Australia: A Turbulent Year for Australian Insurers

Last Updated: 29 February 2012
Article by Robert Crittenden and Travis Luk


In two cases this year, subject exclusion clauses have been read down so as to retain the commercial purpose of the policies.

In Mainstream Aquaculture Pty Ltd v Calliden Insurance Ltd [2011] VSC 286 (Mainstream decision), Mainstream Aquaculture Pty Ltd (Mainstream) conducted a commercial fish breeding business involving the growing and sale of fish and had a business interruption policy with Calliden Insurance Ltd (Calliden). On 26 October 2008, the property experienced a loss of electrical power supply due to the failure of a fuse, which resulted in the death of a large portion of Mainstream's fish stock. Mainstream claimed under clause three of its policy with Calliden, which provided cover for losses arising from the failure of supply from public utilities.

However, the policy contained an exclusion that stated that "we will not pay for... interruptions or interference to your business arising from loss or damage cause by... mechanical, electrical or electronic breakdown or breakages".

Croft J held that the property damage required to trigger the failure of supply provisions would necessarily be mechanical, electrical or electronic in nature. If the electronic breakdown exclusion operated in such circumstances, it would render the failure of supply cover devoid of meaning and clearly out of line with the "commercial purpose" of the parties. Croft J also held that the fuse could constitute property within the meaning of the policy and that it had sustained damage (damage to the electricity provider was a prerequisite to cover under clause 3), despite it "tripping"' as it was designed to.

A similar approach to an exclusion clause was adopted in Major Engineering Pty Ltd v CGU Insurance Ltd [2011] VSCA 226 (Major Engineering decision). Major Engineering Pty Ltd (Major) was initially sued by Timelink Pacific Pty Limited (Timelink). Timelink claimed damages arising out of the failure of two hydraulic cylinders that were supplied by Major and fitted Skandia, a 30-metre ocean racing yacht, owned by Timelink.

After a trial, an appeal, a question being remitted to the trial judge and another appeal, Major was ultimately successful in defending Timelink's claim. Major subsequently sought indemnity for the costs it incurred, claimed at $1,026,010.55, in defending the litigation pursuant to a costs extension clause contained in a policy of Broadform Liability Insurance issued by CGU Insurance Ltd (CGU). Amongst other things, CGU argued that the professional advice and service exclusion applied.

Bongiorno JJA (with whom and Hansen JJA and Kyrou AJA agreed) held that, as a commercial contract, a policy of insurance should be given a business-like interpretation, with attention being paid to the language used by the parties, the commercial circumstances that the document addresses and the objects that it is intended to secure.

With respect to exclusion 19(a), Bongiorno JJA found that Major was not providing a professional service, much less professional advice. It was simply operating its business, as defined (ie the design, manufacture and sale of general engineering and hydraulic equipment). To construe otherwise would be repugnant to the commercial efficacy of the policy. Accordingly, Bongiorno JJA upheld Major's appeal, set aside the trial judge's decision and entered judgment for Major for the declaration sought and the agreed sum.


Imprecise and incomplete communications between a broker and an insurer has led to an insurer being found on risk even though, as the judge observed, "no policy was prepared; no invoice was sent; no premium was paid".

In the Victorian Supreme Court decision of Leading Synthetics Pty Ltd v Adroit Insurance Group Pty Ltd & Anor [2011] VSC 467, Leading Synthetics Pty Ltd (Leading) instructed its broker, Austbrokers, to obtain a policy against the risk that one of its customers, Signum, might fail to pay under its trading account. By 28 April 2008, the broker and the insurer had negotiated all essential terms. Specifically, in its email of 28 April 2008, Artadius sought confirmation from the broker that the policy commencement date was 1 April 2008. Austbrokers replied that the date was acceptable.

A few days prior to 28 April 2008, Atradius sent an "indication of terms" document, expressed to be "without commitment on the part of Atradius until such time we provide you with written confirmation that we are on risk for your transaction and agree to issue a policy". Atradius argued that the email exchange of 28 April 2008 did not constitute written confirmation that it was on risk.

On 5 May 2008, the broker emailed Atradius about various risks it was then placing for Leading and noted that the cover for the Signum risk was "placed awaiting outcome on others prior to processing". The email sought Atradius' confirmation of that but when Atradius replied, it did not address the Signum risk. There matters lay until November 2008, when warnings of Signum's impending failure rose.

The only issue in dispute was whether there was an intention to create legal relations.

Imprecise and incomplete communications between a broker and an insurer has led to an insurer being found on risk.

Macaulay J found that while Atradius had conveyed that it did not wish to be bound by contract until it confirmed such in writing, he did not believe the written confirmation had to be in any particular form of words. For other credit risk covers, Atradius had used language to confirm when it was on risk, such as "the policy set to live" or "cover commences". In considering all the circumstances including the sense of urgency that characterised the final stage of negotiation, his Honour found that Atradius' email of 28 April 2008 referring to a commencement date of 1 April 2008 constituted the insurer's advice that risk had commenced. The court found that even if there had been no policy in place, Atradius was estopped from denying that such a contract of insurance had been entered into because it had induced the assumption that insurance had been placed.

Atradius also argued that Leading's failure to disclose Signum's worsening payment record was a material non-disclosure, however that argument was rejected.

Therefore, despite the insurer issuing no policy, no invoice and no premium being paid, Atradius was ordered to pay the insured loss of $720,000.

Herde v Oxford Aviation Academy (Australia) Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 385 is of relevance to insurers who might sometimes fail to consult with their insured about the terms on which they settle subrogated claims. Oxford Aviation Academy (Australia) Pty Ltd (Oxford) was the owner of an aircraft that crashed on a test flight, fatally injuring the pilot and significantly damaging a plane owned by the plaintiff. The plaintiff's insurer, QBE, settled its claim against the defendant's insurer, Hemisphere, for damage to the plane in the amount of $73,408 under the terms of a release. Oxford was a releasee, however any liability the pilot may have was not considered. This would not normally have been a problem, but Hemisphere was unable to pay QBE and QBE therefore obtained summary judgment directly against Oxford for the $73,408 owing to it.

Oxford appealed, arguing that the trial judge had incorrectly entered summary judgment. The sole issue on appeal was whether the defendant's insurer had authority to enter into the release on his behalf.

In the appeal, the plaintiff relied upon clause five of the Hemisphere policy, which stated:

"The company shall be entitled... to take absolute control of all negotiations and proceedings and in the name of the Insured to settle, defend or pursue any claim".

Despite the meaning and effect of that clause being clear, Giles JA held that "it cannot be said that clause five is so obvious a source of authority that the judge came to the correct result". Giles JA held that Hemisphere's failure to investigate whether the defendant or the pilot had both incurred liability for the damage suffered by the plaintiff potentially demonstrated conduct not taken in the common interest of the insurer and insured and therefore arguably not on the authority given by the defendant to Hemisphere.


In Moore v The National Mutual Life Association of Australia Limited [2011] NSWSC 411, Dr Moore commenced proceedings against The National Mutual Life Associate of Australia Limited (National Mutual), claiming benefits he did not receive between 2002 to age 65 pursuant to a policy of life insurance he obtained from National Mutual. National Mutual cross-claimed against Dr Moore, seeking to avoid the contract for fraudulent misrepresentations and non-disclosure and sought repayment of amounts it did pay to Dr Moore between 1995 and 2002.

At the time the insurance application form was completed, Dr Moore represented that:

  • He was a self-employed psychiatrist
  • His annual income was $90,000
  • He had never received advice or treatment for a mental disorder
  • He had not used or injected himself with any drug not prescribed by a doctor.

In fact, Dr Moore was a psychiatric registrar earning only $52,000 (at the time) with a long history of depression and intravenous injection of pethidine. He had been suspended from the register of medical practitioners in Tasmania, discharged from the Australian Army for misappropriating pethidine reserves and charged on two occasions in connection with the use of pethidine.

Ball J found that Dr. Moore was guilty of each of the misrepresentations and that the misrepresentations were made "with the intention that they be acted upon in the knowledge they were false" and therefore fraudulently. He held that pursuant to section 29 of the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth), National Mutual was entitled to avoid the contract.

As to whether National Mutual had affirmed the contract, Ball J noted that Dr Moore had to prove that National Mutual made an unequivocal election between inconsistent rights, which was communicated to Dr Moore and made with knowledge of all relevant facts. Ball J held that the mere payment of benefits with some knowledge of Dr Moore's drug use and depression was insufficient in that regard. However, he did hold that given Dr Moore would have mitigated his living expenses or tried to obtain alternative employment had the benefits not been paid, he had "altered his position" and that it would be unjust to require him to refund the payments.

The claim and cross-claim were dismissed.


The commercial approach of the courts to the interpretation of exclusion clauses, as was demonstrated in the Mainstream and Major Engineering decisions, will often result in an interpretation that is favourable to the insured. However, when an exclusion clause is unambiguous and in line with the commercial purpose of the insurance contract, the courts seem prepared to strictly apply the exclusion against the insured. Insurers should be aware of these decisions when drafting exclusions clauses.

© DLA Piper

This publication is intended as a general overview and discussion of the subjects dealt with. It is not intended to be, and should not used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. DLA Piper Australia will accept no responsibility for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this publication.

DLA Piper Australia is part of DLA Piper, a global law firm, operating through various separate and distinct legal entities. For further information, please refer to

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.