Australia: Successful contribution against tow truck company for negligent advice - Wagga Truck Towing Pty Limited v O'Toole; IAG Limited t/as NRMA Insurance v O'Toole [2011] NSWCA 191

Curwoods Case Note
Last Updated: 25 July 2011
Article by Andrew Parker

Judgment date: 15 July 2011

Wagga Truck Towing Pty Limited v O'Toole; IAG Limited t/as NRMA Insurance v O'Toole [2011] NSWCA 191

Court of Appeal1

In Brief

  • Contribution may be sought from a third party where the negligent advice of that third party has caused the plaintiff to sustain injuries in a motor accident.
  • A driver may also be found liable where his/her actions, have partially caused injury to the plaintiff, notwithstanding the injury would not have occurred but for the negligent third party advice.


The plaintiff, Mr O'Toole, brought proceedings against Wagga Truck Towing (Wagga) and Mr Russell (insured by NRMA Insurance) in respect of injuries he sustained in Towing an accident on 28 October 2002.

On the day of the accident, the plaintiff and Mr Russell were returning from a race meeting in Melbourne, when Mr Russell's truck (which was carrying a V8 Holden race car) broke down on the highway.

Mr Russell proceeded to park the truck on the side of the highway (on an incline), placed the truck in second gear and then put the hand brake on. Following that, Mr Russell called Wagga Towing and spoke to Mr Cool. Mr Cool, after being told by Mr Russell that the pair were returning home from a race meeting, that there were tools available, and that Mr Russell had assistance (the plaintiff), requested that Mr Russell remove the tail-shaft from the truck so as to not delay the tow truck when it arrived.

A short time following that conversation, Mr Russell began to remove the front bumper bar. Prior to getting under the truck, the plaintiff asked Mr Russell whether the vehicle was "safe". Mr Russell replied that the handbrake was on.

The plaintiff then went under the truck, removed the nuts and bolts and proceeded to remove the tail-shaft. Almost immediately upon the tail-shaft being removed, the truck rolled forward, running over the plaintiff and causing him serious injuries.

Primary Judge's Findings

Neither Mr Cool nor Mr Russell gave evidence at the hearing. Accordingly, a number of inferences were drawn from the evidence tendered, which included various Statements obtained by both parties' investigators.

The primary judge held that the removal of the tail-shaft meant that the handbrake was no longer effective. He found that Wagga Towing and Mr Russell breached the duty of care owed to the plaintiff and apportioned liability 70% to Mr Russell and 30% to Wagga Towing.

Specifically, the trial judge held that Mr Russell was significantly negligent, noting that he was "quite adept" at mechanical matters, parked the vehicle on an incline, and directed the at mechanical matters, parked the vehicle on an incline, and directed the plaintiff to go under the vehicle and remove the tail-shaft, without first chocking the wheels.  

The critical findings against Mr Russell (for the purposes of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act (MAC Act)) were:

  1. Mr Russell was the driver and was also the person in charge of the vehicle.
  2. His fault was in the use or operation of the vehicle; that is, his fault concerned the parking and maintenance of the vehicle.
  3. The plaintiff's injuries were caused by the vehicle running out of control.

Liability was also established against Wagga Towing due to the fact that the court accepted that Mr Cool was an expert in the field of towing and provided advice to Mr Russell, without first warning Mr Russell of the dangers in performing the action requested.

Issue On Appeal  

Both Mr Russell and Wagga Towing appealed the primary judge's findings.

NRMA submitted the primary judge erred in:

  1. Certain factual findings.
  2. Finding fault on the part of Mr Russell.
  3. Finding that fault on the part of Mr Russell fell within the MAC Act.

Wagga Towing submitted that the trial judge's judgment was infected by a number of errors, which included that:

  1. the trial judge should not have found that Wagga Towing knew or ought to have known that disconnecting the tail-shaft would render the parking brake inoperative; 
  2. the trial judge should not have been satisfied that this was something that the Wagga Towing knew, or ought to have known and that Mr Russell (being the owner/driver of the vehicle) was or might be unaware of;
  3. in all the circumstances, Wagga Towing had no duty to warn of the risk that disconnecting the tail-shaft may render the parking brake inoperative.

Hodgson JA delivered the leading judgment with which McColl JA agreed.2

The court held that the facts established the parking brake of the truck did not engage directly with the wheels, but rather somewhere with the transmission of the wheels and the engine.3 Further, it held that if this was the case with the subject truck, then "plainly it could have been the case with other trucks".4

The court said it was open to the primary judge to infer from the circumstances and the evidence given at the trial that Mr Cool was a person who was very familiar with the towing of trucks and the effect of removing a tail-shaft. As such:

"in circumstances where there was no evidence that trucks generally have parking brakes operating directly on the wheels, an inference was open that the feature of this truck, that its parking brake operated on the transmission, was a feature shared with other trucks, and that this was known to Mr Cool."5

In addition, Hodgson JA inferred from the conversation between Mr Cool and Mr Russell (which was tendered by way of an investigative Statement by Mr Russell) that the removal of the tail-shaft was not something with which Mr Russell was familiar.

Hodgson JA found (for the purpose of s 5B of the Civil Liability Act) that:

  1. Mr Cool should have known that there was a risk if he did not alert Mr Russell that the removal of the tail-shaft might disable the parking brake and gears, and thereby allow the truck to run out of control;
  2. whilst, the likelihood of this happening might have been small, the consequences were "horrendous", so the risk was not insignificant;
  3. a reasonable person in Mr Cool's position would have alerted Mr Russell to the risk, noting the consequences that may result if the risk eventuated, and noting the minimal effort in giving the relevant precaution.

The court also held that neither Mr Russell nor the plaintiff were in a class of persons who might reasonably be expected to be aware of the risk that the parking brake would be disabled. Accordingly, Stevens v Gienko6 was  distinguished.

As such, the appeal failed.

 Negligence of Mr Russell

The court accepted NRMA's submission that the primary judge erred in finding that Mr Russell had greater mechanical expertise than the plaintiff. It was accepted that whilst Mr Russell raced a car and had a shed to put the car into, the evidence did not suggest that he did any substantial work on the car, other than to perform unspecified work with friends.

In rejecting NRMA's submissions to the contrary, the court held that Mr Russell implicitly directed the plaintiff to disconnect the tail-shaft. This was implied by the fact that the plaintiff was an employee of Mr Russell (although was not actually engaged in his usual employment duties) and had travelled to the race meeting to assist Mr Russell (as he had done in the past) with various tasks.7

Hodgson JA held that a reasonable person in Mr Russell's position:

"would have appreciated that disconnecting the tail-shaft would remove any braking effect from the engagement of the gears, and (even without any actual knowledge that disconnecting the tail-shaft would disable the parking brake) would have appreciated that to undo bolts under the truck, on an incline, without chocking the wheels, was a risky  ndertaking."8

In terms of s 5B of the Civil Liability Act:

  1. Mr Russell should have appreciated that there was some risk even though he did not appreciate the precise risk which might eventuate.
  2. The likelihood of the risk eventuating, noting the horrendous consequences if the risk did eventuate, rendered the risk not insignificant.
  3. A reasonable person in Mr Russell's position would not have directed the plaintiff to remove the tail-shaft, without at least taking the simple precaution of chocking the wheels.

The court also held that Mr Russell was the owner of the vehicle and the injury was caused during the vehicle running out of control.

In considering whether the fault of Mr Russell was "in the use or operation of the vehicle", Hodgson JA held that:

"Although the vehicle was parked at least half an hour before the fault occurred, the change in circumstances meant that the vehicle became inadequately parked, in the sense of being insufficiently held in its stopped position. In my opinion, this does mean that the fault was in the parking of the vehicle. Also, the arranging and preparing for the towing of the vehicle was part of the process of affecting the maintenance of the vehicle; and in my opinion the fault was also a fault in the maintenance of the vehicle." 9

Accordingly, Mr Russell's appeal against primary liability was also dismissed.

However, notwithstanding the above, NRMA effectively submitted that the apportionment with which the trial judge originally made was infected by the erroneous finding that Mr Russell was "quite adept at mechanical matters".

The court agreed and increased the liability of Wagga Towing to 50%. Hodgson JA said:

"Mr Cool was the expert who initiated the process without warning; while Mr Russell on the site, knew of the slope and knew that the vehicle was not chocked, but still directed Mr O'Toole to undo bolts under the truck." 10


Insurers should be aware that in appropriate cases a liability to contribute will arise, especially when a driver has deferred to the expertise of a third party and relied on that advice. However, it is important to note that a driver will still be liable even if he/she defers to the expertise of a third party if he/she has been negligent in his/her own actions.


1 Giles JA, Hodgson JA and McColl JA

2 Giles JA substantially agreed although preferred not to rest fault with the parking of the vehicle – see para 1.

3 The Court of Appeal commented that this was common ground on the appeal.

4 Hodgson JA at 23

5 Hodgson JA at 25

6 [2011] NSWCA 53

7 It was found that the plaintiff did no more than help with minor incidental tasks such as changing stickers on the car, washing the car and unloading spare wheels.

8 per Hodgson JA at 42

9 per Hodgson JA at 46

10 per Hodgson JA at 51

Ranked No 1 - Australia's fastest growing law firm' (Legal Partnership Survey, The Australian July 2010)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.