Australia: Directors denied access to defence costs under their D&O policy

Last Updated: 11 October 2011
Article by Dean Newell

Focus: D&O insurance; defence costs; charge in respect of potential claims
Services: Insurance
Industry Focus: Insurance

Steigrad & Ors v BFSL 2007 Ltd & Ors HC AK CIV-2011-404-611 [2011] NZHC 1037 (15 September 2011)

In brief

A recent decision of the High Court of New Zealand, if followed in Australia, has serious repercussions for all directors and officers.

The receivers of various Bridgecorp companies asserted that they had claims against the Bridgecorp directors ("directors") for various breaches of directors' duties. They estimated the damages to be in excess of NZ$450 million. Those directors were also being prosecuted by the NZ equivalent of ASIC and were facing an imminent trial. They wanted to access their NZ$20 million D&O policy to fund their legal costs of the criminal trial. The receivers however asserted that they had a "charge" over the insurance proceeds that may be payable for their claim, pursuant to the NZ equivalent of s6 of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW).

The Court held that, as unfortunate as the result may be for the directors, the charge stood in favour of the receivers, such that the directors could not fund their defence costs through their D&O policy.


The Bridgecorp group of finance companies ("Bridgecorp") collapsed and were placed into receivership in June 2007 owing investors nearly NZ$500 million. The directors face numerous criminal and civil claims following the collapse, including civil and criminal proceedings instituted by the NZ Securities Commission. In addition, it is likely that the directors will also face civil claims from the Bridgecorp companies in receivership.

At the time of the collapse, there were in existence 2 policies of insurance which could potentially provide cover for the directors' defence costs; firstly, a statutory liability policy ("SL policy") providing cover of NZ$2 million; secondly, a D&O policy with QBE with an overall policy limit of NZ$20 million and a limit for advance payment of defence costs (where cover has not been confirmed) of NZ$500,000.

The SL policy limit was exhausted first and the directors then called upon QBE to fund their further defence costs. In June 2009 however, Bridgecorp advised QBE that they asserted a charge over monies payable under the D&O policy for amounts they intended to claim from the directors in civil proceedings. It was alleged that the charge arose by virtue of s9 of the Law Reform Act 1936 (NZ) ("LR Act") which creates a charge in favour of a claimant over monies that may be payable under any insurance policy held by the person against whom the claim is made. As a result, QBE refused to make any payments in respect of defence costs unless agreement could be reached as to the allocation of funds under the policy. No such agreement could be reached and the directors sought a declaration that s9 of the LR Act did not prevent QBE from making payments in respect of defence costs under the policy.

The New Zealand High Court's decision

Section 9 of the LR Act is as follows:

"9 Amount of liability to be charge on insurance money payable against that liability:

(1) If any person (hereinafter in this Part of this Act referred to as the insured) has, whether before or after the passing of this Act, entered into a contract of insurance by which he is indemnified against liability to pay any damages or compensation, the amount of his liability shall, on the happening of the event giving rise to the claim for damages or compensation, and notwithstanding that the amount of such liability may not then have been determined, be a charge on all insurance money that is or may become payable in respect of that liability.

(2) If, on the happening of the event giving rise to any claim for damages or compensation as aforesaid, the insured has died insolvent or is bankrupt or, in the case of a corporation, is being wound up, or if any subsequent bankruptcy or winding up of the insured is deemed to have commenced not later than the happening of that event, the provisions of the last preceding subsection shall apply notwithstanding the insolvency, bankruptcy, or winding up of the insured.

(3) Every charge created by this section shall have priority over all other charges affecting the said insurance money, and where the same insurance money is subject to 2 or more charges by virtue of this Part of this Act those charges shall have priority between themselves in the order of the dates of the events out of which the liability arose, or, if such charges arise out of events happening on the same date, they shall rank equally between themselves.

(4) Every such charge as aforesaid shall be enforceable by way of an action against the insurer in the same way and in the same Court as if the action were an action to recover damages or compensation from the insured; and in respect of any such action and of the judgment given therein the parties shall, to the extent of the charge, have the same rights and liabilities, and the Court shall have the same powers, as if the action were against the insured. Provided that, except where the provisions of subsection (2) of this section apply, no such action shall be commenced in any Court except with the leave of that Court.

(5) Such an action may be brought although judgment has been already recovered against the insured for damages or compensation in respect of the same matter.

(6) Any payment made by an insurer under the contract of insurance without actual notice of the existence of any such charge shall to the extent of that payment be a valid discharge to the insurer, notwithstanding anything in this Part of this Act contained.

(7) No insurer shall be liable under this Part of this Act for any sum beyond the limits fixed by the contract of insurance between himself and the insured."

It should be noted that s6 of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW) ("LRMP Act") is in almost identical terms to s9 of the LR Act. His Honour, Lang J, referred to various Australian and New Zealand authorities1 and noted that the purpose of these sections was to ensure a bona fide claimant is not deprived of access to insurance monies due to a number of possible factors, including the insolvency of the insured, the application of the insurance monies to other debts or even a corrupt bargain between the insured and the insurer. His Honour also noted dicta to the effect that s9 of the LR Act 'alters the priority of claims against the assets of such an insured'.2

His Honour considered the nature of the charge and held that:

  • the charge comes into existence well before liability is declared to exist by a court or other tribunal (in this case the charge arose when the Bridgecorp group collapsed)
  • the fact that the quantum of the claim is yet to be determined will not prevent a charge from coming into existence
  • the charge applies both to insurance money that is payable and to that which may become payable, and
  • there are clearly limits to the scope and application of the charge.3

Lang J then considered whether the charge would prevent the directors from having access to the D&O policy to meet their defence costs. He referred to the case of National Insurance Company of New Zealand Ltd v Wilson4 where the court had concluded that an insurer was not entitled to deduct defence costs from an amount payable to an injured employee on behalf of an insured, as to do so could allow an insurer to 'whittle down its liability to the insured by unnecessary and extravagant litigation, and, in the long run, the employee would lose the security for compensation he would otherwise enjoy by virtue of the policy.' This was so even though the policy limit was 'inclusive of costs'.

In this case Bridgecorp submitted that, were the directors to be allowed to recover defence costs under the policy, the same result would follow – that is, that the reimbursement of defence costs would significantly reduce the amount available under the D&O policy for civil claimants, thus rendering the charge under s9 largely ineffective. Lang J agreed with this submission. He then considered 2 further authorities5 which, though not completely analagous to the current case (in that they did not involve claims against directors enlivening D&O policies), generally supported the proposition that payments made in respect of defence costs or other payments made 'after the charge has descended' under the contract to the insured6 cannot be deducted from monies owing to a claimant pursuant to the contract of insurance.

Accordingly, Lang J held that, even though the charge remained conditional (on Bridgecorp establishing liability on the part of the directors and the directors establishing entitlement to cover under their D&O policy), the charge operated to prevent the directors from accessing the D&O policy to meet their defence costs. His Honour reached this conclusion by noting:

  • s9(1) charges "all insurance money" that is or may become payable
  • the claim by Bridgecorp against the directors was for a sum significantly in excess of the policy limit,
  • and any payment made to the directors in respect of defence costs would have the effect of reducing the fund available for the civil claimants, thereby rendering the charge created by s9 ineffective, or requiring QBE to pay defence costs in addition to the overall policy limit.

Conclusion and comment

Lang J correctly noted that his conclusion that the charge created by s9 of the LR Act prevented the directors from accessing their D&O policy to meet defence costs produced 'some unsatisfactory consequences'. This is especially so given that one of the main reasons companies and directors purchase D&O insurance is to provide cover for defence costs in relation to any civil or criminal proceedings instituted against them.

As Lang J observed, the problem lies in the in the fact the Bridgecorp 'elected to take out an insurance policy that provided cover for both defence costs and claims for damages and compensation' whereas an SL policy providing greater cover for defence costs could have been selected. The issue also arises due to the fact that Bridgecorp's claim exceeded the policy limit. Difficulties in the application of the charge may arise where claims are less than the policy limit.

Standard D&O policies on the market today provide cover for defence costs, damages and compensation in the one policy, with the one policy limit. As a result of this decision, until there is judicial clarification in New South Wales, directors may now have to consider finding and purchasing separate cover for defence costs only in order to quarantine that cover from any claim for damages and compensation and the charge arising from s6 of the LRMP Act (NSW). At least in NSW, such products are yet to be developed, although this should not prove problematic. The main difficulty will be in deciding upon the amount of cover required and pricing that cover.

At the time of publishing, the directors are still in time to appeal this decision of the NZ High Court.


1Grimson v Aviation & General (Underwriting) Agents Pty Ltd , (1991) 25 NSWLR 422; FAI (NZ) General Insurance Co Ltd v Blundell and Brown Ltd [1994] 1 NZLR 11 (CA); Ludgater Holdings Ltd v Gerling Australia Insurance Co Pty Ltd [2010] 3 NZLR 713 (SC); McMillan v Mannix (1993) 31 NSWLR 538 (CA); Body Corporate No 195843 v North Shore City Council (The Grange) [2011] 2 NZLR 222 (CA).

2 Ludgater at [21].

3 See s9(6) LR Act – "Any payment made by an insurer under the contract of insurance without actual notice of the existence of any such charge shall to the extent of that payment be a valid discharge to the insurer, notwithstanding anything in this Part of this Act contained."; Also, where the insurer establishes that it is entitled to disclaim liability under the policy or where there is a vitiating factor in its formation, no charge will exist – Bailey v NSW Medical Defence Union Ltd [1995] HCA 28 at 449.

4 [1941] NZLR 639 (SC)

5 Pattinson v General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation Ltd [1941] NZLR 1029. and Bailey v New South Wales Medical Defence Union Ltd [1995] HCA 28

6 McHugh and Gummow JJ in Bailey at 449.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.