Australia: Subcontractors and Defence contracts

In BAE Systems Australia Ltd v Cubic Defence New Zealand Ltd [2011] FCA 1434, the Federal Court was required to consider whether a purported 'termination for convenience' of only part of a Subcontract was valid. The Court also considered whether or not certain implied terms could be excluded by the use of an 'entire agreement' clause.


The respondent, a defence contractor, entered into a contract (the Prime Contract) with the Department of Defence for the supply, operation, support and maintenance of certain information and simulation systems for a training program. It subsequently entered into a contract with the applicant (the Subcontract) for the provision of supplies and support services in relation to the program.

Both contracts provided for works relating to the program to be divided into two phases: an acquisition phase, which had already been completed, and an 'operate and support/manage' (OSM) phase, which was ongoing.

The respondent and the Commonwealth entered into discussions with a view to separating the two phases so that the OSM elements under the Prime Contract could be made the subject of an Australian Standard for Defence Contracting (ASDENFCON) template.The applicant and the respondent began concurrent negotiations about a new flow-down version of the Subcontract to reflect the changes. However, there was disagreement between the parties and the negotiations subsequently broke down.

In late October 2011, the respondent notified the applicant that the Commonwealth had "terminated for convenience that portion of the Prime Contract...that includes all Operations Support and Maintenance (O/S&M) requirements" and purporting to terminate for convenience "all of the corresponding O/S&M requirements" in the Subcontract. in doing so, the respondent relied on clause 12.3.1 in the Subcontract which provided that it may "terminate the contract or reduce the scope of the contract by notifying the Subcontractor in writing" in certain circumstances, including where it had "received a corresponding notice to that effect from the Commonwealth."

When asked by the applicant to provide evidence of a corresponding notice by the Commonwealth, the respondent provided the applicant with a copy of a contract change proposal deed (Deed), executed by the respondent and the Commonwealth. The deed stated that its purpose was to "reduce the scope" of the Prime Contract and to reflect the parties' intentions that the OSM requirements be deleted from it and "form the basis of a separate performance based ASDENFCON contract".

The applicant issued proceedings in the Federal Court claiming a declaration that the respondent's notice purporting to terminate the Subcontract for convenience was unlawful and invalid and that the respondent was therefore in breach of the Subcontract.

The applicant's case relied on two arguments, one based on an alleged breach of express terms in the Subcontract and one based on a breach of certain implied terms. Under the former, it was argued that the respondent was only entitled to rely on clause 12.3.1 to terminate the Subcontract for convenience where it had received a corresponding notice to the same effect from the Commonwealth but that it had not received such a notice. Instead, the applicant claimed that the deed and the new ASDENFCON contract should be characterised as either a "reduction in the scope of the contract" or "a varied form of the contract".

The applicant further claimed that certain terms were implied into the Subcontract, which had been breached by the respondent. These included implied terms that neither party would by its own motion prevent the performance of the Subcontract, that neither party would do anything to destroy the efficacy of the bargain and that each party would do all things to enable the other to have the benefit of the Subcontract.


With respect to the applicant's first argument, the court considered the construction of the termination for convenience clause in the Subcontract. it found that the clause entitled the respondent to either terminate for its convenience or, alternatively, reduce the scope of the Subcontract but that this power "was conditional on the respondent receiving a corresponding notice to that effect from the Commonwealth" (at [40]). The question for The Court was whether the deed between the respondent and the Commonwealth could be characterised as being a corresponding notice of termination.

The Court reviewed the deed and the correspondence between the respondent and the Commonwealth giving rise to it in light of the requirements of the clause. It was held that while the clause referred to "notifying the Subcontractor in writing", no specific form for that notification was required and, as a result, "a corresponding notice from the Commonwealth may be constituted by a deed to which the recipient of the notice is a party" (at [39]).

In characterising the deed, the Court considered both the written provisions of the deed and the substance of what was effected by it. Importantly, Besanko J noted that:

"...the Deed records in writing an act the Commonwealth considered that it was taking. Taking the words at face value, the Commonwealth considered that it was acting under Clause 12.3.1 of the Prime Contract to reduce the scope of the Prime Contract..." (at [44]).

Turning to the substance of what was effected by the Deed, the Court considered whether or not it could be characterised as a termination, variation or reduction in scope of the Prime Contract. the Applicant had submitted that, while couched in terms of Clause 12.3.1, the substance of the deed was in fact to simply vary the terms of the Prime Contract which meant that it could not be relied upon by the respondent.

The Court referred to previous authorities in Morris v Baron & Co [1918] AC 1 and Tallerman & Co Pty Ltd v Nathan's Merchandise (Victoria) Pty Ltd (1957) 98 CLR 93 regarding the distinction between Variation and Rescission. Applying the reasoning from these authorities, The Court held that the Deed had effected a reduction in scope of the Prime Contract rather than a variation of its terms as any new obligations between the parties were now dealt with in a "new free-standing contract". This was so even though minimal substantive obligations remained under the Subcontract as "a reduction to nil is nevertheless a reduction in the scope of the contract" (at [51]).

As a result, despite not receiving a formal notice from the Commonwealth and there being no "termination for convenience", the respondent's actions in issuing the notice to the applicant were held to be consistent with clause 12.3.1 as the Clause also covered reductions in scope.

In relation to the applicant's implied terms argument, the Court noted that the Subcontract contained an 'entire agreement' clause, which provided that the Subcontract document was "an exclusive statement of the parties' contractual obligations". referring to the High Court decision of Hart v Macdonald (1910) 10 CLR 417, which had held that an entire agreement clause did not preclude the implication of a term unless there were express words to that end, the Court found that the relevant clause did not go far enough to exclude the implied terms.

Ultimately, the Court held that the respondent had not breached the implied terms pleaded by the applicant because: (1) there was no evidence that the respondent had any option other than to enter into the Deed and the new ASDENFCON contract with the Commonwealth, (2) the failed negotiations meant that the benefit of the new ASDENFCON terms could not be passed on to the applicant by simply varying the terms of the Subcontract and (3) any terms of the Subcontract, including implied terms, were qualified by the rights and obligations under the 'termination for convenience' clause.


The decision is of interest for government contractors who look to replicate or insert "back-to-back" provisions in their Subcontracts because it provides a good example of how Courts will interpret such provisions. interestingly, the Court appears to have taken a practical approach to the requirement for corresponding notices under flowdown 'termination for convenience' clauses. It appears that the requirement of corresponding notification in writing will not necessarily require a formal notice unless there are express words stating this. Furthermore, it appears that even though notification provided to a Subcontractor is expressed incorrectly, for example as a termination when it is in fact simply a reduction in scope, this will not be invalid provided that the substance of what was intended in the notice is covered by the relevant clause.

The case is also relevant in that it reaffirms the position that 'entire agreement' clauses will not preclude the implication of terms unless those terms are explicitly excluded. Contracting parties should be mindful of this fact and should ensure that if they wish to exclude implied terms such as the obligation not to undermine the efficacy of the contract or the duty of cooperation then they should do so expressly in the contract.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.