Australia: Round 3: High Court Dismisses Challenges to NSW Race Fields Legislation by Betfair and Sportsbet

Last Updated: 21 April 2012
Article by Jamie Nettleton

The eagerly awaited decisions on 30th March 2012 by the High Court in Sportsbet v New South Wales and Betfair v Racing New South Wales clarifies the constitutionality of the New South Wales race fields regime.

The Court dismissed both appeals. This confirms the validity of the race fields regime and the approvals issued by the relevant racing control bodies.


Since 1 September 2008, it has been an offence under section 33 of the Racing Administration Act 1998 (NSW) (the RAA) for a wagering operator to use NSW race fields unless that wagering operator has:

  • been authorised by the relevant racing control body: (Racing New South Wales (RNSW), Harness Racing New South Wales (HRNSW) and Greyhound Racing New South Wales (GRNSW)); and
  • complied with any conditions attached to the approval.

RNSW and HRNSW issued approvals to wagering operators, including:

  • Betfair: a betting exchange licensed in Tasmania; and
  • Sportsbet: a corporate bookmaker licensed in the Northern Territory.

The approvals included a condition that a fee of 1.5% of turnover be paid when the wagering operator's turnover in any given year exceeds $5 million (in the case of RNSW) and $2.5 million (in the case of HRNSW). By way of contrast, the approvals issued by GRNSW included a condition requiring the payment of a fee equivalent to 1.5% of turnover or 10% of gross revenue, whichever is the lesser amount.

The Trial Decisions

Betfair and Sportsbet commenced Federal Court proceedings against RNSW and HRNSW, challenging the imposition of the 1.5% turnover-based fee on the basis that it was discriminatory and protectionist in breach of section 92 of the Australian Constitution.

Betfair argued that the payment of a fee calculated on the basis of turnover was unconstitutional because it imposed a greater burden on its profit than it did on the New South Wales totalisator operator, TAB Ltd (TAB). This was viewed by the Full Court as being the case because its business model is based, in part, on smaller margins and requires higher turnover to achieve equivalent revenues when compared with other models (i.e. bookmakers or totalisators). The primary judge dismissed this claim on the basis that, while Betfair had demonstrated that the use of a turnover benchmark was discriminatory, it had not demonstrated that it was of a protectionist kind.

Sportsbet argued that the entire legislative scheme was invalid because it burdened interstate trade by requiring a fee to be paid for the use of New South Wales race fields. While the primary judge rejected this argument with respect to the RAA and the Racing Administration Regulation 2005 (NSW) (the RAR), the judge found that an arrangement existed between RNSW, HRNSW, TAB and the NSW racing clubs which effectively meant that the NSW operators paid no fee. This caused the approval granted by Sportsbet for 2008 to be declared invalid by the primary judge. The primary judge refused to extend this ruling to the 2009 approval. These discussions were appealed to the Full Court of the Federal Court.

The Full Court Decisions

In the Betfair case, the Full Court dismissed Betfair's appeal. The Full Court held that the primary judge was correct to conclude that Betfair had not made out its case under s 92 of the Constitution by failing to demonstrate that a competitive advantage had been conferred on intrastate operators by using turnover as a benchmark.

Because there was no express discrimination in the RAA or its application (ie. all wagering operators paid a fee of 1.5 percent of turnover), the Court considered that it was necessary for Betfair to demonstrate that the scheme, in practice, provided a competitive advantage to intrastate operators. The Court held that Betfair had failed to establish this on its case.

In the Sportsbet case, the Court upheld RNSW's appeal. The Full Court held that, among other things, the race fields regime introduced by the RAA and the RAR was valid as it imposed a burden equally on all operators. The Court found that there is nothing inherently objectionable under the Australian Constitution where legislation introduces a requirement to pay a fee by all operators (interstate and intrastate) and where that fee overlaps with a fee already payable by intrastate operators, to a course of conduct which grants relief to those operators in respect of the fee to which only they had been subject.

Moreover, the Full Court held that the regime's validity was not affected by virtue of separate action being taken in good faith which had the effect of causing intrastate operators to be compensated in respect of the financial burden that would result from the legislation.

To a considerable degree, the Full Court rejected the primary judge's reasoning because the matters found by the primary judge, particularly those regarding the arrangements between TAB and RNSW, were not argued by Sportsbet in the original proceedings.

These decisions were appealed to the High Court.

High Court decisions

In the Betfair appeal, the High Court held that Betfair had failed to demonstrate that the fee conditions imposed a discriminatory burden of a protectionist nature. The Court referred to the case pleaded by Betfair and noted that s 92 of the Constitution addresses the effect of a law on interstate trade, not the prejudice that law causes to particular traders (even though they may be located interstate).

The Court further held that Betfair had not demonstrated that the likely practical effect of the imposition of the fees would be the loss of market share or profit, or to impede it from increasing that share or profit.

In the Sportsbet appeal, the Court considered the practical effect of the race fields regime on interstate trade having regard to the wagering turnover threshold and commercial arrangements between the relevant racing control bodies and the TAB.

In a manner similar to its consideration of the Betfair appeal, the Court considered that the evidence provided related to the comparative position of the business operations of Sportsbet and its NSW based competitors. It stated that this was not the appropriate benchmark and that it was more appropriate to address the effect on interstate trade.

As to the turnover threshold, the Court held that the wagering turnover thresholds were not discriminatory measures of a protectionist kind. Both intrastate and interstate operators were entitled to the benefit of the threshold and the burden of the fees was imposed uniformly. In any event, there was no necessary connection between the location from which a wagering operator conducted its business and the turnover of that business.

In considering the arrangement between RNSW and the TAB, the Court agreed with the conclusion of the Full Court, namely that it constituted settlement of a dispute and did not give rise to a discriminatory advantage in favour of the TAB, as an intrastate trader.


Racing bodies will consider that the High Court decisions render constitutionally valid:

  • the race fields regime;
  • the calculation of race fields fees by reference to turnover; and
  • the making of payments or concessions to intra-state operators to compensate for the payment of race fields fees.

Although this is the effect of the findings of the High Court in respect of the NSW race fields legislation, it relates only to the 2008 approval and does not necessarily apply to all race fields regimes and all approvals. A different factual context may apply, depending on the circumstances.

However, any challenge of this nature is likely to be strongly contested.

Where to from Here?

In light of the decisions on 30th March 2012, there is the potential for Australian racing bodies to re-evaluate their race fields regimes. This may include amending the basis for calculation of race fields fees so that they are calculated by reference to turnover. The Victorian government has already indicated its intention to facilitate a similar model to that of the NSW racing bodies.

It is also quite possible that there will be considerable pressure for the amounts of the race fields fees payable to be increased significantly. However, any decision should be counterbalanced by the inherent risk that any increase will affect the willingness of wagering operators to pay those fees and make other financial contributions to the relevant bodies. Indeed, wagering operators may choose to give greater preference to other sports.

We consider that this decision is likely to result in the current linkage between product fees and integrity to be loosened. Initially, one of the key objectives of the race fields was to ensure that interstate wagering operators assisted in maintaining the integrity of racing. Now that the race fields regime will be viewed as having been held to be constitutionally valid by the High Court, racing bodies may consider that these arrangements can stand alone. Accordingly, although integrity arrangements will continue in place, we predict that they will not be as interdependent on product fee arrangements as has been the case to date.

The assistance of Nicholas Rozenberg, Solicitor, of Addisons in the preparation of this article is noted and greatly appreciated

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.