Australia: Well-drafted RFT saves government from liability to tenderers

Last Updated: 8 December 2010
Article by Scott Alden and Alyson Eather

When principals engage with the market for the procurement of goods and services, careful consideration and time is normally spent reviewing conditions of contract to ensure that the document adequately manages risk and addresses the specific requirements of the principal.

The recent case of IPEX ITG Pty Ltd (in liq) v State of Victoria (2010) VSC 480 highlights the importance of adequate review and drafting of the invitation to tender document to ensure that the drafting of the terms of the invitation to tender minimise any exposure to process contract risk.


On 20 May 2002, the Parliament of Victoria issued a written request for tender (RFT) for system integration services to implement a new desktop standard operating environment for the parliament. The plaintiff, Ipex, was one of a number of suppliers that submitted a tender in response.

The RFT document was detailed and included an overview of the selection process and evaluation criteria, the terms and conditions, description of parliament's existing IT environment and a list of parliament's requirements.

A tender evaluation plan was prepared at the same time as the RFT, but this was not made available to tenderers.

Recipients of the RFT were invited to attend a briefing session, which clarified a number of matters and answered questions. Prior to the closing of the tenders, various questions (69 in total) were asked by tenderers. Each question and answer was circulated to all tenderers, including Ipex.

After the close of tenders, the evaluation and selection process took place. A qualitative functional evaluation was followed by a cost evaluation. After this, a value-for-money analysis took place, resulting in a short list of two and finally selection of the successful tenderer.

On 16 July 2002, Ipex was told that its tender had been unsuccessful and was invited to attend a 'detailed debrief'.

On 9 September 2002, Ipex instituted proceedings against the State of Victoria. Ipex claimed that as the lowest-priced tenderer, it should have been awarded the contract.


The issues to be determined by the court were:

  • Whether Ipex's submission of a tender in response to the RFT gave rise to a process contract.
  • Whether parliament acted fairly, reasonably and in good faith and complied with the criteria and approach referred to in the RFT.


Sifris J of the Supreme Court of Victoria dismissed Ipex's claim, despite having found that a process contract existed between the parties, as parliament did not depart from the RFT.

Process contract

Ipex alleged that as a consequence of it having submitted a conforming tender, Ipex and the State of Victoria entered into a process contract, which comprised the terms set out in the RFT together with further terms that were to be implied.

His Honour stated that to determine whether the parties intended to bind themselves contractually to comply with the proposed tender process depended on the intention of the parties as disclosed by the tender documents.

Having reviewed the relevant case law on process contracts, his Honour stated that the authorities suggested that courts are more willing to find process contracts as governing the relationship of the parties pre-award in cases where a timeline and detailed process, including evaluation criteria, are set out to suggest that an obligation (promissory in nature) to follow the timeline and process had been incurred.

His Honour stated that it was abundantly clear that each case must be considered on its own facts. Each request for tender and the relevant context and circumstances must be examined separately in order to determine whether there is any intention to create an immediately binding contract as to process.

At the conclusion of such an examination, his Honour concluded that the presumed intention of the parties was to enter into a legally binding process contract. The RFT was not simply a document that provided relevant information, but rather included in some detail the specific criteria that would form the basis of the evaluation. The decisive factor was a clause in the RFT that contained detailed evaluation criteria that parliament said 'will' or 'must' be applied. This clause and others suggested a commitment, promissory in nature, to abide by a process, particularly in relation to the evaluation of tenders.

Accordingly, the parties were found to be bound by the process contract.

Conduct of parliament

The question as to whether parliament acted fairly, reasonably and in good faith - and complied with the criteria and approach referred to in the RFT - required a detailed analysis of its conduct.

The essence of Ipex's complaint was that the State engaged in conduct that departed in a number of respects from the RFT, including:

  • reliance upon flawed evaluation criteria in the assessment of tenders;
  • failure to do a proper value-for-money analysis;
  • failure to inform Ipex of the evaluation criteria weightings;
  • failure to inform Ipex that tenderers would be shortlisted;
  • reliance upon matters that would particularly influence the evaluation of the tenders, which were not incorporated into the RFT and were not communicated to Ipex; and
  • failure to comply with the evaluation process set out in the RFT.

Having reviewed each of the alleged departures by parliament, his Honour found:

  • That the evaluation procedure and weightings complied with the RFT and the evaluation plan.
  • An obligation to assess tenders on the basis of value-for-money does not compel the selection of the cheapest tender (in any event, parliament had expressly reserved the right not to accept the lowest quotation in the RFT, and given this express term, there was no basis for Ipex to contend that the lowest quotation gave it any entitlement to be selected).
  • There was no obligation to inform the tenderers of the actual weightings to be applied to the criteria.
  • As the RFT expressly reserved the right to continue to negotiate with one or more selected tenderers, parliament did not breach the process contract, but on the contrary it acted pursuant to the contract.
  • The RFT properly defined the scope of the project and all tenderers were treated equally and in accordance with the terms and condition set out in the RFT.
  • As all tenderers were judged by equivalent criteria, the decision not to take the financial, privacy and legal criteria into account did not affect the outcome of the evaluation process.

His Honour concluded that none of the conduct complained of was anything other than conduct specifically permitted and contemplated by the RFT as clarified by the industry briefing and 69 questions. The parliament did what it said it would do. It did not depart from the RFT in any of the respects identified, and any departure was either minimal, irrelevant or specifically permitted by the process contract.

His Honour further stated that in any event, there were express terms in the RFT to the effect that parliament reserved the right to not accept the lowest quotation, negotiate with tenderers and change any details of the RFT. Accordingly, within any of the above reserved rights departure was specifically permitted.


Ipex argued that it took a minimalist approach in its tender, which focused on cost, as it relied on what an individual employee of the parliament had told Ipex - that 'cost, cost, cost' would be the major determinant.

It was an express condition of the RFT that tenderers should not rely on information provided by any person, including employees, agents and consultants of parliament, with the exception of matters expressly set out in the RFT or advised in writing. His Honour held that if Ipex misunderstood the selection criteria it was not due to any fault of the parliament or as a result of anything contained in the RFT.


This case represents a further entrenchment of the process contract in Australia. It serves as a reminder to those issuing invitations to tender to carefully consider that the tender process may give rise to contractual rights and obligations. It is important to understand the legal implications of the tender conditions. This case demonstrates the need to adequately train all personnel involved in the tender process in relation to the relevant risks to ensure that representations, such as the one that gave rise to this claim, are not made.

Additionally, it highlights that tender documents must be reviewed and drafted to ensure they give principals the widest discretion possible and express rights to vary the tender process at the principal's sole discretion.


  1. Hughes Aircraft Systems International v Airservice Australia (1997) 76 FCR 151; Pratt Contractors Ltd v Palmerston North City Council [1995] 1 NZLR 469; Blackpool and Fylde Aero Club Ltd v Blackpool Borough Council (1990) 1 WLR 1195; Transit New Zealand v Pratt Contractors Ltd [2002] 2 NZLR 313; Cubic Transportation Systems Inc v New South Wales (2002) NSWSC 656; Dockpride Pty Ltd & Anor v Subiaco Redevelopment Authority (2005) WASC 211.

© DLA Phillips Fox

DLA Phillips Fox is one of the largest legal firms in Australasia and a member of DLA Piper Group, an alliance of independent legal practices. It is a separate and distinct legal entity. For more information visit

This publication is intended as a first point of reference and should not be relied on as a substitute for professional advice. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.