Australia: Construction Law Review

Last Updated: 29 February 2012
Article by Rohan Bennett and Kristy Cappellotto

2011 saw developments in the areas of security of payment claims and contracting out of proportionate liability.


Jurisdictional error usually occurs when a decision-maker makes a decision outside the limits of his or her functions or powers conferred on them. In the context of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) (SoP Act), the relevant decision-maker is an adjudicator hearing security of payment applications.

In 2010, the New South Wales Court of Appeal widened the possible grounds of review of an adjudicator's decision to include jurisdictional error. Previously, jurisdictional error had been ruled out as a ground for reviewing an adjudicator's decision.

It all started with the High Court's feisty decision of Kirk v Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales [2010] HCA. That case had nothing to do with building payment claims, but it set the stage for a series of cases contesting adjudicators' decisions. The High Court ruled that a state's Supreme Court must retain its power to provide relief in the event of "jurisdictional error" and that any legislation to the contrary is unconstitutional.

Soon after in relation to an adjudication under the SoP Act, the New South Wales Court of Appeal was asked to decide whether an adjudicator's decision was valid in Chase Oyster Bar Pty Ltd v Hamo Industries Pty Ltd [2010] NSWCA 190 (Chase decision). The case concerned time limits under the SoP Act. Hamo Industries had not observed a time limit and Chase argued that the adjudicator therefore had no jurisdiction to hear the security of payment application.

The Court of Appeal agreed with Chase and said that the time limit issue put the matter beyond the jurisdiction of the adjudicator. Therefore, to proceed to hear the matter was a jurisdictional error by the adjudicator and was a ground for review of the decision by the Supreme Court. The case marked a turning point because previously, in Brodyn Pty Ltd v Davenport (2004) 61 NSWLR 421, jurisdictional error had been ruled out as a ground for reviewing an adjudicator's decision.

While the Chase decision indicates that jurisdictional error can be a ground to review an adjudicator's decision, it is probably not surprising that 2011 has seen a spate of cases that highlight the difficulty in distinguishing between jurisdictional error and non-jurisdictional error and the underlying tension surrounding state Supreme Court interventions into statutory decision-making powers, which are designed to be final.

The way in which the Chase decision has subsequently been applied or distinguished in several cases around Australia demonstrates this difficulty.

In Thiess Pty Ltd v MCC Mining [2011] WASC 80, the Supreme Court of Western Australia considered jurisdictional issues arising from the Construction Contracts Act 2004 (WA) (CC Act). As in the Chase decision, it was argued that as the claim had been made out of time, the adjudicator had no jurisdiction to hear the dispute. However, the adjudicator refused to dismiss the adjudication application. In finding that the failure to bring an application within time was not a jurisdictional fact, the court found that Thiess was entitled to enforce the judgment, effectively upholding the adjudicator's decision. In particular, the court considered that the conclusion in the Chase decision that it was for the court to determine whether the adjudication application had been made in time does not apply to judicial review of a decision under s 31(2) (a) of the CC Act.

In Olympia Group v Hansen Yuncken [2011] NSWSC 165, the adjudicator concluded that he did not have jurisdiction to determine a dispute because the work was performed outside New South Wales. The Supreme Court of New South Wales agreed the adjudicator had no jurisdiction because the contract did not deal with construction work in New South Wales, as required by the SoP Act.

In H M Australia Holdings v Edelbrand [2011] NSWSC 604, it was argued that the defendant's contract was for the coordination of services, not for construction work, and that as such the adjudicator had no jurisdiction. The Supreme Court of New South Wales agreed and held that "the adjudicator made a basic and essential error in proceeding to a determination in the absence of a construction contract".

In Perrinepod Pty Ltd v Georgiou Building Pty Ltd [2011] WASCA 217, the Court of Appeal of Western Australia considered a case where an adjudicator decided not to dismiss an application under the CC Act but to make a determination on its merits. It was argued that the matter was too complex for the adjudicator, but the adjudicator disagreed. The Court of Appeal found that there was no right of review of a decision by an adjudicator not to dismiss an adjudication application and dismissed the appeal. The adjudicator's decision stood.

In VK Property Group Pty Ltd and Ors v Conias Properties Pty Ltd and Anor [2011] QSC 54, the Supreme Court of Queensland had to determine whether an adjudication made under the Building and Construction Industry Payments Act 2004 (QLD) should be set aside by reason of numerous alleged jurisdictional errors. No jurisdictional errors were found and the application to dismiss the adjudication was dismissed. Again, the adjudicator's decision stood.


Proportionate liability continues to create difficulties in the construction industry, particularly in jurisdictions such as Tasmania, New South Wales and Western Australia where it is permitted to contract out of proportionate liability legislation. Contracting out of proportionate liability legislation can lead to serious gaps in insurance cover. Proportionate liability law continues to develop and it is timely to revisit a little-heralded case in Tasmania.

In Aquagenics Pty Ltd v Break O'Day Council [2010] TASFC 3, the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Tasmania considered whether a principal (Break O'Day) and contractor (Aquagenics) had contracted out of the proportionate liability legislation, even in circumstances where they did not specifically intend to at the time of entering the contract. The contract between the parties provided for arbitration in the event of a dispute. Aquagenics issued court proceedings (since its position was that the contract had been repudiated) and Break O'Day successfully applied for a stay of the court proceedings so that the parties could arbitrate. Aquagenics appealed the stay to the Full Court. Aquagenics argued that the court proceeding should proceed because the claim involved complex questions in relation to proportionate liability of sub-contactors.

The Full Court dismissed the appeal, and held that:

  • The parties had contracted out of the proportionate liability legislation, despite there not being any specific exclusion to that effect in the contract.
  • There does not need to be an express provision between the parties to abandon a right under the Act, or that it even needs to include a reference to that Act.
  • The contract "made provision for each parties' rights, obligations and liabilities in relation to any matter to which the Civil Liability Act applied", which is all the Act requires in order to "contract out".

Having removed the proportionate liability obstacle, the parties were entitled to proceed to arbitration. While there was no need for the court to find whether proportionate liability would apply to arbitration proceedings, it gave a clear message that it was most unlikely. This was primarily based on the presumption that other parties could not be joined to the arbitration.

© DLA Piper

This publication is intended as a general overview and discussion of the subjects dealt with. It is not intended to be, and should not used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. DLA Piper Australia will accept no responsibility for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this publication.

DLA Piper Australia is part of DLA Piper, a global law firm, operating through various separate and distinct legal entities. For further information, please refer to

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.