Australia: Restraints of Trade: Key lessons for employers

Last Updated: 28 February 2011
Article by Andrew Tobin and Rebekah Foster

In tight economic times, employers are more willing to start proceedings to enforce restraint of trade or non-compete clauses against departing employees.

In a number of recent decisions, employers have successfully prevented former employees from competing with their business or poaching their clients for the benefit of the employee's new employers.

While these decisions demonstrate the benefit of well-drafted restraint of trade clauses, they should also prompt employers to ask potential new employees whether they have a restraint of trade clause in their old employment contract. If they do, the new employer should determine whether the clause will allow the employee to perform the work they have been, or will be, hired to perform, or how any ongoing restraint obligations might best be managed to achieve the new employer's commercial objectives.

Key lessons for employers

While it depends on the facts of each case, recent decisions make it clear that properly drafted restraint of trade clauses will be enforced by the Courts where it is reasonable and necessary to protect the employer's legitimate business interests.

It is therefore important to properly draft restraint of trade clauses, so as to maximise the likelihood that the clause will be enforced in appropriate circumstances. Employers will need to consider what the employee does, with whom they have dealings or relationships, and what the employer wants to - and legitimately can - prevent them doing after the end of their employment.

It is equally important for employers to consider whether a potential new employee is subject to postemployment restraints under an employment contract with their old employer.

Depending on the wording of any post-employment restraint clause, employees might be prevented from either starting work for you, or performing the very work you have employed them to perform, for a period of time.

Alternatively, identifying the extent to which the postemployment restraint obligations of a new employee are or are likely to be binding at an early stage of the recruitment process will help you develop strategies to manage those obligations while they endure, so as to avoid disputes with the employee's former employer.

Ross and Anor v Ice TV

Two senior executives of Ice TV were prevented from soliciting clients or competing with their former employer's business for 12 months after the termination of their employment contracts.

Ice TV distributed an electronic program guide known as the Ice Guide. It alleged that the executives breached their non-solicitation clauses when they undertook consulting work for Mobilesoft, a software engineering company, within their 12 month restraint period. Ice TV had entered into discussions with Mobilesoft, with a view to Mobilesoft becoming a customer of Ice TV.

The executives' employment contract said that they must not, during their employment or for a period of 12 months after it ends:

  • carry out or be engaged or involved in any business similar to or competitive with the business of Ice TV carried on in the 12 months before termination;
  • canvass or solicit the custom of any person who has entered into discussions or negotiations with Ice TV during the 12 months before termination of employment with a view to becoming a customer; and
  • divulge confidential information including performance reports, operation reports, profitability forecasts, business plans or normal financial information that may be of commercial value to a competitor.

The Court found that Ice TV had a legitimate interest in protecting its current customer base. In particular, it had an interest in protecting prospective customers with whom it had entered into discussions or negotiations, and maintaining the confidentiality of information that might have been utilised in the course of discussions or negotiations with such customers or potential customers.

The restraint was found to extend to potential clients with whom negotiations and discussions had occurred, but who had not yet ordered products or services. Such a restraint was held to be legitimate, as the process of building up a relationship to the point where a bundling arrangement could be entered into was prolonged and delicate.

The 12 month restraint was found by the Court to be reasonable in the circumstances. The senior executives were involved in high-level negotiations with potential customers, including Mobilesoft. Their status in the company meant they held knowledge of matters relevant to pricing and technology, and had developed relationships with potential clients.

Hanna v OAMPS Insurance Brokers Ltd

In this case, the validity of a 'cascading' restraint in the employment contract of an insurance broker was upheld.

The broker had been employed by OAMPS for approximately 20 years. He resigned and accepted an offer of employment with a rival broking firm. Three clients indicated that they intended to follow him.

His employment contract contained a cascading restraint clause, which provided for nine separate post-employment restraints. The widest restraint was for a period of 15 months in the whole of Australia, and the narrowest for 12 months in metropolitan Sydney. OAMPS sought to prevent the broker from providing services to a specified list of its clients.

Initially, the Court restrained the broker from dealing with 17 clients for a period of 12 months within Australia. The broker appealed on various grounds, including that the restraint was invalid because it was uncertain and went beyond what was reasonably necessary to protect OAMPS' interests.

Importantly, clause 4 of the restraint stated that

"Each restraint contained in this deed... constitutes a separate and independent provision, severable from the other restraints."

On appeal, the Court decided that the restraint was not uncertain. It found that there were nine separate restraints, ranging from the widest to the narrowest, and that each of these were separate and independent provisions capable of being complied with without breaching any of the others. All of the restraints were binding, severally and independently.

As insurance policies are renewed at 12 month intervals, the Court held that a 12 month restraint was reasonably necessary to show the skill and competence of the firm and attempt to maintain a connection with OAMPS' clients. The period provided OAMPS with the appropriate time necessary to protect their legitimate business interests.

The initial decision to restrain the broker from dealing with 17 of OAMPS' clients was upheld. It extended to clients the broker had dealt with previously but was not dealing with at the time of his resignation. The broker was found to be highly competent and deeply experienced, likely to create a real connection with clients if he dealt with them by reason of those attributes.

Total RISC Technology Pty Ltd v Cannings & Anor

IT company Total RISC Technology could not restrain an employee from working for another company in a 'similar' field after the Court found that the other company was not a direct competitor.

After the employee, an International Program Manager, resigned and started working for Interactive Pty Ltd, Total RISC Technology attempted to enforce a restraint clause contained in the employment contract which stated:

For a period of 6 months after termination of the employee's employment with TRT, the employee will not alone or together with any other person, whether as principal, agent, directly or indirectly carry on or be engaged, concerned or interested in or otherwise associated with any trade or business which directly competes with TRT.

The Court found that the restraint from engaging in "any trade or business which directly competes with TRT" referred to the classification of an activity, or activities, not to the identity of an employer. It stated that it was not enough to show association with a company which competed with Total RISC Technology, but rather that a breach could only be found if there had been engagement in a trade or a business which directly competed with Total RISC Technology.

The activity of Interactive as a whole was not the trade or business which was to be examined and classified. Instead, it was the trade or business of the area of Interactive in which the employee now worked. The Court determined this to be Interactive's Business Services Group and provision of managed services.

It then considered whether that trade or business directly competed with Total RISC Technology. In considering the meaning of 'directly competes', the Court said that it was not enough that Total RISC Technology and Interactive were in competition. In assessing whether a business directly competes with another business, the primary focus is on the perception of the customer, and any influence which the services available from one side or the other have on the customer's decisions about where to place their business.

While the Court held that there was not a high degree of differentiation in the end product of each business, the manner of delivery and resources required were sufficient to differentiate them in this case.

BDO Group Investments (NSW-Vic) Pty Ltd & Ors v Ngo & Ors

Two directors of accounting firm BDO were recently prevented from leaving to work for a rival firm after interlocutory orders were made enforcing employment and contractual restraints against them.

In 2009, the directors entered into a Sale Agreement, Unitholders Deed and Employment Agreement as part of a deal that merged BDO Kendalls in Victoria with BDO practices in NSW and the ACT. They became directors of the combined BDO Group and received a share of the $75 million sale price, which was paid entirely for the goodwill of the Victorian business. They both later gave notice of their resignation, intending to join a rival organisation.

BDO sought to enforce restraints contained in the three agreements, which each contained various restraints directed at preventing competition and the solicitation of BDO Group clients. The restraints in each of the agreements varied in length from three months to five years. BDO argued that the restraints had been put in place to protect the value of the goodwill it had purchased from acts of 'destructive competition'. The employment contract required the directors to give two years notice if they resigned before June 2014.

The directors argued that the restraints went beyond what was needed to protect BDO's legitimate interests and that the notice period was "harsh, unjust and unfair".

The Court accepted that, while the law was generally opposed to restraints of trade in employment contracts except in limited circumstances, these considerations do not apply where parties have equal bargaining power and enter into a contract for the sale of goodwill.

The Court found that the interrelationship of the three agreements the directors entered into made it very difficult, and possibly quite inappropriate, to treat the provisions of the employment contract in isolation. In the context of the sale of a business, the approach of the Court was, essentially, based on commercial fairness and the need to uphold parties to the bargain which they have made.

The directors alleged that they would suffer hardship if prevented from pursuing careers with the rival company. However, BDO offered to continue to pay the directors their full entitlements during the notice period and give them the option of working. The Court found in favour of BDO, preventing the directors from resigning and joining a rival firm until a full trial of the matter.

For more information

HopgoodGanim's Industrial and Employment Law team can assist by:

  • drafting restraint of trade provisions with maximum potential for enforceability;
  • advising about the extent to which, if at all, noncompete obligations imposed on a prospective
  • new employee are likely to be binding or impact on their proposed employment with you;
  • helping you to manage the departure of departing employees so as to maximise your ability to protect your business goodwill and other legitimate interests;
  • developing strategies to manage the obligations of new employees who bring non-compete obligations with them, with a view to avoiding disputes; and
  • prosecuting or defending proceedings to enforce restraint obligations or protect your confidential information.

For more information about restraint of trade provisions, please contact HopgoodGanim's Industrial and Employment Law team.

© HopgoodGanim Lawyers

Gold Employer of Choice - ALB magazine, April 2010
Finalist, Brisbane Law Firm of the Year, ALB Australasian Law Awards 2010

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Andrew Tobin
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.