Australia: Contractors v Employees: The differences and why it matters - Part 1

Industrial and Employment Law
Last Updated: 8 March 2011

Article by Andrew Tobin, Partner

1. Introduction

The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the regulatory considerations facing employers/principals who enter into contracts for service with contractors, or who are considering doing so as an alternative to a typical employment arrangement.

The paper has been divided into the following subject areas with the view to providing a practical perspective to employment law practitioners and HR professionals:

  • Contracting arrangements over employment arrangements: What's the attraction?
  • 'Rights' of contractors
  • 'Employer' obligations and liabilities in relation to contractors
  • Tax considerations
  • Contractor or employee? Tests for telling the difference
  • 'Failing to plan': The decision in Ripley v Ingles Marketing
  • Drafting a contracting agreement: Considerations

2. Contracting: What's the attraction?

2.1 Employers/principals

The perceived lack of regulation of, or government interference in, contracting arrangements, in contrast to employment relationships, is attractive to prospective employers. The primary alleged typical attractions include the ability to avoid:

  1. unfair dismissal and related employment-type claims; and
  2. various costs and administration issues associated with typical employment arrangements, including:
    1. the obligation to comply with statutory entitlements applicable to employment, such as those prescribed by the National Employment Standards under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (eg to provide paid sick, carer's, annual and other kinds of paid and unpaid leave);
    2. the obligation to comply with industrial instruments, such as awards and the various obligations they impose on employers relating to such things as rates of pay and payment for work outside ordinary hours and overtime;
    3. the obligation to withhold and remit tax under the PAYG system; and
    4. liability for statutory superannuation.

Other considerations which may be less apparent, or are not always considered by prospective employers, include:

  1. Workers' compensation: If considered at all, employers promoting contracting arrangements will generally conclude that they have no obligations to contractors in relation to workers' compensation matters.
  2. Vicarious liability (ie employer/principal liability for loss or damage caused by a worker): Our experience is that most employers are not concerned about, nor appreciate, the prospect of vicarious liability when pursing a contracting arrangement over an employment relationship. The common assumption – that a principal will not usually be vicariously liable for loss or damage caused by a genuine contractor – is not necessarily a safe assumption to make. At best, contracting may involve some 'risk shifting', including the prospect for avoiding vicarious liability.
  3. Payroll tax: Historically, employers in Queensland were not liable for payroll tax on remuneration paid to contractors. However, amendment of the Queensland payroll tax legislation in 2008 as part of the national payroll tax harmonisation process saw the introduction of 'contractor provisions' which deem parties to certain kinds of contracts to be employers and employees, and therefore payments made under such contracts to be 'wages' subject to payroll tax.

2.2 Workers

The major attraction for workers to undertake contracting arrangements, as opposed to entering into a contract of employment, is the (perceived) capacity to achieve tax benefits, such as:

  1. income tax deductions for work related expenses, not available to regular PAYG employees; and
  2. income splitting potential to reduce overall taxation liability.

2.3 Is the nature of a particular engagement up to the parties?

Having identified the attractions of a contracting arrangement, the next question is whether characterisation of a proposed engagement as a contracting arrangement – or contract for services – as an alternative to a typical employment arrangement – or contract of service - is optional?

While the intention of the parties to an engagement as to its character will be relevant – and often very important to the determination of that character1 – it is not the sole determinant.

Ultimately, the true nature of an engagement is a question of law. This is where the difficulty arises, because parties often try to squeeze what they want to look, feel and operate as a contracting engagement into a box of fact and circumstance that may not easily lend itself to that characterisation.

3. 'Rights' of contractors

3.1 Unfair dismissal claims

Genuine contractors cannot access the unfair or unlawful dismissal jurisdictions provided for in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FWA). Employers therefore do not have to worry about fair or lawful dismissal of people engaged to work as contractors. Only an 'employee' can be 'dismissed' - fairly, lawfully or otherwise - and no categories of workers, other than employees, can be treated as employees for the purpose of the statutory dismissal jurisdictions. For these purposes the classification of a worker as an 'employee', rather than something else, is determined by the common law (discussed below).

However, the status of a worker as a contractor will sometimes be disputed (after termination by the principal of the contract) by the worker bringing (among other possibilities) an unfair dismissal claim. Proceedings of that kind in these circumstances will require a determination, as a preliminary issue, of the status of the worker.2 The risk of this type of claim can be substantially ameliorated by proper consideration of the issue before or at commencement of the relationship.

The risk of exposure to claims of this kind is elevated to some extent by the fact that, at least in the preliminary stages, access to the unfair dismissal jurisdiction does not require significant expense or formality.

But even where the characterisation of a worker as a contractor is not disputed, the contractor may still have access to other potential remedies if aggrieved by circumstances surrounding termination, or other aspects, of their contract.

3.2 Common law claims

Termination of a contracting arrangement, like any other contract, might result in some kind of common law claim for damages based on an alleged breach of the contract. Expense, complexity and cost/benefit considerations will, in many circumstances, mitigate against the possibility of a common law claim. Furthermore, in most circumstances, it should be possible to reduce the risk of exposure to common law claims arising out of a contracting arrangement through appropriate documentation of the engagement at its commencement (eg through the contract termination provisions).

3.3 Unlawful discrimination claims

A contractor may bring a claim for unlawful discrimination if the basis for termination of their contract was a ground upon which discrimination in the 'work area' is prohibited, such as race, sex, age, disability, family responsibilities, and so on.3 As with unfair dismissal claims, and at least in the early stages, proceedings of this kind can be initiated without substantial complexity or expense. However, the range of remedies available for unlawful discrimination is much wider than those available in either the unfair dismissal jurisdiction or at common law.

3.4 Unfair contract claims

Until commencement of the Work Choices reforms in March 2006, contractors in some jurisdictions, including Queensland, had access to statutory jurisdictions for relief from 'unfair' contracts.4 These jurisdictions were largely relegated to irrelevance by the Commonwealth march, initiated by the Work Choices reforms, into the regulation of industrial matters generally, and largely manifested today in the State/federal cooperative scheme constituted by the Fair Work legislation. In their day, the unfair contract jurisdictions were a powerful tool in the hands of disgruntled contractors.5

The Work Choices reforms included the Independent Contractors Act 2006 (Cth) (ICA), which introduced a national unfair contracts regime operating largely to the exclusion all existing unfair contract laws in force under State legislation. The ICA, largely unaffected by the Fair Work reforms, is based on the premise that commercial, not industrial, law should govern genuine contracting relationships.

Under the ICA, some types of services contracts can be reviewed by the Federal or Federal Magistrates' Court upon either or both of the grounds that the contract is 'unfair' or 'harsh', and the Court can make a range of orders to redress any deficiencies found.6

The introduction of the ICA was a major departure from State unfair contract provisions, which traditionally provided for significant compensation where contracts were found to be unfair. Although the applicability and remedies provided under the ICA appear to be limited, employers contemplating contracting arrangements should be familiar with the potential for claims under the ICA.

Like the unfair dismissal jurisdiction, at least in theory, the unfair contract jurisdiction is more 'approachable' than the common law jurisdictions. Among other things, it has some costs advantages for prospective claimants, as the exposure of the parties to costs orders in proceedings under the ICA is limited.7

However, the jurisdiction is also limited in other ways. Significantly, while it is available to both natural persons and corporate contractors, in the latter case relief can only be sought where a company director or members of their family are performing the relevant work (ie generally to smaller owner-operator type businesses).8 The jurisdiction also does not extend to the review of services contracts for the performance of work for private or domestic purposes.9

When determining the issue of fairness, the court may take into account, among other things, the relative bargaining strengths of the parties and whether the total remuneration provided under the contract is, or is likely to be, less than what would have been paid to an employee performing similar work (ie under the terms of an award that would have applied to the work if performed by an employee).10

In an appropriate case, the court has the power to order that terms of the contract be re-written, that parts of the contract have no effect, or the contract be set aside, provided in all cases that the relief ordered is limited to that which is required to undo that aspect or those aspects of the contract found to be 'unfair' or 'harsh'

While the remedial provisions in the legislation do not expressly refer to awards of compensation, compensation can be awarded to remedy established unfairness. In the recent Federal Magistrates' Court decision in Keldote Pty Ltd & Ors v Riteway Transport Pty Ltd11, the court awarded compensation to several successful claimants, amounting in total to $100,000.

The ICA unfair contracts jurisdiction has not seen significant litigation since it became available in early 2007 and, as at March 2011, the Keldote decision is the only material example of how the jurisdiction might be used.

Potentially, the utility of the jurisdiction might be also be eroded by the general protections jurisdiction introduced by the Fair Work reforms from mid 2009, through which contractors acquired a range of additional rights and access to remedies.

3.5 General protections: Claims to enforce 'workplace rights'

The FWA provides contractors and potential contractors with protections relating to what the Act calls 'workplace rights'.12 These provisions are contained in Part 3-1 of the FWA which deals with a range of 'general protections', most of which will usually apply or relate to employment rather than contracting situations.

The effect of the provisions relating to 'workplace rights' – in relation to both employees and contractors – is that one person cannot take 'adverse action' against another person for a reason related to a 'workplace right' of the second person (eg because they have the right, have exercised it or proposed to exercise it; or to prevent exercise of the right).13

The concepts of 'adverse action' and 'workplace right' are broadly defined by the legislation.

'Workplace right[s]' extend to a range of potential industrial rights, including the potentially very broad and general right 'to make a complaint or enquiry' to an industrial regulator, such as the Fair Work Ombudsman14, to seek compliance with a workplace law or workplace instrument.

'Adverse action' in the case of contractors and potential contractors is defined to include such things as terminating a contract, altering the position of a contractor to their prejudice, refusing to use a contractor's services under an existing contract, refusing to engage someone as a contractor generally, or discriminating in the terms or conditions of engagement offered to a prospective contractor.15

A breach of the adverse action provisions has two potential consequences.

The first is liability in the person or persons who engaged in the action to a civil penalty – up to $33,000 for a corporation and up to $6,600 for individuals.

The second is that, in the current context, an aggrieved contractor, or industrial inspector on their behalf, can commence proceedings in the Federal or Federal Magistrates' Court seeking a range of remedies, extending to 'any order the court considers appropriate'. The applicant can seek not only compensation, but also recovery for their own benefit of any civil penalty ordered by the court to be paid.16

The impact that the availability of remedies to contractors or those seeking work as contractors in the general protections jurisdiction remains to be seen. The jurisdiction is, however, generating significant interest, and seemingly increasing numbers of claims, in the employment context.17

Those engaged in contracting workers would be very well advised to develop some understanding of workplace rights and adverse action as they relate to contracting arrangements.

3.6 Claims for employment entitlements

A true contracting arrangement will usually eliminate the prospect for award coverage or for the applicability of default statutory entitlements associated with employment (eg in relation to rates of pay, hours of work, penalty provisions, paid and unpaid leave, entitlements upon termination and so on). These entitlements generally depend upon the existence of a contract of employment.

Contracting principals may, however, experience problems where:

  1. the contracting arrangement is a sham, undertaken to disguise what is, in truth, a contract of employment (discussed further below);
  2. the nature of the engagement is uncertain and a claim is made, during or after the end of the engagement, for unpaid employment-based entitlements (eg under an award, enterprise agreement, or National Employment Standard). The risk of such claims can be relatively enduring; they can be brought at any time within six years after the potential liability arises18; or
  3. it is clear that the engagement is a contracting arrangement, but the worker later claims that the terms of the contract are unfair, having regard to award entitlements that would otherwise have applied had the work been performed under an employment contract. This situation is specifically contemplated by the unfair contracts jurisdiction under the ICA discussed above.19

3.7 Claims for relief from 'sham arrangements'

Division 6 of the general protection provisions in the FWA prohibit sham contracting arrangements.20

The specific conduct prohibited by the sham contracting provisions is:

  1. misrepresenting an employment contract as a contract for services;
  2. dismissing or threatening to dismiss an employee in order to re-engage them as a contractor to perform substantially the same work; and
  3. making a false statement to an employee, or former employee, in order to persuade or influence them to enter into a contract for services to perform substantially the same work.

Contravention of any of the prohibitions can attract liability for a civil penalty (up to $33,000 for corporations and $6,600 for 'involved' individuals), and entitle the worker, or an industrial inspector on their behalf, to commence proceedings in the Federal or Federal Magistrates' Court for other civil relief in the general protections jurisdiction.

The risks of these kinds of claims were recently demonstrated in a successful prosecution by the Fair Work Ombudsman of a corporate employer, its sole director and Human Resources Manager for a contravention of what is now s357 of the FWA, which prohibits misrepresentation of an employment contract as a contract for services: Fair Work Ombudsman v Centennial Financial Services Pty Ltd & Ors.21

1. See, for example, the recent decision in Vella v Integral Energy [2011] FMCA 6 (31 January 2011) where, upon an interlocutory basis, the Federal Magistrate's Court characterised a 37 year work arrangement between the parties as a contracting, rather than employment, relationship. In reaching that decision Driver FM expressed the view that "[l]eaving aside taxation shams and arrangements imposed by duress and a gross inequality of bargaining power I see no general reason to deconstruct the fundamental nature of the relationship which the parties intended." (emphasis added).

2. See Barrett v Create (Geelong) Inc T/as Create [2010] FWA 5576; Freestone v Morris & Partners Pty Ltd [2009] AIRC 223; Kennedy v Oceania Aviation Services Pty Ltd (2003) 174 QGIG 196; Doe v Sunlourve Pty Ltd (2003) QGIG 114.

3. See, as one example among others, the Anti Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld), ss7, 14, 15 and 15A and the definition of 'work' in the Dictionary to the Act which extends to 'work under a contract for services'.

4. See Industrial Relations Act 1999 (Qld), s276.

5. See eg the decision in Tomac Enterprises Pty Ltd v Newmont Pajingo Pty Ltd [2005] 178 QGIG 35 (23 December 2004). In that decision, in the exercise of the unfair contracts jurisdiction then available to contractors in Queensland, the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission awarded a corporate contractor compensation of more than $400,000. The decision was upheld on appeal to the Queensland Industrial Court.

6. ICA, ss12, 15 and 16.

7. ICA, s17.

8. ICA, s11(1)(b).

9. ICA, s11(1)(a).

10. ICA, s15.

11. [2010] FMCA 394.

12. FWA, ss340-345.

13. FWA, s340.

14. FWA, s341.

15. FWA, s342.

16. See FWA ss539, 545 and 546.

17. For a recent wider ranging discussion see The General Protections Provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009', by Claire Howell, delivered to the Union Lawyers and Industrial Officers NSW - Annual Labour Law Conference, February 2011 available online at (accessed by the author on 25 February 2011).

18. FWA, s544.

19. ICA, s15(1)(c).

20. FWA, Division 6 of Part 3-1 – Sham Arrangements, ss357-359.

21. [2010] FMCA 863.

© HopgoodGanim Lawyers

Gold Employer of Choice - ALB magazine, April 2010
Finalist, Brisbane Law Firm of the Year, ALB Australasian Law Awards 2010

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

This article is part of a series: Click Contractors v Employees: The differences and why it matters - Part 2 for the next article.
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.