Australia: Sparking a divide in defining ‘damage’ in business interruption claims?

Mainstream Aquaculture Pty Ltd v Calliden Insurance Ltd [2011] VSC 286
Last Updated: 6 July 2011
Article by Jessica Kinny and Ray Giblett

The concept of 'damage' is fundamental to business interruption insurance because without it there is often no cover.  A broad approach to what constitutes 'damage' can therefore have a significant impact on the scope of such policies. 

The Victorian Supreme Court has generally adopted a wide interpretation of the term 'damage'.  In a recent decision 'damage' was held to include a tripped fuse located on the site of another business that stopped electricity from being supplied to the plaintiff's business, causing loss. 

Interestingly, a design feature of the fuse was to 'trip' (i.e. cause damage to itself) to prevent damage from being done to the electric circuit it was attached to.  It seems that, in Victoria at least, property may be considered 'damaged' if the object's use has been altered by an incident that has made that object less useful or valuable, regardless if damage was a function of its use. 

Is this an ordinary result of a common sense approach to business interruption claims, or has the case sparked a divide between how these claims are addressed in Victoria and New South Wales?

The day the fish went 'belly-up'

The plaintiff, Mainstream Aquaculture Pty Ltd, ran a commercial fish breeding business.  On 26 October 2008, the property that the business operated in experienced a loss of electrical power because an unusual surge of electricity at a power station of an electricity provider, Powercor, caused a fuse to be blown.  This was a design feature of the fuse to protect the electric circuit.  The plaintiff's back-up electricity generator failed and as a result all the fish on the breeding site died.

 The plaintiff held two insurance policies: property damage insurance with CGU Insurance Ltd and business interruption insurance with Calliden Insurance Ltd (the Policy).  The plaintiff lodged a claim under the second policy which was rejected. 

 To determine whether the event – the blown fuse – triggered the business interruption cover, the presiding judge, Justice Croft, considered whether the fuse was 'property' within the Policy terms, whether the fuse was 'damaged' within the Policy terms and whether the damage to the fuse was a proximate cause of the interruption to the business.  Aside from an expert evidence issue (as the relevant fuse had been discarded), the key question to be determined was the meaning of the term 'damage' (undefined in the Policy). 

A short-circuited policy?

Justice Croft prefaced his finding with the general principle that an insurance policy is to be given a 'businesslike interpretation', having regard to the language used by the parties, the commercial circumstances the policy covers and the objects it is intended to secure[1].  

The 'Additional Benefits' section of the Policy included 'Failure of Supply from Public Utilities' as a covered event, including specifically 'any installation or Electricity Station or Sub-station'.  Although the term 'property' was not defined, his Honour held that the fuse was capable of constituting 'property' within the terms of the Policy.  As the 'Additional Benefits' section of the Policy extended cover for 'failure of Supply from Public Utilities' to include loss or damage to 'any installation or Electricity Station or Sub-station', the assets of Powercor were treated as the plaintiff's buildings.  It was common ground that the Policy extended to insure against damage to the plaintiff's property that causes an interruption or interference with the business.

For the policy to be enlivened, the property (i.e. the fuse) also had to be damaged.  The defendant argued that the fuse could not be said to be damaged by being 'tripped' because it was designed to blow when an unusually high level of electric current passed through it for the purpose of closing off the circuit from this electric current. The fuse blowing was in fact an intended function of the property, not damage. 

The plaintiff argued that: first, a fuse blowing in itself is damage; and second, the connections to the fuse were loose which contributed to the overheating of the fuse necessary to cause it to 'trip', contributing to the blowing of the fuse which caused the business interruption to the plaintiff. 

His Honour agreed with the argument of the plaintiff, and found that the fuse was most likely damaged prior to the power failure event and in any case was damaged or further damaged on the occurrence of the power surge.

What is 'damage'? 

Croft J found that the word 'damage' in the Policy should not have a meaning applied to it beyond its ordinary dictionary meaning: the defining characteristic of which seems to be some form of impairment, harm, hurt, or injury[2]

Based on the various authorities submitted by the plaintiff as to how the meaning of 'damage' is to be construed[3], his Honour held that:  a rupture (or 'tripped') fuse is still 'damaged', despite the fact that it is designed to operate in this manner (that is, to rupture or be 'tripped') to stop a potentially damaging overload of current[4].  Based on this interpretation, Justice Croft ruled that the business interruption was suffered from loss of electrical power, which was caused by the damaged fuse.  

How the exclusions were wired

An exclusion in the Policy also provided:  We [the defendant insurer] will not pay for: 1. Interruptions of interference to your Business arising from loss or damage caused by (unless otherwise stated): a. ... b.  Mechanical, Electrical or Electronic Breakdowns or Breakages[5]. 

The defendant submitted that the 'Exclusions' provision of the Policy was activated on two alternate grounds.  The first ground was that the failure of the back-up generator to provide alternative power to the premises constituted an electrical breakdown.  The second ground was that the damage to the fuse constituted an electronic breakdown or breakage within the meaning of the exclusion clause[6]

Justice Croft found that the exclusion did not apply, rejecting both grounds as an uncommercial reading of the Policy.  In answer to the first ground, his Honour did not consider the existence or non-operation of the generator to be relevant to the exclusion.  His Honour pointed out that the insured was not required under the Policy to have a back up generator, and could not be placed in a worse position for taking the precaution than if they did not install it[7].  

In answer to the second ground, his Honour did not categorise the damage to the fuse as an electronic breakdown within the meaning of the exclusion.  To apply the exclusion as contended would defeat all claims for insurance pursuant to a 'Failure of Supply' which required relevant property damage as a precondition to an insurance payment[8].

Will this 'damage' the position of business interruption insurers?

Justice Croft has given a broad interpretation to the meaning of 'damage' in the context of a business interruption insurance policy.  His Honour's interpretation of the term seems to follow closely the definition in Switzerland Insurance Australia Ltd v Dundean Distributors Pty Ltd[9]; that there is property damage if that property:  is interfered with in such a way as to render it less useful or valuable and in  consequence time and money are required to restore that use or value...'[10].  Such an interpretation is very wide, but not unusual.  

When considering how this affects New South Wales claims, it should be remembered that the plaintiff in this matter referenced cases in Victoria, Tasmania, South Australia and Queensland that supported similar interpretations of the meaning of 'damage'[11]

There is also authority in New South Wales supporting such a finding.  In 2004 the New South Wales Court of Appeal also considered a policy that provided cover against physical damage to property insured and found that the damage extended to: ... physical alteration or change that impairs the value or usefulness of the thing said to have been damaged[12].  

However, this should be contrasted with the earlier New South Wales Court of Appeal finding in Transfield Constructions Pty Ltd v  GIO Australia Holdings Pty Ltd[13].  In that case, the insured had contracted to build grain silos, and insured the works against 'physical loss or damage'.  Because of a defect in the silo screens, grain was being blocked and production halted until they were fixed.  To the question whether this blockage constituted 'physical loss or damage', Meagher JA, with whom Clarke and Sheller JJA concurred, held that:  loss of usefulness might in some contexts amount to damage, though even that is not beyond dispute, but in my view it cannot amount to physical damage. Functional inutility is different from physical damage.

The lesson to be learned by insurers in New South Wales, indeed all jurisdictions, is that an ordinary reading of an insurance policy – where words are given a 'businesslike interpretation' – can produce unexpected results.  Insurers would be well-advised to define key terms such as 'damage' in business interruption policies, although this should not be the only precaution that insurers take.  It is important to consider what a businesslike interpretation of the words and phrases in the policy must be when considering the range of loss scenarios that might trigger indemnity for a business interruption claim.  

[1] Croft J at 29, making reference to the judgment of Gleeson CJ in McCann v Switzerland Insurance(2000) 203 CLR 579 at 589.

[2] [2011] VSC 286 at 38

[3] Switzerland Insurance Australia Ltd v Dundean Distributors Pty Ltd  [1998] 4 VR 692 at p.714 per   Phillips JA; Ranicar v Frigmobile Pty Ltd  [1983] Tas R 113 at 116; R v Fisher  (1865) 1 LRCCR 7; R v Tacey(1821) 168 ER 893; King v Lees  (1948) 65 TLR 21; Samuels v Stubbs  (1972) 4 SASR 200; R v Zischke[1983] 1 Qd R 240.

[4] [2011] VSC 286 at 40

[5]  [2011] VSC 286 at 44

[6]  [2011] VSC 286 at 45

[7]  [2011] VSC 286 at 46

[8]  [2011] VSC 286 at 47

[9] [1998] 4 VR 692

[10] [1998] 4 VR 692 per Phillips JA at p.714

[11] [1998] 4 VR 692 at 39

[12] AXA Global Risks (UK) Ltd v Haskins Contractors Pty Ltd  [2004] 13 ANZ Ins Cas 77401 per Mason P at [41].

[13] [1997] 9 ANZ Ins Cas 61-336 

For more information, please contact:




Ray Giblett t (02) 9931 4833
Wendy Blacker t (02) 9931 4922
David Slatyer t (07) 3231 1532
Simon Carter t (07) 3114 0129
Lionel Appelboom t (03) 8738 6061  
Stuart Eustice t (03) 9252 2594

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions