Australia: Is recovery by directors of defence costs under D&O policies on the rocks? - Implications of Steigrad v Bridgecorp -

Last Updated: 11 November 2011
Article by Anthony Addison and Li-Jean Chew

The recent decision of the High Court of New Zealand in Steigrad v Bridgecorp 1 (Bridgecorp decision) has caused a stir amongst directors.  It raises concerns over the recoverability by directors under traditional directors and officers insurance policies (D&O policies) for their legal costs in defending a claim against them.

The Bridgecorp decision also raises the question of how the traditional D&O policy can be restructured to give greater certainty that the D&O insurer will cover and advance defence costs to a director.

In the Bridgecorp decision, the High Court of New Zealand found that the directors of the collapsed Bridgecorp Group could not access the funds under their D&O policy to meet the costs of defending claims made against them for breach of directors' duties, as a result of a statutory charge that had arisen over the insurance money in favour of the claimants pursuant to section 9 of the Law Reform Act 1936 (NZ) (NZ Act).

As there are laws in NSW, ACT and the Northern Territory which are on terms substantially identical to and have been modelled on section 9 of NZ Act, the implications of the Bridgecorp decision are important for Australian directors and officers.

How did the Bridgecorp decision arise?


The Bridgecorp Group (Group) was placed into receivership in 2007. The directors of the Group (Directors) faced numerous civil and criminal claims, including a potential civil claim by the receivers of the Group (Receivers) for more than $450 million for breach of their common law and statutory duties to the Group companies.

Under the Group's D&O policy (Policy), the Directors were insured against liability for both damages and compensation as well as defence costs up to a limit of $20 million in aggregate.

It was clear from the outset that the Receivers' claim against the Directors exceeded the Policy limit. Further, given the multitude of claims instituted against the Directors, it was clear that if any reimbursement was made to the Directors under the Policy for their costs in defending those claims, this would significantly reduce the insurance money available to compensate claimants (including the Receivers), if their actions against the Directors were successful.

Accordingly, the Receivers sought to assert a first charge over all money payable under the Policy in reliance on section 9 of the NZ Act and argued that, by operation of this statutory charge, the Receivers' claim over any money payable under the Policy had priority over any payments for defence costs claimed by the Directors under the Policy.

The Directors sought a declaration from the High Court of New Zealand that the statutory charge did not prevent its insurer from reimbursing the Directors for their defence costs.


On an analysis of section 9 of the NZ Act, Justice Lang of the High Court found, having regard foremost to the words of the provision and then its object and purpose, that a statutory charge had arisen in favour of the Receivers over all money payable under the Policy (as the amount of the Receivers' claim was greater than the level of cover under the Policy). His Honour also found that as section 9(1) of the NZ Act stated that the charge arises "on the happening of the event giving rise to the claim for damages or compensation", the statutory charge came into existence well before any liability was declared to exist, or was quantified, by a court.  In this case, the charge in favour of the Receivers arose at the time the Bridgecorp Group collapsed.

Lang J further found that:

  1. the fact that the quantum of the claim had yet to be determined would not prevent the charge from coming into existence; and
  2. the charge applied both to insurance money that was payable and to that which may become payable.

Although the charge remained conditional until the establishment by the Receivers that the Directors were liable for a quantified sum and the establishment that the Directors were entitled to cover under the Policy, the charge prevented the Directors from having access to the Policy to meet their defence costs.

On the one hand, Lang J recognised that this result may be harsh, and even unfair, for the Directors given that the Policy was taken out at least in part for the specific purpose of meeting the Directors' defence costs.

On the other hand however, his Honour pointed out that the decision fell squarely within the underlying intent of section 9, namely, to ensure a more effective procedure for enforcing a plaintiff's entitlements against a defendant by allowing the plaintiff to have direct access to the defendant's insurance fund ahead of the defendant.  In this case, if the Directors were able to obtain access to funds under the Policy to meet their defence costs, the pool of funds available to meet civil claims would be significantly depleted and this would have the effect of defeating the purpose of the statutory charge.

Lang J noted that, had the Receivers' claim been less than the Policy limit, the position is likely to have been different:

"In those circumstances, the charge could only extend to the likely amount of the claim and its associated costs. The insured may therefore be able to gain access to the policy to meet defence costs ."

His Honour made clear that section 9 does not give the Receivers wider rights against the Directors than they would otherwise have:

"the claimant does not become entitled to recover a greater sum than that already recoverable".2

Rather, the operation of section 9 seeks to deter directors from pursuing meaningless litigation and escalating defence costs at the expense of claimants and entering into corruptive arrangements with the insurer whereby the insurer pays an agreed sum to the director in return for a discharge from any further liability to indemnify them under the policy.

What are the implications of the case?

Most D&O policies are premised on the company first indemnifying a director against liabilities incurred by them in their capacity as a director before the director is indemnified under the D&O policy.  Having indemnified a director, the company would then claim under the company reimbursement section of the D&O policy to be reimbursed.

A typical deed of indemnity in favour of a director usually includes a right for an indemnified director to receive an advancement of defence costs from the company.  Where the company is solvent and has the ability to honour its indemnity, the Bridgecorp decision is unlikely to have much practical significance for directors and officers.  This is because, even if the company cannot recover from the D&O insurer, the company will have to meet its indemnity to the director from its own resources.

The Bridgecorp decision is of particular significance in the circumstance where the company is insolvent or financially unable to meet its obligations under the deed of indemnity in favour of the directors and therefore the directors have to seek cover from the D&O policy.  In such a situation, the Bridgecorp decision highlights how directors can lose the entire benefit of cover for their defence costs where:

  1. there is no separate cover, or separate insurance limit, under the D&O policy for defence costs and for claims against the director for damages and compensation; and
  2. the policy limit is insufficient to cover both outgoings.

Further, the language of section 9 (and its Australian equivalents) is broad enough to extend to any contract of insurance (not just D&O policies). Therefore, the Bridgecorp decision could apply to any insurance policy where cover for the insured's liability for damages and compensation and for the insured's other costs fall within a single policy limit.

What should companies do in the meantime?

The Bridgecorp decision is currently on appeal in NZ and indeed, may not be followed in Australia. However, until a similar issue is considered in Australian courts, it would be prudent for companies to review their D&O and other insurance policies to see where the Bridgecorp decision could affect those policies and consider:

  1. the adequacy of the limits of liability under those policies;
  2. obtaining stand-alone cover for defence costs (and other costs), separate from cover for claims for damages and compensation; and/or
  3. where separate insurance products are not available, establishing separate limits under the one policy for liabilities for damages and compensation on the one hand, and for defence and other costs on the other.

Companies should also consult their insurance brokers as to the full range of insurance products available and how separating insurance covers may affect aggregate policy limits and premiums.

It is also timely for companies and directors to review the adequacy of their directors' and officers' indemnities.

The assistance of Belle Jing, Solicitor, of Addisons in the preparation of this article is noted and greatly appreciated


1 HC Auckland, CIV-2011-404-611. 15 September 2011, Lang J.

2 Bridgecorp decision at [23], citing FAI General Insurance Co Ltd v Blundell and Brown Ltd [1994] 1 NZLR 11 at 17 (Richardson J).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Li-Jean Chew
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.