting reasonable settlement offers, are circumstances in which cost orders have been made.

The risk of an adverse costs order being made is likely to affect the way in which applications under the Fair Work Act are litigated.


1Mifsud v Veolia Transport Sydney Pty Ltd [2012] FMCA 167 (29 March 2012)
2Muzzicato v New Cleaning Services Pty Ltd [2011] FMCA 1044 (1 December 2011)
3Ben Timmins v Compass Security t/a Compass Integrated Security Solutions [2012] FWAFB 1093 (21 February 2012)
4Kavassilas v Migration Training Australia Pty Ltd [2012] FMCA 22
5Cugura v Frankston City Council (No. 2) [2012] FMCA 530

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Kemp Strang has received acknowledgements for the quality of our work in the most recent editions of Chambers & Partners, Best Lawyers and IFLR1000.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Nick Noonan
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.