Australia: James Hardie's High Court appeals

Last Updated: 9 May 2012
Article by Tess Lynch

Late last week, the High Court of Australia handed down its decisions in relation to the James Hardie cases1. In the case of the non-executive directors of James Hardie Industries Limited (JHIL), the Court reversed various of the previous findings of the NSW Supreme Court of Appeal, and upheld the trial court's decision that the directors of JHIL had approved a misleading announcement to the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), and, in giving that approval, had failed to exercise the requisite degree of care and diligence as directors of JHIL.

In a separate but related decision, the Court rejected the appeal from Mr Peter James Shafron, JHIL's former company secretary and general counsel, and concluded that Mr Shafron had been an officer of JHIL and, in this capacity, had contravened section 180 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act).

This note will focus on Mr Shafron's contravention and the implications it has for general counsel and other senior in-house corporate lawyers.

Duties as an officer of the company

In relation to Mr Shafron, the James Hardie decisions centred on sections 9 and 180 of the Corporations Act. Under these sections:

  • the expression 'officer' is defined in section 9, with sub-section 9(a) providing that a director or secretary is an officer and section 9(b)(i) further defining an officer as a person who makes, or participates in making, decisions that affect the whole, or a substantial part, of the business of the corporation; and
  • section 180(1) of the Corporations Act confers an obligation on the directors and officers of a company to exercise their responsibilities with care and diligence.

The High Court found that Mr Shafron was an officer of JHIL both by virtue of holding the office of company secretary, and because he participated in making significant decisions about JHIL's business (and in particular, the decision to separate the entities with the asbestos liability from the rest of the James Hardie group). The nature and extent of his participation was more than just providing the board with information and advice, but instead he had a large and active part in coming up with the proposal that he and others put to the JHIL board for approval.

Background to the High Court's ruling

Original decision

The James Hardie decisions revolved around an announcement that JHIL had made to the ASX in 2001 that the foundation that it had set up to pay asbestos compensation claims was 'fully funded'. The trial judge found that Mr Shafron had breached his duties as an officer of JHIL by failing to advise the JHIL board that this announcement was misleading. The court also found further breaches of duties in Mr Shafron's failures to advise JHIL:

  • that it should disclose to ASX information about a Deed of Covenant and Indemnity (DOCI); and
  • that actuarial reports that he had obtained and on which cash flow statements were based did not take into account 'superimposed inflation' (that is, that the rate of asbestos claims costs were increasing much faster that the general inflation rate, which JHIL had used in determining the foundation's ability to satisfy asbestos claims).

Whether Mr Shafron had breached section 180 of the Corporations Act turned on whether he was considered an 'officer' of JHIL. As noted above, section 9 of the Corporations Act deems a company secretary to be an officer by virtue of his or her position. However, Justice Ian Gzell looked at whether Mr Shafron was also an officer under section 9(b)(i) of the Corporations Act.

In making his decision, Gzell J considered Mr Shafron's general duties and functions in his role at JHIL (which included attending board meetings and assisting with drafting board papers) and found that Mr Shafron's involvement with JHIL and the decisions he made "affected the whole or substantial part of the business of JHIL". Mr Shafron was therefore deemed to be an officer both as a secretary and by virtue of his involvement in making decisions for JHIL.

Appeal to NSW Court of Appeal

On appeal, Mr Shafron, along with the seven non-executive directors of JHIL, was successful in arguing that ASIC had not discharged its burden of proof in relation to the question of whether JHIL's board had approved the misleading statements to the ASX.

However, the New South Wales Court of Appeal upheld the rest of the trial court's findings against Mr Shafron and concluded (for the same reasons) that Mr Shafron was an officer of JHIL. The Court found that Mr Shafron's duties extended to providing JHIL with advice about ASX disclosure of the DOCI and superimposed inflation, and therefore in failing to do so, Mr Shafron had breached section 180 of the Corporations Act.

Mr Shafron's appeal to the High Court

On appeal to the High Court, Mr Shafron argued in essence that he wore two hats – one as company secretary, and the other as general counsel – and that his conduct pursuant to each role could and should be evaluated separately. While Mr Shafron acknowledged that he was an officer in his role as company secretary, he contended that he was not an officer in respect of his role as general counsel, and that his conduct in the context of the DOCI and the actuarial reports related to his general counsel role.

What were Mr Shafron's role and responsibilities?

The High Court rejected Mr Shafron's attempt to bifurcate his roles, noting that there was no evidence that he performed any particular tasks in different capacities, and concluding that all the tasks he performed were pursuant to his responsibilities as general counsel and company secretary. The High Court further found that even if the capacities within which Mr Shafron acted could have been distinguished, he was also an officer under the limb of section 9(b)(i) because of the nature and extent of his participation in making significant decisions about JHIL.

In considering the character of his participation in decision making, the High Court focused on the role that he had in the act of making decisions, even though he ultimately did not make the decisions himself. The Court emphasised that Mr Shafron was an employee of JHIL, not an external adviser, and that his role extended well beyond giving advice and information to the board. In particular, the Court found that he was one of a group of three senior executives who were responsible for formulating, and had formulated, the proposal that was put to the JHIL board to separate JHIL from the businesses with the asbestos liability.

While the Court acknowledged that making a 'real contribution' to such a decision would not, in itself, be sufficient to show that a person had participated in making the decision, Mr Shafron's actions, as a senior executive employee of JHIL, rose to the level of 'participation' because he played a large and active part in formulating the separation proposal, in deciding the variant of the proposal that would be put to the board and in promoting that proposal to the board.

In considering the nature of Mr Shafron's responsibilities as company secretary and general counsel, the High Court agreed with the NSW Court of Appeal and the trial judge that, as an officer with a legal background, Mr Shafron's responsibilities included advising JHIL on its legal liabilities and obligations, including ASX disclosure requirements.

Was Mr Shafron in breach of his section 180 duties?

When determining whether Mr Shafron breached section 180 of the Corporations Act, the Court found the relevant measure to be what a reasonable person with his responsibilities would have done.

The Court dismissed Mr Shafron's argument that he was not required to provide disclosure advice because JHIL's external legal advisers were present in the board meeting, as those external advisers had not been engaged to consider disclosure issues. The Court instead held that a reasonable person with Mr Shafron's responsibilities would have advised JHIL to disclose the DOCI to ASX.

The Court also agreed with the Court of Appeals that, although Mr Shafron did not hold actuarial qualifications, he knew about and understood the potential impact of superimposed inflation on the actuarial estimates and cash flow modelling, and as a result a reasonable person with his responsibilities would have drawn the board's attention to the issue.

For general counsel

The High Court has upheld Gzell J's position that general counsel can be considered 'officers' by virtue of their participation in making significant decisions about a company, even though they do not themselves make the decisions.

We confirm our advice for general counsel (and other senior in-house lawyers) from our 2009 article (which discussed the original James Hardie decision):

  • General counsel should be conscious that they may be considered to be "officers" under the Corporations Act even if they do not also hold the role of company secretary. Determining whether a general counsel is an officer will be a question of fact, and will depend on the nature and extent of the person's role in the process of making significant decisions about the company.
  • Officers, like directors, have specific duties under Part 2D.1 of the Corporations Act. In particular, section 280 conveys upon general counsel the obligation to fulfil his or her duties (such as to advise on legal risk) with due care and diligence.
  • General counsel should be reminded that their obligations are ultimately owed to the board, and not merely to the company's chief executive officer or managing director. Informing the CEO or managing director of a particular risk may not relieve the general counsel of his or her duty also to advise the board appropriately (particularly where the general counsel attends board meetings).
  • Formal reporting lines should be implemented to ensure a general counsel's advice is provided effectively to the board. This will assist general counsel in managing their personal liability and will also ensure that important advice is received at the right level.
  • Because most (if not all) general counsel have legal qualifications and expertise, their responsibilities (in the absence of a specific engagement of external counsel) inevitably will include providing advice and guidance to the board in relation to a disclosing entity's continuous disclosure obligations under the Corporations Act and, if applicable, the listing rules of the relevant financial market. The fact that the disclosure requirements may be regarded as being 'common knowledge' is unlikely to absolve general counsel of this duty.
  • In addition, a general counsel may have a duty to draw the board's attention to other significant matters, even though they are outside of the areas of the general counsel's particular expertise, where the general counsel is aware of the existence of the matter and that it could expose the company to significant risks or liability.


1 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Meredith Hellicar & Ors [2012] HCA 17; Peter James Shafron v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2012] HCA 18.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.